User talk:Encoded/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Talk:Benjamin_Miller_(academic)

Hi @Encoded. Thank you for reviewing my request on Talk:Benjamin_Miller_(academic). I have responded to your question there. Please take a look when you have time.HRShami (talk) HRShami (talk) 04:11, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the ping, will look now! Encoded  Talk 💬 17:31, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

Talk:W. P. Carey School of Business

Looks like the page has exceeded the post-expand include size. That'd be why new templates and pings are not working. Melted Brie^ASU (onward to victory · t · c) 21:04, 27 September 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up! If there's no more activity in a week or so I'll archive that discussion so there's no further issues. Thanks, Encoded  Talk 💬 17:30, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

Appropriateness RE the See Also Section

Hiya!

I've written one article, M. Laura Feltri, the late former director of the university department where I work (this is conflict of interest has been disclosed). Our department a "legacy page" for her (found here) which lists her awards, grants, a professional summary in her own words, etc. This page has not been cited in the article, but may be of interest for curious readers. Would this be appropriate to list in a See Also section? Additionally, it's my understanding that it's frowned upon to cite sources published by her department or university - is this the case?

Thank you! RileyRobbins (talk) 14:34, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

Hey @RileyRobbins, I'd recommend putting it in a new 'External Links' section below the references. That's typically for any links leaving Wikipedia, as See also is for other wiki pages.

It is frowned upon to cite sources published by a primary source, but not completely barred. You can use a primary source if it is reputably published, used to cite simple facts, and not "analyzed, evaluated, interpreted, or synthesized". Extra caution should be taken to check that everything that's being verified is actually explicitly said in the source and secondary sources should still make up the large majority of sources. If you have any further Qs or specific examples please let me know!

Hope this helps, Encoded  Talk 💬 17:29, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

Edit Request Revisons

Hi @Encoded, thank you for reviewing my COI edit request on Talk:Matthew Hoffman (TV host). Unfortunately it was declined, though I'd like to resubmit it based on the feedback provided. To resubmit this request, would it be best for me to submit a new request entirely, edit the existing one, or provide the edited information in a reply to the original request?

Thank you, MapleTrail92 (talk) 16:10, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

Hey @MapleTrail92, the easiest will probably be to edit the existing request. To re-add the request to the queue remove the parameters from the edit coi template. Thanks, Encoded  Talk 💬 16:33, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

Sounds good, thank you MapleTrail92 (talk) 19:44, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

Question from Sergeevich92 (14:30, 2 October 2025)

Hello. I work for the company that develops drug buntanetap. I wanted to modify the information on Wiki because the current page is outdated and has wrong facts. I wrote a new article and provided links. It was reverted back to old version now. Why? --Sergeevich92 (talk) 14:30, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Sergeevich92, welcome to Wikipedia. The edit in question was reverted due to Most of your references do not satisfy MEDRS and also fail verification. Discuss on article talk page before making edits again. Since you work for the company that develops the drug, you'll need to request the edits on the talk page. To do so, visit the edit request wizard. Hope this helps, Encoded  Talk 💬 16:19, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

Question from Andy Kitchener (13:07, 7 October 2025)

Hi I have created my first page, however I have named it BLob instead of Blob

Is there a way of correcting this?? regards Andy --Andy Kitchener (talk) 13:07, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

Hey Andy, I’ve fixed that for you. Once you’re auto confirmed you’ll be able to move and rename pages yourself. In the meantime feel free to message if you need any more title corrections. Thanks, Encoded  Talk 💬 14:29, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

Education Article in Draft Form

Hi @Encoded. Thank you for your help with our Basis Independent Wiki page. Can you help with our Chesterbrook Academy page? We've resubmitted our draft for review, but it's been sitting as well. We really appreciate your help. NR12141988 (talk) 19:13, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

Robinhood Markets

Hi Encoded. I'm hoping you could please have a look at an edit request I recently posted here: Talk:Robinhood Markets#Edits to History section. If you can review and implement , that would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, BlueScope25 (talk) 15:42, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi @BlueScope25, since the COI queue is so long at the moment with requests dating back to July, I'm currently working through it in date order in the interest of fairness to all. I should be down to yours by the end of the week if no other editors get there in the mean time. Apologies, Encoded  Talk 💬 17:24, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply, Encoded. This is just a reminder in case you are now able to take a look at the edit request posted here: Talk:Robinhood Markets#Edits to History section. I appreciate your help. BlueScope25 (talk) 15:29, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Question from The Transhumanist (06:59, 13 October 2025)

Dear mentor,

There's this new feature called Home Page, and when I went on it, there was a section in the corner that says your my mentor! There was a box to communicate to you through, to ask any question, and so, I was wondering if I could pick your brain about the impact of Wikipedia on AI and vice versa...

Where in the Wikimedia community is AI (in relation to Wikipedia) being discussed?

I'm interested in the impact AI is making on Wikipedia, including reduced traffic, reduction in editors, AI-generated content on Wikipedia, AI out competing Wikipedia with on-demand near-instant AI-generated articles by conversation bots, and anything else pertaining to Wikipedia-AI.

Is Wikipedia in danger of going the way of the dinosaurs due to AI? And if so, when?

Or, will Wikipedia adapt by itself being developed into an AI?

Please respond on my talk page.

Thank you.

Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   06:59, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

P.S.: I don't recall signing up for a mentor. Would you please check to see how I got one?

 Done Responded via requester's talk page - Encoded  Talk 💬 09:42, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

EuroStack page controversy again

Hello @Encoded -- thank you for your help recently on the EuroStack page. Can you help again? A brand new account seems to want to associate unrelated and seemingly controversial content about Cristina Caffarra's past (none really, while the cast with TikTok is interesting and important, it's one in a hundred clients in her career -- and the link is thin!!), but it misses the mark. The account is brand new, no track record, etc... How do we create balance, neutrality and transparency with accounts that pop out of nowhere? Thank you! Ylechelle (talk) 12:47, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Hey I've reverted the account's edit and sent them an edit warning. Thanks, Encoded  Talk 💬 09:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank you! Unfortunately, your warning seems to have been ignored. 2A04:CEC0:C017:D38E:594C:AE54:B58:F60F (talk) 16:29, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Hey, I messaged directly and they said they don't have any conflict to declare, not much I can do other than that without more proof/someone with more power to check - if you wanted to you can escalate to WP:COIN to ask for that but I'll leave that up to you. I've added the article to my watchlist anyways so I'll keep an eye on it because I think the claims being added are WP:BLP violations anyways. Thanks, Encoded  Talk 💬 22:28, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Just pinging you a reply here to give you an update, the content they've added is now properly sourced, if you wanted it removed you'd have to gain consensus. Since it's properly sourced I'd say it's fine to stay unless there's a compelling reason for it's removal, and if you wanted consensus on its removal I'd step aside during that discussion as an involved editor and let others discuss in this case. Thanks, Encoded  Talk 💬 07:00, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Interest in Viagogo request?

Hi Encoded, I appreciate your reviews on Eric Baker and StubHub. I was curious if you might also be interested in taking a look at my request for Viagogo? It has been up for around the same amount of time as the others. No worries if not, I know you are busy. Cheers Stephanie BINK (talk) 15:38, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

Hey, I've approved the edit. Apologies for the delay. Thanks, Encoded  Talk 💬 09:50, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

No worries, I know you're busy! Thanks for coming back to it! Stephanie BINK (talk) 01:24, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

Question from YaseenSurrani (06:50, 14 October 2025)

hello ,i want to change one of my client page information

my client Page Link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magd_Abdel_Wahab

below is his message

I would like to suggest replacing several existing references in this article that currently rely on primary or non-independent sources with more reliable, secondary, and verifiable ones. The following seven references and their suggested replacements: 1. "Finite Element Modelling Research Group (FEMRG) at Ghent University". Replace it by: https://research.ugent.be/web/home/en: Researcher: Magd Abdel Wahab 2. "Prof. dr. ir. Magd Abdel Wahab – University of Ghent profile". Replace by: https://www.ugent.be/ea/emsme/en/research/soete/overview.htm: Title: Finite Element Modelling 3. "Prof. Dr. Magd Abdel Wahab – Google Scholar". Replace by: https://scholar.google.com/ : Title: Prof. Dr. Magd Abdel Wahab 4. "Magd Abdel Wahab Books". Replace by: https://link.springer.com/: Title: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Fracture, Fatigue and Wear 5. "ACADEMIC BIBLIOGRAPHY". Replace by: https://biblio.ugent.be/: Publications: Magd Abdel Wahab 6. "The 2009 International Conference of Mechanical Engineering". Replace by: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/XIOS_Hogeschool_Limburg 7. "Topical Collection "Fracture, Fatigue, and Wear"". Replace by: https://e6.ijs.si/people

Kindly help me to edit and change some important references in his Article Page

Thank you --YaseenSurrani (talk) 06:50, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Hey thanks for the message. I've seen your request on the talk page and added it to the COI request queue. Unfortunately I don't have time to look at it today but hopefully someone will be by soon to take a look. You'll get a reply on the talk page. Thanks, Encoded  Talk 💬 22:27, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lancashire Wolverines Logo 2017.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lancashire Wolverines Logo 2017.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

1982 America's Junior Miss District of Columbia

Hello, I would like to request the addition of verified information regarding my participation in the 1982 America’s Junior Miss national competition.

I, Maxine D. Shelton, was the official Miss District of Columbia for America’s Junior Miss 1982. Although this information is not currently listed, it can be verified through:

The official 1982 national program, which includes the show order and portrait pages of all 52 contestants (including myself).

Records maintained by Distinguished Young Women headquarters in Mobile, Alabama (formerly America’s Junior Miss). For accuracy and documentation purposes, I respectfully request that the following statement be added:

Maxine D. Shelton represented the District of Columbia in the 1982 America’s Junior Miss national competition (now known as Distinguished Young Women).

Thank you for helping ensure the historical record accurately reflects verified participation.

Best Regards,

Maxine D. Shelton Templescarellc (talk) 23:14, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

Hey @Templescarellc, unfortunately that article only lists the winners of the national competition, not individual state winners. It'd be quite long in that case! Unless it's a particularly notable win for some reason (e.g. first X winner) it would typically not be documented. I'd recommend asking on that page's Talk:America's Junior Miss as the folks over there will know more about it than I do, thanks! Encoded  Talk 💬 17:05, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

Question from Jfg1976 (02:35, 16 October 2025)

Hi Encoded. I want to disclose I am a

for my dad's Wikipage but I do not understand where or how to place this information. Can you assist with this? I edited the first paragraph today and want to make sure I am doing things correctly here.

Thank you in advance. Jfg1976. --Jfg1976 (talk) 02:35, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for sending me a message and disclosing your COI. I've placed the relevant notices on your father's talk page and your user page. To request edits to his page you should use the edit request wizard. We ask that all users with conflicts of interests do this so that it can be reviewed by an impartial editor.

It can sometimes take a week or two for edits to be reviewed depending on how busy it gets but you can usually speed it along by messaging one of the reviewers and asking if they'd be happy to look at it. Thanks, and welcome to Wikipedia! Encoded  Talk 💬 16:58, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

Question from WhiteFactLoom (04:26, 21 October 2025)

Hi mentor,

I’ve drafted an article about Openly, Inc., an American insurance technology company, at User:WhiteFactLoom/Openly, Inc..

Could you please review it and share feedback on its notability and sourcing before I submit it to Articles for Creation (AfC)?

Thanks! --WhiteFactLoom (talk) 04:26, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Hey, looks like a good article! A few of the insurance journal sources are coming up as page not found for me, will be worth looking at before submitting. archive.org and archive.ph might have copies saved that you can use. I'd also suggest merging funding into history as it could come across as promotional/having undue weight to some editors, but that is up to you! If you need anything else please let me know! Thanks, Encoded  Talk 💬 16:38, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Question from Strandedkerbal (16:19, 22 October 2025)

Hi! Didn’t know Wikipedia mentors existed lol, I’ve just been fixing stuff when I can in my free time but I may expand some space related articles because 90% of my time here is looking at space topics. --Strandedkerbal (talk) 16:19, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Hey @Strandedkerbal, welcome to Wikipedia! Us mentors do exist, though not very well advertised! I'm here if you have any questions or need help with anything at all :) Thanks for helping to fix up some articles, and good look writing some if you decide to do so! I've left a welcome message on your talk page with a tonne of info on it, don't worry about memorising it all or anything like that - but it might be useful for reference in the future if you find yourself needing it! Hope it helps, Encoded  Talk 💬 16:36, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Thanks! I just added a citation for something in an article about C type asteroids Strandedkerbal (talk) 16:44, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Looks good! Encoded  Talk 💬 20:20, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:C data types on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 18:32, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Question from TheeCitationist (18:55, 22 October 2025)

Note: TheeCitationist's mentor Như Gây Mê is away.

Hello. How do I make an edit and publish it to my username? --TheeCitationist (talk) 18:55, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi, are you looking to edit an article or do you wish to change your username? Thanks, Encoded  Talk 💬 20:17, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

StubHub and Viagogo

Hi Encoded! Just wanted to drop you a line in case you were interested in taking a look at requests I made for the StubHub and Viagogo articles. Viagogo is an especially simple one and just has to do with removing some redundant content. Appreciate any thoughts you might have! Stephanie BINK (talk) 21:24, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Question from Iliketheletterb2 (05:03, 27 October 2025)

e --Iliketheletterb2 (talk) 05:03, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

i didnt ) to type that Iliketheletterb2 (talk) 05:04, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

how do i create an article Iliketheletterb2 (talk) 05:05, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Hey @Iliketheletterb2, visit the article wizard to get started! Hope this helps, Encoded  Talk 💬 19:08, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Question from Madhusinghnyc (02:14, 29 October 2025)

How can I create a newly published book citation page? Thanks in advance for help and guidance. --Madhusinghnyc (talk) 02:14, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi, if you're looking to create a page for a book visit the article wizard to get started. Hope this helps, Encoded  Talk 💬 19:08, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Seeking feedback on a Wikipedia work page

Hi @Encoded! I wanted to ask if you might be willing to help with a small issue on the Wikipedia work page that lists companies and editors involved in paid editing. Outspoken is currently listed under “undisclosed editors,” but I’ve always disclosed my paid status by adding COI tags to the talk pages of any articles I’ve worked on.

Since you’ve seen my past work and know that I follow Wikipedia’s disclosure policies, I thought you might be a good neutral editor to help move or correct that entry. I’m not blocked from editing the page, but I’d rather avoid any appearance of impropriety by requesting assistance from someone independent. I'd appreciate any feedback or help that you could provide.

Here’s the link to the page for reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_paid_editing_companies#Outspoken_Media SBCornelius (talk) 18:37, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi @SBCornelius, I certainly agree that you follow the disclosure policies. Your userpage alone should prove that. I'm sorry to hear you've been put in the undisclosed section of that list. I've moved you down to the disclosed section which lists paid editors that correctly follow policy, since I've not seen any evidence to suggest you've done any non-disclosure whatsoever. Thanks, Encoded  Talk 💬 19:16, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

@Encoded, thank you for correcting this so quickly! SBCornelius (talk) 20:07, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Hope this isn't rude but...

You said in this edit summary that I've worked with the COI queue for a couple of years, but using XTools, I only see single digits edit count for you at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. Did you mean something else in the edit summary? ☆ Bri (talk) 21:09, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Hey @Bri, I haven't been active at the noticeboard but I do work in the COI edit request queue Encoded  Talk 💬 21:12, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Oh duh, of course. I used to be more active at COIN and didn't recognize your username from there. ☆ Bri (talk) 21:15, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

No worries, I've been meaning to show my face over there more often - haven't been around much in the past! Thanks, Encoded  Talk 💬 21:18, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Help with Draft:Sanket_Goel

Hi @Encoded,

I hope you’ve been doing well! I wanted to quickly follow up here (since I wasn’t sure if you’d seen my email earlier). Thank you again for all your guidance with the Sanket Goel article. It’s been really helpful in improving the draft and ensuring compliance with COI and neutrality guidelines.

The draft has now been submitted for a while now, and I just wanted to check if there’s anything further I should be doing to make it easier to review, or if it’s best to simply wait in the queue. I completely understand that reviews take time and appreciate all the volunteer effort that goes into this process.

Thanks, Shashy 922 (talk) 05:03, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Hey @Shashy 922, apologies for missing the email. I've been travelling with work recently so I haven't been checking as frequently as usual. You can speed up the review by asking past reviewers, unfortunately I don't have time at the moment otherwise I'd take a look. Other than that, just best to sit in the queue I'm afraid. Encoded  Talk 💬 18:01, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Question from Kimulo56 (22:49, 2 November 2025)

so. what are some tips when writing an article on a video game. i just started today and i need help. --Kimulo56 (talk) 22:49, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

Hey @Kimulo56, welcome to Wikipedia! The best place to get started is over at WP:TUTORIAL, that will teach you everything that you need to know! Hope that helps, Encoded  Talk 💬 18:03, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Question from AyoDontStop (09:25, 3 November 2025)

How to add an image --AyoDontStop (talk) 09:25, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Hey, you can upload it at the file upload wizard then add it to the page using Insert -> Image. Hope that helps, Encoded  Talk 💬 18:04, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you AyoDontStop (talk) 09:48, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

No problem, if you have any more questions please feel free to ask! Thanks, Encoded  Talk 💬 22:35, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Question from JerryChaves (14:17, 6 November 2025)

I had wanted to see if I can add an article citation on the dead internet theory (https://epoch.ai/blog/will-we-run-out-of-data-limits-of-llm-scaling-based-on-human-generated-data) and (https://graphite.io/five-percent/more-articles-are-now-created-by-ai-than-humans). Just wanted to see what the best ways/guidelines are? --JerryChaves (talk) 14:17, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

Hey, WP:BLOG will help here! I'd consider that reliable as it's from a subject matter expert. Thanks, Encoded  Talk 💬 22:42, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Question from Oscar Hislop-Holland (13:11, 9 November 2025)

How do I publish an article? --Oscar Hislop-Holland (talk) 13:11, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

Hey, WP:INTRO is a great introduction to editing and using Wikipedia in general. You can create a new article and submit it for creation at the article wizard. Hope this helps, Encoded  Talk 💬 22:43, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Question from Qzvm (16:39, 11 November 2025)

Hi Encoded! I'm new and want to learn how to edit articles. I'll let you know if I have any questions! --Qzvm (talk) 16:39, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! If you need any help or have any questions feel free to send me a message! Encoded  Talk 💬 23:09, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Question from Qzvm (16:46, 11 November 2025)

What are some general editing rules I should know? For example, what to link and what not to link. Thanks! --Qzvm (talk) 16:46, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Hey, generally for what to link we have the concept of reliable sources, in short - if it's secondary (independent of the article's subject), has significant coverage of the article's subject (not just a passing mention), and is reputably published it's typically ok! News articles, websites, newspaper clippings, etc. are great examples. If there's any particular sources you'd like help with feel free to send them over and I can give you my thoughts.

The best way to learn is by visiting the introduction - there's a tonne of policies and guidelines, don't worry if you can't remember them all, I still find myself looking stuff up sometimes! As long as you edit with good faith and are open to discussing any concerns or issues, you'll be fine! I'm also a big fan of being bold!

Hope this helps, and if you have any more questions please feel free to ask! Encoded  Talk 💬 23:13, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:The Age of Disclosure on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 19:31, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Question from Oliviam443 (16:29, 14 November 2025)

Hey! I am trying to help a couple of local businesses get on Wikipedia as part of the government SMB program. May I know how to create a draft for their pages? --Oliviam443 (talk) 16:29, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Hey @Oliviam443, you can create crafts at the article wizard. If you're working for the program (volunteer or paid) this is classed as a conflict of interest on Wikipedia and you'll need to disclose it. WP:DISCLOSE has info on how to do that, if you need any help with that please let me know! Since drafts are reviewed by impartial users there's no restrictions there so you're welcome to write them as normal. If you have any other questions please feel free to ask! Hope this helps, Encoded  Talk 💬 10:07, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

Question from Angelthespobfan (04:10, 15 November 2025)

I edited before but? How do I add a source --Angelthespobfan (talk) 04:10, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

Hey @Angelthespobfan, this page: WP:REFVISUAL has a tutorial on how to add sources. If you have any more questions please let me know! Hope this helps, Encoded  Talk 💬 10:03, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

Question from Angelthespobfan (18:58, 15 November 2025)

I made my edits into my article why nickelodeon went downhill --Angelthespobfan (talk) 18:58, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 18 November 2025 (UTC)