🇮🇷 Iran Proxy | https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sohom_Datta
Jump to content

User talk:Sohom Datta

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tech News: 2025-28

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:02, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections | Call for Candidates

[edit]
Administrator Elections | Call for Candidates

The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/Candidates.

Here is the schedule:

  • July 9–15 - Call for candidates
  • July 18–22 - Discussion phase
  • July 23–29 - SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

  • The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
  • Prospective candidates are advised to become familiar with the community's expectations of administrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for RfA candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
  • The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.
  • The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.
  • Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. A separate user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The spinner never stops spinning. It gets to 136 out of 137 urls, iirc, and then spins forever, until the error page comes up with the link to your UTP. Try: https://link-dispenser.toolforge.org/analyze/Regency%20of%20Algiers .

Also: an enhancement request: there is a jitter issue in the display while it is still working on the list of urls. Do you by any chance re-sort the list on the fly while it is still running? Because the display is a bit jittery, and prevented me from focusing on a single citation that interested me, from which I wanted to select and copy some info, but before I could complete the operation, the screen jittered, the citation jumped out of view to some nearby location beyond the window borders, and I had to search for it again, and try to select again, and...oops!—there it goes again. It would be nice to set a timer of maybe 30 seconds or whatever is needed to find/select/copy some info. (A checkbox option not to re-sort until done, or only at user-selected intervals, would be nice.) Thanks for a great tool! Mathglot (talk) 04:04, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Additional info: I ran it again, and even when it reaches 136/137, it keeps swapping the urls around (at least the top ones, the ones I can see above the fold), with the top one rotating among these three titles:
  • Correspondance des deys d'Alger avec la cour de France 1579 — 1833
  • Rubrique : Articles N° 5
  • Traités de la France Avec les pays De l'Afrique du Nord Algérie, Tunisie, Tripolitaine, Maroc
For what it's worth, all three have the tag 'Detected issue: URL might be down', so I am guessing that maybe the tool keeps a list of urls that 404'd, and tries them again in a loop, is that right? If that is so, imho there is no need to place the one on top that is currently being regrabbed; what I would do, is just leave all the 404s in whatever order (alphabetical?) and maybe add an unobtrusive icon that would represent 'retrying this url' in front of the one you are retrying, without shifting the position of that one and all the others. Maybe something like 🔁 – (U+1F501: Clockwise Rightwards Open Circle Arrow), or (U+21BB: Clockwise Open Circle Arrow) which looks like a refresh icon, or an animated image that looks like that and gently pulses or rotates.
Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 19:51, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The 136/137 issue should be a worker that is erroring due to a DOI that returns a 404. The jitter problem is a VueJS problem which reorders elements on re-render, it might be a bit of a mess to fix, but I'll see what I can do. Sohom (talk) 20:05, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed User

[edit]

This is not a good this for new user.how to get Extended confirmed user group tell me.you are indian people.Nation first. Olitun (talk) 10:48, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ic you are indian Please reply me. Olitun (talk) 11:08, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Appealing to nationalistic sentiment will get you nowhere. I still stand by my actions to revoke WP:XC, you are clearly not a new user, having already submitted a WP:AELECT candidacy and a board election nomination that is completely AI generated and definitely partially fabricated. You may get back your extended confirmed user-right after making 500 substantial edits to the encyclopedia and engaging with our content properly instead of just doing edits to hat collect. Sohom (talk) 12:51, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
From the previous account I have been working for 5 years now but this is my new account.Thank you Olitun (talk) 13:30, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Care to disclose what that account is ? -- You've also claimed to be a Wikimedia Foundation employee until yesterday, I think I have the right to be more than a bit skeptical here. Sohom (talk) 13:36, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I request to remove my gaming to reach tag because this is effect my account. Olitun (talk) 13:46, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ᱟᱢᱮᱢ ᱵᱟᱰᱟᱭ ᱜᱮᱭᱟ ᱱᱚᱣᱟ ᱫᱚ ᱞᱟᱹᱜᱤᱫ ᱟᱱ ᱠᱟᱛᱷᱟ ᱫᱚ ᱵᱟᱝ ᱠᱟᱱᱟ Olitun (talk) 13:47, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Besides your ability to edit extended-confirmed pages, almost nothing is affected. Almost every page you previously edited is still accessible to you (yes you cannot submit a WP:AELECT nomination but that is a feature not a bug) It is within my admin discretion to remove WP:XC and I do not intend to reverse the decision outside of community consensus, if you want to appeal it feel free to take me to WP:ANI to do so. Sohom (talk) 14:05, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LLM Editfilter

[edit]

Can you add utm_source=chatgpt.com to Special:AbuseFilter/1325? Thanks, Polygnotus (talk) 12:05, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Polygnotus, Special:AbuseFilter/1346 already has that, maybe it should be merged ? Sohom (talk) 12:44, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah that would make sense. Polygnotus (talk) 12:54, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Brave (web browser)

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Brave (web browser) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of GalStar -- GalStar (talk) 03:43, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Edit filter noticeboard § Edit filters related to logging and blocking AI edits. –Novem Linguae (talk) 05:34, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request for review: Kocaeli Health and Technology University

[edit]
  • Subject:* University article review
  • Description:* This article covers a newly established university with an infobox, logo, and cited sources. Requesting a quality assessment and suggestions for improvement.

Hi everyone,

I recently created the article Kocaeli Health and Technology University and would appreciate a review or quality rating. Thank you in advance!

-- Newinwiki8 (talk) 11:20, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Newinwiki8 It will reviewed by other volunteers, that area is typically not my speciality. Sohom (talk) 15:49, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-29

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:06, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Brave (web browser) has passed

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Brave (web browser) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of GalStar -- GalStar (talk) 18:03, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this not an article?

[edit]

Should exist. 125.48.50.55 (talk) 13:13, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What is not a article ? Sohom (talk) 18:15, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections | Discussion phase

[edit]
Administrator Elections | Discussion phase

The discussion phase of the July 2025 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • July 18–22 - Discussion phase (we are here)
  • July 23–29 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • July 30–c. Aug 3 - Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/Discussion phase.

On July 23, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close again to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's totals during the election. You must be extended confirmed to vote.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last approximately four days, or perhaps a little longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (you may want to watchlist this page) and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and must also have received a minimum of 20 support votes. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 July 2025

[edit]
  • Traffic report: God only knows
    Wouldn't it be nice without billionaires, scandals, deaths, and wars?

PageTriageUserspaceLogger and PRODs

[edit]

For some reason PTUL logged my PROD of Joseph Friebert (disambiguation) as an AfD nomination... maybe you should look into this? mwwv converseedits 18:18, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July thanks

[edit]
story · music · places

Thank you for improving article quality in July! - Three Ukrainian topics were on the main page today, at least at the beginning, RD and DYK, - see my talk. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:16, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On Bach's day of death, I decorated my user pages in memory of his music, and my story ends on "peace". --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:54, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-30

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:39, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections | Voting phase

[edit]
Administrator Elections | Voting phase

The voting phase of the July 2025 administrator elections has started and continues until July 29 at 23:59 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • July 23–29 – Voting phase
  • July 30–c. Aug 3 – Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for approximately four days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers

[edit]

Thank you for the message and for reverting it. — Sadko (words are wind) 15:42, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No issues! Sohom (talk) 15:47, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-31

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:23, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Godot Wild Jam

[edit]

Can you indicate what the claim to notability was on Godot Wild Jam, as I sure don't see it. At all. Fram (talk) 12:07, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The claim of significance was that it was one of the oldest Godot game engine game jams. Note that WP:A7 does not require demonstrating notability, just a claim to significance. WP:A7 should be considered a mechanism for backdoor deletion. Sohom (talk) 12:18, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This "claim to significance" is not even mentioned in the article. So there was no claim to significance (and even then, being "one of the oldest" is not a claim to significance anyway). Fram (talk) 12:35, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I did a cursory Google search to understand the article subject, but that is because I happen to work on open-source software and programming and tend towards finding ways of documenting and (potentially) saving articles about cool programming projects/initiatives. Sohom (talk) 12:58, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So you ignored A7 and the actual article because you like the subject. That's awfully close to WP:INVOLVED. Perhaps stick to things you can neutrally assess and not ones you like. Fram (talk) 13:10, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:A7 requires significance, I went out of my way to look for significance. Yes, that is more work than what WP:A7 requires, but I think it still adheres to the spirit of the law rather than the exact letter. I don't think my assessment after doing a cursory Google search was necessarily wrong. Also, I did not ignore deletion policy here and I for the most part have agreed with your overall assessment that the article should be deleted (and voted as such in the deletion discussion). I do not think I did anything wrong from the POV of WP:INVOLVED. Just because I work in programming does not suddenly disqualify me from adminning on everything programming related. I generally defer to other folks (from a administration POV) in areas that I'm actually involved in IRL (particularly web security, privacy and web browsers in general etc). Sohom (talk) 13:30, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
But you didn't find any significance anyway. And you claimed those things were in the article, which wasn't true. Being "one of the oldest" nor getting a nod of approval from someone from the actual engine (not an independent source, and not really a reliable one either) is indicating any significance. I don't get why you want to waste community time on this when you could have either deleted it or let it to someone less a priori enthusiastic to deal with it. I sure don't get why you would suggest merging something without any reliable independent source about it. We don't just include things because we like them or we think they are cool, and we shouldn't go around suggesting to newbies that this is an acceptable thing to do. Fram (talk) 13:39, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"Significance" is potential for notability. A project could have been notable because it is "one of the oldest". If this was any event but a game jam being "one of the oldest" would typically have encountered some coverage in tech RS (imo?). The way I interpreted that source in the moment was "oh wait Godot talks about this in their blog and I've heard about it, maybe this has some promise/potential in terms of notability". On a further evaluation, that intuition turn out to be wrong and I have since said that this should be deleted.
As I said in the AFD, what I meant when I said "merge" was to include a section about game jams in general on the page about Godot game engine and include a mention about the wild game jam (through the source I pointed to). I agree that "merge" was probably the wrong word to use in that context (in my defense, it was 8 o'clock in the morning and my first few admin actions in a hot second) but it was still a semi-accurate description of what I wanted the person to do. I did not see that they were a relatively new user and would have worded my response differently if I had realized that.
We don't just include things because we like them or we think they are cool, agreed! I have no intention of platforming non-notable stuff on Wikipedia even if they are stuff that I find cool. (I've written about notable stuff I find cool at Cross-site leaks or Site isolation and I do intend to continue doing that though) In this case, I justed wanted to give a event the benefit of doubt/second chance in a area where I know mainstream coverage is kinda hard to come by. Hope that clears up my intentions here and where my head was at. I'll take care to be more through with my evaluations and more descriptive in my communications with newbies going forward. Sohom (talk) 14:20, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DCWC August update

[edit]

We're a month into the 2025 Developing Countries WikiContest, with stiff competition at the top of the leaderboard already! Our current top five contestants are:

  1. Spookyaki (submissions) – 256 points, mostly from a handful of GAs about women's history in Latin America as well as the 1991 Haitian coup d'état.
  2. vigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions) – 229 points, back with a number of articles on abortion in various African countries.
  3. simongraham (submissions) – 213 points, mainly from GAs on species of jumping spiders in both Africa and Azerbaijan.
  4. El Salvador PizzaKing13 (submissions) – 200 points, with five GAs on articles relating to Salvadoran politics, history, and griddle cakes.
  5. Bosnia and Herzegovina BeanieFan11 (submissions) – 168 points from a few GAs, a few DYKs, and a few ITNs on athletes from a variety of countries.

Looking for ways to climb up the leaderboard yourself? Help out your fellow participants by answering a few review requests, particularly the older entries. Several more nominations needing attention are listed at eligible reviews, and highlighed entries receive a 1.5× multiplier!

On behalf of the coordinators, we'd like to thank all the participants for helping to combat systemic bias on Wikipedia! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Arconning (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:36, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-32

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 03:37, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CSD tag

[edit]

Are you testing with this tag? Because it's showing up at CAT:SD.-- Ponyobons mots 21:04, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, my bad, removed. Sohom (talk) 21:13, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It was a head scratcher. All good.-- Ponyobons mots 21:24, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – August 2025

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2025).

Administrator changes

added
removed

CheckUser changes

removed

Oversight changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, a new speedy deletion criterion, G15, has been enacted. It applies to pages generated by a large language model (LLM) without human review.
  • Following a request for comment, there is a new policy outlining the granting of permissions to view the IP addresses of temporary accounts. Temporary account deployment on the English Wikipedia is currently scheduled for September 2025, and editors can request access to the permission ahead of time. Admins are encouraged to keep an eye on the request page; there will likely be a flood of editors requesting the permission when they realize they can no longer see IP addresses.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Wikimania 2025 is happening in Nairobi, Kenya, and online from August 6 to August 9. This year marks 20 years of Wikimania. Interested users can join the online event. Registration for the virtual event is free and will remain open throughout Wikimania. You can register here now.

[edit]

Hi since you are a knowledgeable developer weighing in on various matters on the village pump, I thought you might have an answer to this. Is there a tool or gadget or request system to surface some inbound referrer data for external links to an article? e.g. in https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=all-agents&redirects=0&start=2025-07-22&end=2025-08-06&pages=Odessa_pogroms, I can see a spike in the page views in the last week or two. Is there a way to find out where they are coming from? Andre🚐 17:54, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@AndreJustAndre There is toolforge:wikinav which gives you click-stream data, but it looks like it is stuck on June 2025 data. That being said, we have anonymized click stream data across a month at [18] so you could possibly write a script to check the anonymized referrer data across July to August. That being said, I don't think it can be used to find the exact referrers used in the spike, since the data is anonymized and aggregated over a month and we don't have any (non-NDA) tools that provides that data at the granularity or a day (or even a couple of days) at the moment. Sohom (talk) 20:42, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 9 August 2025

[edit]

(This message was sent to User talk:Sohom data and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Tech News: 2025-33

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:26, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SodiumBot

[edit]

Hi, has something recently changed with the configuration of SodiumBot? My watchlist is set to exclude bot edits, but this morning edits by SodiumBot (FRS notifications) are displaying. Thanks. Schazjmd (talk) 14:05, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think SodiumBot has the bot flag set yet. Will probably need to ping a friendly/active crat for that. See Wikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approval/Approved :( Sohom (talk) 14:09, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-34

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:34, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Liquid Glass has passed

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Liquid Glass has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Crispybeatle -- Crispybeatle (talk) 12:47, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

story · music · places

Congratulations to more quality content, with a story about a singer --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:09, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Check out my talk for an Independence day, or: the pic of Oksana Lyniv was taken on 24 August. There's listening and reading in today's story, and I like both. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:19, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ooh, I'll check it out! Sohom (talk) 16:55, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! - On top of my talk: birthday of a great violinist and Requiem for a great friend. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:45, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing unwanted redirects in PD2

[edit]

Hello, @Sohom Datta... Please fix any redirect issues in PD2 because there is a unwanted redirects into The Princess Diaries 2: Royal Engagement. Thanks.... 158.140.164.22 (talk) 09:51, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This not a area I typically look at, I'll let some other volunteer handle this. Sohom (talk) 16:04, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol September 2025 Backlog drive

[edit]
September 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 September 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:32, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-35

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:09, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

BAGBot: Your bot request SodiumBot 2

[edit]

Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/SodiumBot 2 as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT 01:57, 26 August 2025 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.[reply]

Brain

[edit]
Screenshot of the UserWatchlist script

Lemme steal your brain for a little bit. There is obviously a reason why this hasn't been implemented (right? it is such an obvious feature that its omission means they don't want stalkers, right?). Do you think the world will explode if I release it? Is there something similar out there? There must be, right? But I don't see anything on Wikipedia:User_scripts/List#Watchlist_and_recent_changes.

So basically it takes the most recent diffid, stores it in localStorage, compares it. I have something similar in Java which can send me push notifications. It is probably possible to send a push notification from a Tampermonkey script but I was too lazy to google it. Polygnotus (talk) 06:44, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Polygnotus, There isn't anything similar out there to best of my knowledge. I don't think the world would explode, but you might get folks who would ask you to gate it behind specific permissions (admin for example) or in a worst case scenario MFD it if there is evidence of clear abuse using the script. Things won't explode, but they might get messy fast and the WMF does not want to get into the mess. Sohom (talk) 13:32, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
How do I gate a javascript behind specific permissions? Is there a snippet somewhere I can steal? Also, wouldn't it be real easy to strip out whatever code I put in to restrict it? mw.config.get('wgUserGroups').includes('sysop'); is pretty unsophisticated and easy to remove. Polygnotus (talk) 13:34, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Polygnotus Gate it behind a if statement like so,
if ( mw.config.get( 'wgUserGroups' ).indexOf( 'sysop' ) !== -1 ) {
  // do something
} else {
  // you are not a admin, don't do the admin-only thing
}
Sohom (talk) 13:39, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Polygnotus Yes, it is easy to remove, but so will almost everything else (outside of obfuscating the JS code). The real reason folks won't be removing the check is peer pressure/fear of being blocked (case to the point, the AWB check is trivial to bypass if you know a bit of game hacking, but the reason folks don't do it is because they would be blocked if they did. Sohom (talk) 14:29, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well it is pretty difficult to detect if someone is running a Tampermonkey script, unless someone spends their finite life looking at API logs; a fate worse than hell. For some reason I can't find the wgUserGroup 'hasClue'.
Also getting AWB permission is pretty damn easy, I think that is also a deterrent.
Thanks, I'll sleep on it. Perhaps a fun idea for the WMF watchlist project. Polygnotus (talk) 19:42, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
One more stupid question. Can we run User:Yapperbot/Pruner on all those WikiProjects with memberlists that are usually years out of date? Based on my calculations at least 50% of people listed as members of a WikiProject are inactive. And that makes those Wikiproject pages far less useful because you can't even find who to talk to on, for example, Wikiproject:Windmills in Belarus. The only downside is that some WikiProjects have an "inactive" users section; I am happy to remove all those manually (they add nothing of value) or add a html comment so the bot knows to skip em and have the bot deal with the rest. Ideally they would be sorted based on usercount, and even more ideally use a weighted-sort based on usercount in the specific topic (quarry:history/94218/1013390/982681). But pruning all the dead wood is a great step in the right direction. I can do it too, with User:Polygnotus/Scripts/FilterInactiveOrBlocked.js but it would be nicer to have a bot do it regularly. I've never tried Go. In these participants sections they sometimes use ordered lists, sometimes they use unordered lists, sometimes they add 1 sentence descriptions after their username, so the bot needs some minor tweaks. Thanks, Polygnotus (talk) 06:45, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Polygnotus, Pruner is opt-in, so what you need to do is to follow the instructions at User:Yapperbot/Pruner and add User:Yapperbot/Pruner/use to WikiProject list. Sohom (talk) 14:54, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Also, can we stick a link to Help:INTERWIKI in MediaWiki talk:Interwiki intro? I have never understood why special pages don't link to the relevant explanation. Thanks, Polygnotus (talk) 09:21, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this, MediaWiki:Interwiki intro already has a link to that page (on the word interwiki linking). Sohom (talk) 13:35, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2025 September newsletter

[edit]

The fourth round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 29 August. The penultimate round saw three contestants score more than 800 points:

Everyone who competed in Round 4 will advance to Round 5 unless they have withdrawn. This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far, while the full scores for Round 4 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 9 featured articles, 12 featured lists, 98 good articles, 9 good topic articles, more than 150 reviews, nearly 100 did you know articles, and 18 in the news articles.

In advance of the fifth and final round, the judges would like to thank every contestant for their hard work. As a reminder, any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed in Round 5. In addition, note that Round 5 will end on 31 October at 23:59 UTC. Awards at the end of Round 5 will be distributed based on who has the most tournament points over all five rounds, and special awards will be distributed based on high performance in particular areas of content creation (e.g., most featured articles in a single round).

Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges – Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), Frostly (talk · contribs), Guerillero (talk · contribs) and Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) – are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck!

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request for advice

[edit]

Hello Sohom Datta, Good day to you. I wish to refer to my request for Autopatrolled rights in March 2025 and to the comments you made when declining same. Although I have not created an article and developed it to GA or B-class, I have made significant contributions towards improving the articles on Trinity College, Kandy ([48]) and Bradby Shield Encounter ([49]) articles. I would be grateful if you could kindly advise me whether these efforts address the concerns raised by you. Please be assured that I shall not regard any advice you provide as implicit approval. Best regards. QEnigma 07:57, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@QEnigma While I do think the work you've done is admirable I think what I had in mind was a stress on the "created" part of the creation part of a article. That being said, you do have permanent NPR, and given that I'd suggest reapplying for the right, since you seem to be overall closer than you were last time. Sohom (talk) 01:06, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. QEnigma 01:10, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-36

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:46, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Movie of advantage

[edit]

Ashirafa0 102.85.206.97 (talk) 20:45, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Huh ? Sohom (talk) 21:13, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Editor of the Week

[edit]
Editor of the Week
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:TechnoSquirrel69 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

You're telling me Sohom Datta (talk · contribs · count · logs) hasn't been Editor of the Week yet?! Sohom seemingly does it all. As a developer, he's worked on all kinds of handy things: the PageTriage extension here on the English Wikipedia, ProofreadPage — the software that makes Wikisource tick — and many other indispensable (ha!) tools. Since last year, he's been a member of the Product and Technology Advisory Council, which collaborates with the Wikimedia Foundation with the aim of improving software quality across the projects. Relatedly, I've been increasingly seeing him in heated discussions employing his technical expertise and voice of reason to turn dumpster fires into productive conversations. However, he's also a seasoned content writer; he's created several articles on technical subjects like Site isolation and Cookie stuffing, and it was my pleasure to collaborate with him on Cross-site leaks and Frutiger Aero. We need more editors like Sohom, and I hope you'll join me in expressing our appreciation of his work. This nomination was seconded by DreamRimmer, Bunnypranav, Saltymagnolia, QuicoleJR, Vacant0, HouseBlaster and Vanderwaalforces

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}
participates at Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer security
Sohom Datta
 
Editor of the Week
for the week beginning September 7, 2025
He has worked on all kinds of handy things: the PageTriage extension here on the English Wikipedia, ProofreadPage — the software that makes Wikisource tick — and many other indispensable tools. He is a seasoned content writer and has been a member of the Product and Technology Advisory Council, which collaborates with the Wikimedia Foundation to improve software quality across the projects. Most importantly, he employs his technical expertise and voice of reason to turn dumpster fires into productive conversations.
Recognized for
being handy
Notable work(s)
Site isolation, Cookie stuffing , Cross-site leaks and Frutiger Aero.
Submit a nomination

Thanks again for your efforts! Buster Seven Talk (UTC) 14:57, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

oooh, thank you so much! This made my day. @TechnoSquirrel69 @DreamRimmer, @Bunnypranav, @Saltymagnolia, @QuicoleJR, @HouseBlaster, @Vanderwaalforces thank you so much for your kind words :) This means a lot! Sohom (talk) 16:37, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You truly deserve all the appreciation. – DreamRimmer 16:40, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
+1 this is a small token of appreciation when compared to what you do on a daily basis. You absolutely deserve it :) HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 16:47, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Like HB said. (Also, this didn't make your week? I'm quitting everything. /s) TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:07, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That as well lol :) Sohom (talk) 22:35, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Congrats! Sophisticatedevening(talk) 02:08, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations! And you deserved this long ago! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 03:00, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – September 2025

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2025).

Administrator changes

readded Euryalus
removed

Interface administrator changes

readded Ragesoss

CheckUser changes

readded AmandaNP
removed SQL

Oversight changes

readded AmandaNP

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC is open on whether use of emojis with no encyclopedic value in mainspace and draftspace (e.g., at the start of paragraphs or in place of bullet points) should be added as a criterion under G15.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case Article titles and capitalisation 2 has been closed.
  • An RfC is in progress to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the Arbitration Committee election and resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.

The Signpost: 9 September 2025

[edit]

Tech News: 2025-37

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:11, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ebrima

[edit]

Wagne 197.148.77.39 (talk) 21:23, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OWID visualization updates

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Hey Sohom so we have 1) add DOMPurify to address XML issues[60] 2) fixed the variable shapes of the play button on different machines 3) when visualizations are played they no longer jump to the top of the page and they properly return to the section the user was at when closed. Additionally User:Ragesoss has agreed to keep stuff uptodate on EN WP as we continue to make improvements. Let me know if there are other requirements you see as critical before reopening discussion. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:32, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll go through the code later today (or tmrw) and let you know! Sohom (talk) 16:31, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Posted here Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#Activating_an_interactive_OWID_experience_(Part_4) for more feedback. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:47, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Now that we have dealt with the security concerns can we return this to being on by "default"[61] so we can put on 5 to 10 or so articles to get further feedback from the movement? By the way have it functional on my user page User:Doc_James#OWID. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:01, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Removed, I have some additional (non-security) concerns surrounding UI (I consider it a dead-end UI that will lead folks away from the encyclopedic content into OWID data) (Note, that it does not apply to commons since we are effectively just making commons content more engaging) but those are my personal opinion and it looks like that is in the minority here, per that I have vacated by edit removing the default flag since the major security issues have been addressed. Sohom (talk) 22:12, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Administrator Elections | RFC phase

[edit]

The RFC phase of the July 2025 administrator elections has started. There are 10 RFCs for consideration. You can participate in the RFC phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/RFCs.

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:43, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:199.192.122.199 is misusing their talk page again

[edit]

Hi Sohom. A few months ago you pblocked User:199.192.122.199 for misusing their talk page. They are at it again. Considering you helped me deal with them in the past, would you mind seeing to this again? Have a good day. RedactedHumanoid (talk) 21:44, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Sohom (talk) 16:30, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:RFP/AWB

[edit]

Howdy. I see you are one of those who has previously granted AWB permission. I’ve been waiting a few days and haven’t gotten any feedback. Wondering if you might have a moment to take a look at my request. Sorry for being impatient. Just have a number of tasks I’m looking to perform. Thanks in advance. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:49, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actioned some of it! Sohom (talk) 19:57, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Filter

[edit]

Thanks for the work on the filter. However, it seems to be blocking URLs of sources being discussed on the talk page e.g. [62], and I'm unsure whether that behavior is desirable. Pinging User:Very Polite Person and User:Zzuuzz. EEng 20:10, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@EEng That link was a different issue that has since been fixed. I'll check if bare URLs get caught, but in general, properly formatted citations should not trigger the filter. Sohom (talk) 20:18, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I think the example I linked was triggered by a bare URL (or maybe there was plain text of the name in there as well, and that was the true trigger). Since bare URLs are common in talk-page discussions, I wanted to raise the point. EEng 20:22, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That ping didn't work for me. You may want to look into that. There's another FP reported at EFPR. It'll take me some time to get my head around the logic and regex, but I wonder if we're counting properly? Over to you Sohom. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:52, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strange about the ping, because I specifically redid the ~~~~ when I added you [63]. EEng 21:10, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but MediaWiki decided that you were only changing the time (you need to add a newline and add a signature for MediaWiki to consider it "ping eligible") Sohom (talk) 22:52, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@EEng and @Zzuuzz (and @Green Montanan) I think I've fixed the issues (required some nasty regex hacks) to make sure we caught everything properly (yes it was a counting problem) (also thanks to @Chaotic Enby for the help they gave offwiki with sanity checking some of the regexes) Sohom (talk) 21:51, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, your fix worked. I was able to add a reference that contains the suspect's name within the URL. Green Montanan (talk) 22:01, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I did not test to see whether the filter would allow the name to be within the title, but that's less critical, since the title can be "adjusted" to conform to the current consensus. Green Montanan (talk) 22:02, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think the regex will catch that, but I'll keep monitoring for false positives. Sohom (talk) 22:53, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, you win.

[edit]

Just unblock me. I won’t do it again. 199.192.122.199 (talk) 00:26, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have confidence you will resort to make disruptive edits, so no. Sohom (talk) 14:56, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Teamwork Barnstar
Thanks for the help today with the edit filter. :) Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 00:30, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Sohom (talk) 05:24, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, as explained at User talk:Thepharoah17#G5, G5 does not apply to these pages. Please restore this. plicit 14:31, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done (restored) I did one and then figured I needed to take a closer look, but looks like you got to it~ Sohom (talk) 14:34, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-38

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 17:03, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September thanks

[edit]
story · music · places

Thank you for improving article quality in September! - Today is the birthday of the 16th Thomaskantor after Bach, remembered. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:11, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Thanks for helping to clean up the extensive vandalism today. Liz Read! Talk! 03:58, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Sohom (talk) 04:00, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Himiw

[edit]

See WP:LTA/SB1. Tagging their pages for speedy deletion breaks their script (per WP:BEANS reason best not discussed publicly.) Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 04:12, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to send me a email! Sohom (talk) 13:34, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-39

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:52, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-40

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:49, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 2 October 2025

[edit]

Tech News: 2025-41

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 17:20, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unknown Edit Request Page

[edit]

Edit Page, I put in an edit request to this prompt but have heard nothing back. I don't see a way to track it or understand what I did. W00zles (talk) 00:01, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I can see what happened (kinda) -- Sohom (talk) 01:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – October 2025

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2025).

Administrator changes

removed

CheckUser changes

removed Vanamonde93

Arbitration

  • After a motion, arbitration enforcement page protections no longer need to be logged in the AELOG. A bot now automatically posts protections at WP:AELOG/P. To facilitate this bot, protection summaries must include a link to the relevant CT page (e.g. [[WP:CT/BLP]]), and you will receive talk page reminders if you forget to specify the contentious topic but otherwise indicate it is an AE action.

CropTool2

[edit]

We have forked the croptool so we can use our improvements / continue to improve it. Further details here. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:22, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Doc James I assume it is the same codebase (with improvements) but on a different server? Cool to see some work being done on this! (On the Unsupported Tools Working Group side of things I think we're looking at funding work on Video2Commons since y'all are doing a significant chunk of the work on CropTool and we didn't want to step on your toes!) Sohom (talk) 16:30, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yup same codebase with improvements as the current maintainer was not very responsive to our patches.
With respect to video, we have a patch almost ready to allow MP4s to upload and automatically convert to WebM within the upload Wizard. And we also supported the VideoCutTool that dose some of this. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:45, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Help

[edit]

Hello. I suppose you are an admin on this site. Can you please look into the edit disputes on the article List of current Indian governors. An user has been continuously changing the appropriate portraits used (cropped versions) and replacing them with random pictures just to differentiate between the same individuals holding two separate offices. I do not think it is constructive as well it just breaks the format of the table. Kindly look into it. Oritsu.me (talk) 03:36, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-42

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 18:56, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Hyprland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Malvertisement on a mobile phone.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Malvertisement on a mobile phone.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 07:50, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DCWC closing update

[edit]

Two weeks ago, the 2025 Developing Countries WikiContest came to a close! After three months of stiff competition at the top of the leaderboard, we have our winners. Bronze Belt Buckle – 3rd place vigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions), continuing his work on covering abortion in Africa, comes in third with 692 points. Silver Belt Buckle – 2nd place simongraham (submissions) comes in second with 763 points, largely from a slew of good articles about jumping spiders. And returning to the podium for the second year in a row, Gold Belt Buckle – 1st place Bosnia and Herzegovina BeanieFan11 (submissions) takes the Gold Belt Buckle with a mind-boggling 946 points from his series of articles on sportpersons. Congratulations to our winners!

Amazingly, the award for the most countries covered goes to both Bosnia and Herzegovina BeanieFan11 (submissions) and simongraham (submissions), who each submitted articles under 30 flags! Bosnia and Herzegovina BeanieFan11 (submissions) also wins for writing the most quality articles (16 good articles). For submitting 16 articles related to El Salvador, El Salvador PizzaKing13 (submissions) wins the award for most submissions under one country. The award for most submissions related to women goes to both Spookyaki (submissions) (7 biographies about women) and vigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions) (21 related articles). And for the second year, simongraham (submissions) wins for the most reviews, having submitted 21!

Among the participants' contributions were 2 FAs, 5 FLs, 124 GAs, and an uncounted number of DYKs, ITNs, and reviews of every kind! Regardless of your level of participation, every contestant can be proud to have contributed towards a major step in countering the systemic bias on Wikipedia. Every year, millions of readers and editors around the globe use Wikipedia to educate themselves and communicate with others about parts of the world that often receive less attention than they deserve. Thank you for participating with us in the contest and contributing to this effort. The DCWC will return next year, and we look forward to seeing you contribute again! However, before that...

We need your feedback! Join the conversation on the talk page to discuss your reflections on the contest (even if you didn't participate!) and help us make it better.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Arconning (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:43, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Sohom Datta. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-43

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:32, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October thanks

[edit]
story · music · places

Thank you for improving article quality in October! My latest: Roberta Alexander, - listen. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:36, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 October 2025

[edit]
  • Traffic report: One click after another
    Serial-killer miniseries, deceased scientist, government shutdowns and Sandalwood hit "Kantara" crowd the tubes.

Request

[edit]

Hi Sohom, could you please remove all my advanced PERMs for now? Thanks! Ophyrius (he/him
T • C • G
) 17:33, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, feel free to ask for them back if/when you need! Sohom (talk) 17:56, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-44

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:28, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agender flag colour

[edit]

Stupid question but the color of the flag in the infobox changes on Agender if you switch light mode to dark mode. I am using Wikipedia:Dark mode (gadget). Do you happen to remember the magic incantation? Thanks, Polygnotus (talk) 13:50, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Polygnotus, That should not happen. That flavor of dark mode does not apply any transformation on the image (unless you specify skin-invert-image explicitly which doesn't show up in the text) Sohom (talk) 15:24, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah but User:Polygnotus/common.css and ==>
It is pretty mysterious. I checked with a colorpicker. Polygnotus (talk) 16:26, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I do see a filter: "invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg)" and it is coming from MediaWiki:Gadget-dark-mode.css. Polygnotus (talk) 01:36, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Polygnotus I don't think the colors are inverting, the screenshots you show are the ones I see, the colors in the the flag are still the same, black, grey, white, green, white, grey, black in that order. In dark mode the black of the background bleeds into the black of the flag, but that should be expected. A hue inverted flag should be white, grey, black, dark green, black, grey, white like this image off to the side (I've explicitly added the skin-invert-image tag to it). Sohom (talk) 11:18, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
OK this is officially weird. I used my test account, turned on Wikipedia:Dark mode (gadget) in preferences, then went to Agender and switched from light to dark mode.
I confirmed with a colorpicker that the middle stripe was indeed a different color.
I disabled the invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) line in the webdev tools and it showed the flag correctly.
But when I do <div style="filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg);">[[File:Agender pride flag.svg]]</div> I get the same result you got.
Sometimes I worry that computers are intentionally messing with us. Polygnotus (talk) 11:46, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your post at WP:BN

[edit]

I think you are broadly correct, except I don't think Stewards would be excited to handle our routine +/-sysop activity. I don't really know what kind of fundamental changes to the crat role would achieve consensus, so my broad perspective is summed up at User:L235/RfB is no big deal: make being a bureaucrat a common thing that isn't a big deal. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 13:01, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Guide to temporary accounts

[edit]

Hello, Sohom Datta. This message is being sent to remind you of significant upcoming changes regarding logged-out editing.

Starting 4 November, logged-out editors will no longer have their IP address publicly displayed. Instead, they will have a temporary account (TA) associated with their edits. Users with some extended rights like administrators and CheckUsers, as well as users with the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right will still be able to reveal temporary users' IP addresses and all contributions made by temporary accounts from a specific IP address or range.

How do temporary accounts work?

Editing from a temporary account
  • When a logged-out user completes an edit or a logged action for the first time, a cookie will be set in this user's browser and a temporary account tied with this cookie will be automatically created for them. This account's name will follow the pattern: ~2025-12345-67 (a tilde, year of creation, a number split into units of 5).
  • All subsequent actions by the temporary account user will be attributed to this username. The cookie will expire 90 days after its creation. As long as it exists, all edits made from this device will be attributed to this temporary account. It will be the same account even if the IP address changes, unless the user clears their cookies or uses a different device or web browser.
  • A record of the IP address used at the time of each edit will be stored for 90 days after the edit. Users with the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right will be able to see the underlying IP addresses.
  • As a measure against vandalism, there are two limitations on the creation of temporary accounts:
    • There has to be a minimum of 10 minutes between subsequent temporary account creations from the same IP (or /64 range in case of IPv6).
    • There can be a maximum of 6 temporary accounts created from an IP (or /64 range) within a period of 24 hours.

Temporary account IP viewer user right

How to enable IP Reveal

Impact for administrators

  • It will be possible to block many abusers by just blocking their temporary accounts. A blocked person won't be able to create new temporary accounts quickly if the admin selects the autoblock option.
  • It will still be possible to block an IP address or IP range.
  • Temporary accounts will not be retroactively applied to contributions made before the deployment. On Special:Contributions, you will be able to see existing IP user contributions, but not new contributions made by temporary accounts on that IP address. Instead, you should use Special:IPContributions for this (see a video about IPContributions in a gallery below).

Rules about IP information disclosure

  • Publicizing an IP address gained through TAIV access is generally not allowed (e.g. ~2025-12345-67 previously edited as 192.0.2.1 or ~2025-12345-67's IP address is 192.0.2.1).
  • Publicly linking a TA to another TA is allowed if "reasonably believed to be necessary". (e.g. ~2025-12345-67 and ~2025-12345-68 are likely the same person, so I am counting their reverts together toward 3RR, but not Hey ~2025-12345-68, you did some good editing as ~2025-12345-67)
  • See Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer § What can and can't be said for more detailed guidelines.

Useful tools for patrollers

  • It is possible to view if a user has opted-in to view temporary account IPs via the User Info card, available in Preferences → Appearance → Advanced options → Tick Enable the user info card
    • This feature also makes it possible for anyone to see the approximate count of temporary accounts active on the same IP address range.
  • Special:IPContributions allows viewing all edits and temporary accounts connected to a specific IP address or IP range.
  • Similarly, Special:GlobalContributions supports global search for a given temporary account's activity.
  • The auto-reveal feature (see video below) allows users with the right permissions to automatically reveal all IP addresses for a limited time window.

Videos

Further information and discussion

Most of this message was written by Mz7 (source). Thanks, 🎃 SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 02:47, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Re User talk:97.79.218.3

[edit]

User talk:97.79.218.3 popped up in Category:Pages with disallowed DISPLAYTITLE modifications. I cleaned up, which was promptly undone by the IP. Anything you can do? Paradoctor (talk) 04:17, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yanked talk page access Sohom (talk) 05:49, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2025 November newsletter

[edit]

The 2025 WikiCup has come to an end. Our top scorers, based on the tournament point rankings (which can be seen here), are:

  1. Delaware BeanieFan11 (submissions) with 1,604 tournament points, will receive the 1st place award.
  2. English Island, South Australia Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1,075 tournament points, will receive the 2nd place award.
  3. Arconning (submissions) with 860 tournament points, will receive the 3rd place award.
  4. Canada History6042 (submissions) with 804 tournament points
  5. Sammi Brie (submissions) with 635 tournament points
  6. Oklahoma TheDoctorWho (submissions) with 386 tournament points
  7. AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) with 373 tournament points
  8. Thebiguglyalien (submissions) with 362 tournament points

Our high scorers in the final round were:

  • Delaware BeanieFan11 (submissions) with 1,035 round points, mostly from 19 good articles and 21 did you know articles about athletes
  • vigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions) with 819 round points, mostly from 13 good articles and 11 did you know articles about a wide range of topics from abortion topics to African cities
  • TheNuggeteer (submissions) with 508 round points from 9 good articles, 4 good topic articles and 6 did you know articles mainly about Philippines topics, along with 19 good article reviews

The final round was very productive, and contestants had 2 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 106 good articles, 5 good topic articles, 178 article reviews, 76 did you know articles, and 9 in the news articles. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

The top eight scorers will receive awards shortly. The following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. These prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field during the competition.

  • English Island, South Australia Gog the Mild (submissions) wins the featured article prize, with 12 featured articles total, and the featured topic prize, with 9 featured topic articles in total
  • Canada Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured list prize, with 10 featured lists total
  • AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) wins the featured picture prize, submitting the only featured picture in the entire contest during round 3
  • Canada History6042 (submissions) wins the featured content reviewer prize, with 127 featured content reviews. He will also share the ITN prize, with 20 in the news articles in total.
  • Delaware BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the good article prize, with 100 good articles total, and the DYK prize, with 147 did you know articles in total. He will also share the ITN prize, with 20 in the news articles in total.
  • Oklahoma TheDoctorWho (submissions) wins the good topic prize, with 16 good topic entries in total
  • Arconning (submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize, with 68 good article reviews in total

A special mention also goes to these users who scored the highest in a particular category in a single round:

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate. The WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2026 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!

On behalf of the judges, Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), Frostly (talk · contribs · email), Guerillero (talk · contribs · email) and Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs · email):

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:25, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.

Removed autopatrolled and new-page reviewer

[edit]

I don't recall when, if ever, that I would have used those features, so no great loss. As to the lists of ballparks articles, anyone who is interested in the subject is free to improve them. I created many of them, but I don't own them. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots06:01, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-45

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:31, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2025

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2025).

Administrator changes

added Toadspike
removed

CheckUser changes

added asilvering

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Pending

[edit]

Hi @Sohom Datta Could you please review my request at New Page Reviewer permission page? Kirokeer (talk) 18:23, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Will take a look. Sohom (talk) 13:37, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection indicators

[edit]

Hi, in case you haven't seen it: T12347#11342115 Matma Rex talk 19:53, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Block modified

[edit]

Hiya! Note that I modified your rangeblock here from a hard block to anon-only. It's a huge range with far too much collateral to hard block.-- Ponyobons mots 20:42, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough! Sohom (talk) 21:20, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 November 2025

[edit]

Tech News: 2025-46

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:36, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

December 2025 administrator elections - schedule

[edit]
  • The December 2025 administrator elections are set to proceed.
  • We plan to use the following schedule:
    • Nov 25 – Dec 1: Candidate sign-up
    • Dec 4 – Dec 8: Discussion phase
    • Dec 9 – Dec 15: SecurePoll voting phase
  • If you have any questions, concerns, or thoughts before we get started, please ask at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:47, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ACE MMS test

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-47

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 17:24, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November thanks

[edit]
story · music · places

Thank you for support in November! - On St. Cecilia's Day - patron saint of music - I remember a composition by Benjamin Britten, and have a woman on the main page who illustrated songs, with a sense of humour. My places take you to Milan, my first visit to La Scala, and music features our latest choral Abendlob, with English music. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:11, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Canticle I: My beloved is mine and I am his was a interesting read! Thanks for this! Sohom (talk) 02:11, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for reading! - Look, today's image, - she "portrayed" herself with her husband at the end of the table, - would have been good for Thanksgiving ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:55, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Creation backlog drive

[edit]

Hello Sohom Datta:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive in December!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than half a month of outstanding reviews from the current 2+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 December 2025 through 31 December 2025.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 3000 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:07, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-48

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 15:54, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

[edit]
The Barnstar for the Oops
Thank you for fixing my .css mistake! (in reference to [this edit]) Randomdude123459 | Talk | Contribs | 22:09, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections - Call for Candidates

[edit]

The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/December 2025/Candidates.

Here is the schedule:

  • November 25 – December 1 - Call for candidates
  • December 4–8 - Discussion phase
  • December 9–15 - SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

  • The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
  • Prospective candidates are advised to become familiar with the community's expectations of administrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for admin elections candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
  • The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.
  • The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.
  • Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. Later, a user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Turkey

[edit]
Buster7 has given you a turkey! Turkeys promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a turkey, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy Thanksgiving! Buster Seven Talk (UTC) 19:03, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the goodness of turkey by adding {{subst:Thanksgiving Turkey}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Happy Thanksgiving! :) Sohom (talk) 19:09, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

David Walter Horologist

[edit]

Hi Sohom I saw you removed my entry today.

NGS Arts (talk) 18:48, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@NGS Arts, It was AI generated (AI generated content is disallowed on Wikipedia) and did not explain why the person has a claim to importance. Note that inclusion into the encyclopedia, requires the person is notable among other things. I'd personally suggest that you try to recreate the article without the use of AI and use the article wizard and article for creation process so that experienced editors can guide you through the process and review your article. Sohom (talk) 18:55, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ok thanks - I'd written it from notes then put it through ChatGPT to check spelling and yr system took it as Ai so frustrating... won't do that again!! NGS Arts (talk) 18:59, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WWalter is highly regarded in the Horology world as a leading maker. He's been awarded for his work by several leading institutions along with quite a good amount of published articles so I am surprised at having to look at this. NGS Arts (talk) 19:01, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
NGS Arts has given you a turkey! Turkeys promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a turkey, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy Thanksgiving! NGS Arts (talk) 19:03, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the goodness of turkey by adding {{subst:Thanksgiving Turkey}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

NGS Arts (talk) 19:03, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 December 2025

[edit]
  • Comix: Madness
    It could happen to anyone.

Tech News: 2025-49

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 18:56, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections - Discussion Phase

[edit]

The discussion phase of the December 2025 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • Dec 4–8 - Discussion phase (we are here)
  • Dec 9–15 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/December 2025/Discussion phase.

On December 9, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's totals during the election. You must be extended confirmed to vote.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which typically lasts between a couple days and a week. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (you may want to watchlist this page) and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate who has not been recalled must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and must also have received a minimum of 20 support votes. A candidate that has been recalled must have at least 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]