Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alecto AI

Alecto AI

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Alecto AI (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While the founder of the organization, Breeze Liu, may be notable, the organization does not seem to be notable itself. Per consideration of the current article's sources and a WP:BEFORE, the organization is only mentioned in passing in relation to the founder's activism, but there is no in-depth coverage of the organization itself. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 00:06, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Companies, Artificial intelligence, United States of America, and California. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 00:06, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
• I'm not convinced on founder notability, but I guess I'm not fully convinced they're not notable either. Either way, this can be a redirect to Breeze Liu until someone nominates the article on her also. Alpha3031 (t • c) 09:30, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:10, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fade258 (talk) 01:31, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Delete - Breeze Liu's page is also not notable, dont bother making a redirect to an article that's gonna just get deleted later. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 01:37, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Delete Not finding independent significant coverage of the organization. I am also not convinced the founder is notable enough to justify a redirect as most news surrounding her relies on interviews and is difficult to consider secondary coverage. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 03:39, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Delete - search indicate lack of reliable independent sources ~2025-40055-65 (talk) 10:39, 11 December 2025 (UTC)