Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Companies

Shortcuts

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Companies. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Companies|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Companies. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from 2015) may be found at:

Purge page cache

watch

Companies

Joekels

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND, WP:SIRS. Refs are PR and run of the mill business news. scope_creep^Talk 07:35, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Companies, and South Africa. Zeibgeist (talk) 08:34, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ragic

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I shall not claim certainty, but this page seems to have low-level signs of AI-generation, and was previously deleted via Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ragic, and people may disagree with this but I feel there is reason to believe that the references contain nonsensical sources, not really fake but don't relate to the article in any way. R f q i i ^talk! 02:29, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Artificial intelligence, Computing, Software, and Taiwan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:42, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FIBO Group

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject doesn't meet WP:ORG notability requirements - there are many niche industry media reports, but nothing that qualifies as a significant coverage RS. Vgbyp (talk) 10:31, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Vgbyp (talk) 10:31, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, United Kingdom, and Caribbean. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 12:00, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

NUU mobile

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was recently restored by an admin after a soft deletion at the previous AFD. Immediately afterwards it was again tagged as G4, but that was declined since the process delete was soft. A few minutes later A7 and G11 tags were applied, and I deleted based on those. Since the page creator has contacted the last tagger about restoration, I've done so, but am now calling this second AFD. This is NOT a procedural nomination; IMHO the page doesn't tell us anything significant about the company except it's selling phones. BusterD (talk) 09:43, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. BusterD (talk) 09:43, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @BusterD, please tell me what I need to do. I'm not trying to cause any trouble. I can remove those tags. Garyplso (talk) 13:16, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure I can provide an answer for your question which will please you. Page creators are up against several guardrails the community has established in order to prevent utter chaos. Our five pillars set forth an expectation 1P) we are an encyclopedia, not a routine listing of electronics sellers, 2P) in our articles we take a neutral point of view, so we're not here to improve electronics sales, 3P) Wikipedia articles are free content, so anyone can write them, so anyone can change them later, 4P) wikipedians treat each other with respect and civility, even when rules are broken, and 5P) we have no set rules, but as a community we establish polices and guidelines to keep our project moving forward. In the case of article space we require a subject establish WP:Notability and WP:Verifiablity policies through demonstration of multiple reliable, indepth sources independent of (and directly detail) the subject. In the case of articles about companies, we have additional organization and company guidelines which prevent Wikipedia from becoming Yelp or LinkedIn. So the bar is high for such companies. IMHO, too high for the subject under discussion. This somewhat-adversarial articles for deletion discussion is where the pagecreator and supporters can provide evidence of the available sources. Often a paid- or otherwise connected author has access to a company clipping file, or is aware of sources which would qualify. Good luck. BusterD (talk) 14:07, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@BusterDThanks for your response. I'm working to improve it. Garyplso (talk) 15:44, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Texas. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 12:02, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the products might be notable, but the company isn't. There's probably enough WP:PRODUCTREV for a "reception" section to be filled out, at which point the article becomes encyclopedic. tech radar, PCMag, Digital trends (that one gives a 504 for me but it looks like it at least was significant coverage), a little bit at verge (not significant coverage though), tech radar again, PCMag again, Tom's guide. None of the current sources contribute anything, except maybe this, which might or might not be reliable (I haven't really investigated it). However, all the reliable sources I found are reviewing the company's products rather than the company itself, so this article fails WP:INHERITORG. I'm not sure whether Tracxn or pitchbook are reliable but they seem to fall under WP:CORPTRIV. TL;DR: notability is not inherited from the company's products. lp0 on fire () 14:33, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Lp0 on fire Thanks for your insights. Rather than focusing on the products, will just focus on the company itself. Thanks for your suggestion about pitchbook. Garyplso (talk) 15:46, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm dubious about the notability of the products, which would otherwise rise to a CCS for the company (i.e. in general, using the rule of thumb N -> CCS and CCS -> nothing for entities one step removed, the information on the products is not sufficient to avert an A7). In my opinion, the coverage shown in this discussion and the previous iteration of the article demonstrate only CCS for the products, and not notability. I am thus inclined to endorse the deletion of the article via our CSD rather than a full AFD. Alpha3031 (t • c) 08:16, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Biggie Switzerland

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. Searches turned up the companies own page and WP:ORGTRIV sources. --Seawolf35 ^T--C 22:18, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Switzerland. --Seawolf35 ^T--C 22:18, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Less than a dozen hits on Swissdox limited to WP:ORGTRIV, no WP:SIGCOV. Also, weirdly enough, was created with a perfectly de-wiki layout, down to the infobox template, before being translated, but no such article exists over there. YuniToumei (talk) 22:33, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:25, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and fails WP:NCorp Agnieszka653 (talk) 22:48, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gauthier Biomedical

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. A Google failed to yield sufficient coverage to ring the WP:N bell. Page is a stub with only one affiliated source. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:28, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Companies, and Medicine. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:28, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This seems to be little more than an advertisement. Athel cb (talk) 17:53, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:49, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note The article creator has not edited in almost 14 years. However, in 2011 they left a note on their talk page indicating a desire for the page to be deleted. -Ad Orientem (talk) 05:25, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Offset Software

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH with mentions being trivial announcements. I found some interviews [1] [2] but these are primary sources. I think it's a lot more likely Project Offset is notable instead as the studio's cancelled game. (Additional source) Unfortunately, this page has very little about Project Offset and a new article would need to be made to focus on said game. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 17:27, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Companies, and California. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 17:27, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom or redirect to S2 Games. Go D. Usopp (talk) 04:10, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PRISM+

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This company probably has *some* degree of notability, although I will see what other editors have to say. It is mainly an online entity that simply puts its branding on OEM parts, and the article reads very much like an advert. I just don't think it warrants its own article in its current state. Aleain (talk) 06:02, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

this very much reads like an advert — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nooled (talk • contribs) 08:15, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No sources. BlookyNapsta (talk) 08:42, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Bold text[reply]

I agree. Very obviously an advert Nooled (talk) 08:18, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The current state of the article does not meet WP:GNG, so WP:TNT applies here. BlookyNapsta (talk) 08:44, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TNT. Cortador (talk) 10:06, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Singapore. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:21, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:56, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GrooveWorx

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV all the way (complete lack of sources) and should be deleted. ConeKota (talk) 06:55, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Companies, and California. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:19, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maiyas Beverages and Foods

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Routine Announcement (WP:ROUTINE) Filmyy (talk) 06:40, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Companies, India, and Karnataka. Filmyy (talk) 06:40, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Soldiershop

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Found no independent sourcing to pass WP:NCORP. PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:23, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Companies. PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:23, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:59, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Military. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:22, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No secondary coverage. BlookyNapsta (talk) 08:54, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No WP:SIGCOV for the subject. Notability template from 2017 that has not been resolved is not a good sign. Kvinnen (talk) 22:27, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Miniboox

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found nothing in a search of sources (archive.org, google books, proquest, google) except for 1 or 2 company listings (which is very few). The first book used as a source does not actually mention the company, as far as I can tell (nothing in a text search or their indexes). The second source I could not check but given it was added by the person who added the first one I doubt it does either (and seems to predate the company?). Does not pass GNG or NCORP. PARAKANYAA (talk) 20:58, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, Companies, and Germany. PARAKANYAA (talk) 20:58, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I found an obviously non-RS youtube video that describes Miniboox as a modern spinoff of Miniaturbuchverlag Leipzig, and claims that the family has been making books since the late 19thC. Searching that company name on archive.org, I find non-sigcov directory listings as far back as 1993. However, I don't find Miniaturbuchverlag Leipzig in the 4,000 Years of Tiny Treasures. In ProQuest, I found a non-WP:NORG-qualifying one-sentence mention of Miniaturbuchverlag Leipzig's Moby Dick. Maybe if I could figure out how to spell the family name mentioned in that YouTube video, there'd be lots of thrilling 20thC coverage of this family business under yet another former name, but I can't find anything useful for either Miniboox or Miniaturbuchverlag Leipzig. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 23:33, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Checked Google Scholar too in case they were showing up in articles on miniature books -- nada, just two citations to individual Miniaturbuchverlag Leipzig editions with no mention of the publisher in the prose at all. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 23:38, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I checked German Wikipedia, too. No trace of Miniboox, although Miniaturbuchverlag Leipzig is mentioned a few times routinely. Brosticate (talk) 10:40, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Imperium Comms

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not yet notable per WP:CORP. A WP:BEFORE search turned up only press releases and passing mentions. They have some notable clients, but on Wikipedia notability is not inherited. The claim of pro bono work for an Emirati prince is a bit startling: pro bono, really? Is he strapped for cash this month? Hard times chez Qassimi? Wikishovel (talk) 08:37, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, and England. Wikishovel (talk) 08:37, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

not sure about the exact nature of it but the source mentioned it. might be some sort of emritization initative to support the UAE attract companies? Schumi19799 (talk) 08:51, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I did include several non press release sources related to this company and also the press gazette official ranking of the news site it owns. @Wikishovel: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schumi19799 (talk • contribs)

Delete, removing all the PR and SEO blackhat sources, there's almost nothing about the company. The "maybe they are the parent of this racing website" seems really odd. Sam Kuru (talk) 19:49, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have clarified their ownership of the racing site now and added some more sources. this is only the second page ive made so im not entirely sure about the threshold... feedback is appreciated.

Those are all the sources I'm able to find so I wont be making more edits. Schumi19799 (talk) 06:57, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As before, I've removed advertorials, blogs, and PR/SEO. None of those even make the claim that they "own" the other site, just that it's an advertising partner. I assume the same "entrepreneur" owns both, but that's not supported or material to this discussion. Please stop adding SEO sources - that's not helping. Sam Kuru (talk) 12:23, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I sent a message on your person talk package because i had some questions... please reply. also what exactly is an seo source? it all seems a bit arbitrary to me. Schumi19799 (talk) 13:56, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Kuru Schumi19799 (talk) 13:58, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay just to keep the conversation here, no need to post to my talk page. You're responded to the COI request that you have no connections to this small SEO/PR firm, which is presumably just a small number of people. Totally not you or your employer, for sure. Got it.

While The Khaleej Times is generally a fine source, the "KT Network" section of the site is paid placement without editorial controls (typically blackhat SEO and press releases).
iBusinessnews is a junk news-skinned SEO blog. The address is a "virtual office" and there are ads on the site for paid placement. Authors are just one or two bloggers, and most of it is LLM-generated. This is not in any way a RS.
Bitzuma is a disclaimed cryptoblog, we don't use those even for crypto-related concerns and certainly not to pretend they support PR/SEO startup notability
LinkedIn is just user-generated material with no editorial control. This one even links back to the KT material, which is just PR

I've also removed some sketchy material that seems to have nothing to do with the primary topic. Maybe the person that runs "Imperium Comms" also runs a random F1 fan site, but that's not clear from the source, nor does it impart any notability on the company. What you're left with is nothing but primary sources (links to the company and a user-generated bio for the owner). None of this meets WP:NCORP. Sam Kuru (talk) 03:17, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But if it's a PR does it even matter as long as it's confirming something in a reputable source? asking for future reference if i decide to make more pages, though it doesnt really seem worth the effort haha.

the source did say they own the site directly... it's not a "fan site", it's one of the largest f1 news sites globally and top 20 sports news in the UK... i did provide a press gazette source for this which I dont understand how you can call it sketchy when it's the most trusted source for reporting on the media industry.

just trying to get an understanding for future... strangely my first page creation went fine even though i only did 10 minutes research and provided just 2 sources.

is there anyway to propose a topic and get other wiki users thoughts before creating? Schumi19799 (talk) 08:02, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

for instance, can i make a page about Edelman or does that lack notability? Schumi19799 (talk) 08:08, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Press releases, advertorials, "guest posts", contributor blog posts on news sites are outside of the editorial controls and fact checking for publishers. They are not reliable sources for anything other than "the company said" claims, and often not even that. They are not independent and useless for determining notability, which is a significant hurdle for this company. No one cares about your F1 site.Sam Kuru (talk) 11:56, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a place to ask for editors feedback to check if a page can be suitable? or better yet, is there a place on wikipedia where editors have proposed pages that should be created??

I want to give making a page another crack but think it's best to do it for a topic thats already highlighted for creation by an editor so I know my hard work wont be for nothing. Schumi19799 (talk) 12:21, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Schumi19799. The best way to get editor feedback on a topic is to create the article in draft, as you did at Draft:Planet F1. That saves everyone time and effort. Wikishovel (talk) 12:27, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much I will have a look and find another topic. I wish other editors here were as helpful as you.... seems some of them think spending so many hours here and doing nothing else in life gives them a right to be condescending to newbies Schumi19799 (talk) 12:30, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome. I hope you stay on, and keep contributing. And I hope I'm never condescending to new editors, intentionally or otherwise. Have you seen Wikipedia:Requested articles yet? It's a giant set of requested articles that haven't been written yet. There are also WikiProjects with their own lists of requested articles: see Wikipedia:Teahouse/Suggestions. Join a WikiProject in a topic you're interested in, and they'll be glad of your help. Wikishovel (talk) 12:45, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requested articles is exactly what i am looking for. now I can make pages without worrying that theyll get deleted for lacking notability. thanks very much! Schumi19799 (talk) 13:19, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AngelHack

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability of WP:NCORP. Of the current sources:

Angelhack founder from self/founder (AngelHack),
Techcrunch 2013 not in-depth mention from WP:TECHCRUNCH
KrASIA interview, primary, not in depth
Angelhack website primary source
SFist not reliable source (aggregator), not significant coverage

Of other sources out there

WCPO not in depth
USA Today sponsored content
Business Insider 2011 does not feel reliable source nor significant coverage - mostly seems very primary
Wamda 2016 no WP:ORGDEPTH
Korea Post 2025 no depth

—🌊PacificDepths (talk) 23:05, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, and California. —🌊PacificDepths (talk) 23:05, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Metrodora Institute

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I’m nominating this article because the available sources don’t seem to show lasting notability. Most coverage is launch-focused and centered on the founders, with little independent reporting on the clinic’s actual operations, impact, or its closure. Since the clinic has already shut down and there isn’t substantial in-depth coverage, it appears to fall short of the notability guidelines.

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Utah. Shellwood (talk) 18:58, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 December 6. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:03, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Mccapra (talk) 19:08, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:18, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because notability is not temporary. While most of the coverage was centered around the launch, several publications have covered it in 2024 and 2025, including Metrodora Institute Delivers Care For Neuroimmune Axis Disorders In A Boldly Feminine Setting (2024) and several paragraphs on Metrodora in Fortune (Instacart boss Fidji Simo was the first member of her family to graduate from high school...) in 2025. I created this article and I believe it's worth keeping in Wikipedia, if only barely. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 01:27, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Salubata

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article appears to lack independent and reliable coverage in major areas. Most sources are press releases, awards announcements, or niche blogs; so likely to fail WP:GNG, WP:NCORP.

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Fashion, and Environment. Shellwood (talk) 18:57, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 December 6. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:05, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Nigeria, France, and United States of America. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:09, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- lack of enough SIGCOV sources even with additional searches to suggest notability.Lorraine Crane (talk) 18:40, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chaayos

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable cafe chain. The article was created by a SPA and later expanded by another SPA, which indicates possible UPE & COI. The subject clearly fails WP:CORP & WP:ORG notability guidelines.

The cited sources consist largely of routine coverage, primary interviews, promotional pieces, and non-independent features that do not provide the significant, in-depth coverage required for notability. There is no sustained analysis of the company’s impact, controversy, or influence within third-party reliable media. Zuck28 (talk) 18:51, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Business, Companies, India, and Delhi. Zuck28 (talk) 18:51, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -

https://news.trust.org/item/20191125074639-n1tc0#:~:text=BANGKOK%2C%20Nov%2025%20,of%20laws%20to%20protect%20privacy

https://www.vice.com/en/article/indian-cafe-using-facial-recognition-without-customers-consent-sparks-calls-for-better-privacy-laws/#:~:text=Make%20Us%20Preferred%20In%20Top,Stories

https://qz.com/india/999604/chaayos-a-cafe-chain-that-is-giving-indians-exactly-what-they-want-the-perfect-cup-of-chai

https://www.forbesindia.com/article/how-we-survived/little-chaos-more-chaayos/65501/1

https://www.livemint.com/companies/news/smfg-india-credit-rebuild-strategy-japanese-promoter-leadership-shift-11765168613473.html

https://theprint.in/india/chaayos-under-fire-for-using-facial-recognition-tech-at-outlets-without-customer-consent/324637/#:~:text=New%20Delhi%3A%20Chaayos%2C%20the%20multi,recognition%2C%20allegedly%20without%20customer%20consent

https://www.hindustantimes.com/trending/singapore-envoy-slams-gurgaon-cafe-for-tasteless-chai-chaayos-ceo-responds-101734230483484.html#:~:text=Singapore%E2%80%99s%20High%20Commissioner%20to%20India%2C,earthen%20cup

https://retail.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/food-entertainment/food-services/chaayos-raises-53-million-for-business-expansion/92407609#:~:text=Image%20Tea%20%2042%20Chaayos,46%20and%20Think%20Investments World.is.1ne (talk) 09:26, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Per nom. Svartner (talk) 09:33, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:PROMO Agnieszka653 (talk) 05:12, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom.ShawMindMiner (talk) 10:04, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning Keep- though the sources may need some cleanups to improve, additional searches show it to be featured quite well, found 56 and 57 as possible additions.Lorraine Crane (talk) 19:58, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pinoy Auto Trader

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Shortlived company that lasted just 15 months; article supported by lots of churnalism and recycled press releases in sector media, but I don’t think this passes WP:NORG. Mccapra (talk) 13:39, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Internet, and Philippines. Mccapra (talk) 13:39, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:58, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:25, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:NORG. As stated by nom, the only coverage comes from press releases. RedShellMomentum ☎ ✎ 03:31, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Aneirinn (talk) 21:00, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- the one from the Inquirer seems the closest of the SIGCOV, however current sources and even additional checks show mostly of its being bought by another company.Lorraine Crane (talk) 21:52, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Zimmer Radio

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think this single-city radio station group meets WP:CORP, though the individual stations are notable. Worth noting: I actually expected an article on another Zimmer Radio. This company is an offshoot of a different, family-related company which owns stations in other Missouri markets (principally Columbia and Springfield; they were founded in Cape Girardeau) and is historically larger than the Joplin Zimmer group. There may be enough coverage for it, given that it existed for a longer period of time, but I am not sure. There is also an important court decision this year in a case titled Zimmer Radio of Mid-Missouri, which again is not the Joplin group. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 08:53, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Companies, and Missouri. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 08:53, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I recommend keeping the article but rewriting it in a neutral tone, adding more independent sources, and clearly distinguishing this Joplin group from other Zimmer Radio entities. If stronger independent coverage for the group as a whole cannot be found, consider merging verifiable material into articles for the individual stations or the parent company. SanneMonte (talk) 16:19, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bakeys

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources to meet WP:NCORP. WP:PROMO, Filmyy (talk) 06:09, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Companies, India, and Telangana. Filmyy (talk) 06:09, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ID Fresh Food

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Filmyy (talk) 05:57, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Companies, India, and Karnataka. Filmyy (talk) 05:57, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vikram Solar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is not automatic in WP:LISTED case. Fails to meet WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH Filmyy (talk) 05:51, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, India, and West Bengal. Filmyy (talk) 05:51, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Sourcing in the article already seems adequate, though it could be argued that it is mostly routine business transactions. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 15:55, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KeeeepBold text sirr Vikram Solar 20 years old, share market listed company, why why deletion.https://m.economictimes.com/markets/stocks/news/vikram-solar-shares-in-spotlight-as-3-month-lock-in-ends-today-93-lakh-shares-available-to-trade/articleshow/125451733.cms https://www.business-standard.com/markets/news/vikram-solar-shares-rise-3pc-on-commissioning-new-plant-in-tn-details-here-125112600307_1.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maazoz (talk • contribs) 15:02, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:32, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep Based on the significant coverage in the analyst report available online [3] it seems to pass NCORP.ShawMindMiner (talk) 10:11, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Futtaim Contracting

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of significant coverage for this company. JTtheOG (talk) 05:27, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Engineering, and United Arab Emirates. JTtheOG (talk) 05:27, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom, significant coverage is lacking.ShawMindMiner (talk) 10:07, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Forsalebyowner.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems like another non-WP:NCORP, WP:CORPTRIV-sourced company article; on top of that it's written like a product summary/advertisement. The only thing I could see that possibly evidences notability here is the lawsuit, but there doesn't seem to be enough SIGCOV to create an article. A GNews search turns up a lot of predictable passing/CORPTRIV stuff, and a GScholar search turns up some passing mentions in papers about FSBO sales in general, but not any sigcov about this site itself. Maybe its content could be included into For sale by owner as an ATD if deletion isn't preferred? Athanelar (talk) 02:18, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Companies. Athanelar (talk) 02:18, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Websites and United States of America. jolielover♥talk 03:15, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Illinois, Michigan, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:06, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted garbage page no gng meeting criteria, just deletion is okay. 15:05, 6 December 2025 (UTC)Maazoz (talk)
Delete - The article doesn’t have enough independent, reliable coverage to show lasting notability. The 2003 lawsuit is the only potentially notable part, but unless there are strong sources highlighting its impact, the content (including company history) would be better merged into For sale by owner or a general FSBO websites article. If anyone can provide solid, independent coverage, the notability case could be revisited; until then, deletion with merge seems appropriate. SanneMonte (talk) 16:20, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Rocket Companies#Subsidiaries, where appropriate short mention of it within its current company is already blended into that section; this article looks as if it hasn't really been touched in years outside the mention of said acquisition by Rocket outside of maintenance, general 'spam everything' real estate SPAs, and reverted COI edits. Nathannah • 📮 18:26, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Additionally It's a brand name for a company by the way, so if anything should be included on for sale by owner it should be only a 'not to be confused' template to make it clear at the top of the page. Nathannah • 📮 22:08, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - I did some digging (Google Books & Newspapers.com) and the company is likely notable but I don't plan on doing the WP:HEY and the information can be covered in Rocket Companies as already accomplished by Nathannah. As such, just need to create the redirect as an WP:ATD. For the hatnote, "for sale by owner" could have a disambiguation page since there are now five topics covered by that name. May be easier than a distinguish note. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:15, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I would certainly agree that if we decide on redirect, changing that hatnote would be much more proper. Nathannah • 📮 19:56, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See here. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:42, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Eska Water

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an article for a brand of bottled water. I don't believe that the references here assert notability under WP:NPRODUCT -- I previously draftified it, but it was moved back to mainspace without being accepted at AfC. The brand owner does not have an article to redirect this to, either. MediaKyle (talk) 20:15, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Canada. MediaKyle (talk) 20:15, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Eska has independent, reliable coverage about its operations and ownership, which meets WP:NPRODUCT. Countless bottled-water brands (example being Poland Spring) with similar sourcing have standalone pages. I can expand the article with stronger references if needed. Hayden Soloviev (talk) 20:21, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Companies. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:25, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
weak keep: Covered here [4], not the most flattering coverage, but it's coverage. Coverage here [5] and [6] Oaktree b (talk) 01:13, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Punjab Gramin Bank

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Originally moved back to draft due to the large WP:LLM content. I removed most of the content for being unsourced and/or promotional once it was moved back to mainspace. Sources are mainly brief mentions or routine coverage that does not meet WP:ORGCRIT. There are a few in-depth sources that cover a recent fraud that took place but not sure that would rise to making this notable. CNMall41 (talk) 16:48, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, and India. CNMall41 (talk) 16:48, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Punjab-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:30, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:PROMO, the recent fraud can also be seen as WP:NOTNEWS. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 21:56, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — there's nothing in the article that would get it past WP:NCORP. If better sources are found, please ping me. EmilyR34 (talk) 06:02, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Software company

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly written essay disguised as an article. Needs serious revamping to make it as an article. Go D. Usopp (talk) 13:51, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Go D. Usopp (talk) 13:51, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: While in the same basic topic area as the first nomination, this article was not a recreation per se — until 2019, this article was at Software houseSoftware house, and it has been around since 2003 — so it actually co-existed with the original Software company article that was deleted in 2006. That first AfD 19 years ago really ended as more of a "delete and redirect" to software industry, and presumably reinstating a redirect to there would be a perfectly valid alternative to deletion, but I have no opinion beyond that. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:58, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:58, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shrimper Records

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. The only sources I could find were the article's lone source. A Bay Bridged article from 2014 that's broken, and the rest of the sources I found were unreliable like Bandcamp or self funded or published sources. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 18:17, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Companies, and California. Shellwood (talk) 20:11, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Manhattan Street Capital

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not yet notable per WP:CORP, with no significant coverage found from reliable sources in a WP:BEFORE search. Sources cited so far are a Forbes "former contributor" piece (see WP:FORBES), a San Diego Business Journal article on Reg A+ services with a quote by the company's CEO, a "Top 10 Best" blog post mentioning the company, and a Business Wire press release. The only coverage I could find in RS was a passing mention of the company in an LA Times article [7], and another passing mention in an article about Reg A+ in the Wall Street Journal [8]. Apparent conflict of interest by article creator. Wikishovel (talk) 04:56, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, and California. Wikishovel (talk) 04:56, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - zero in-line references. Bearian (talk) 17:12, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It is only promotional. Aneirinn (talk) 17:25, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leicht-Mayer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Real, but could find no sigcov in any secondary source. NCORP fail. Fermiboson (talk) 21:37, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Switzerland. Fermiboson (talk) 21:37, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
TBH this is a WP:TNT as well. Article creator should stop using LLMs to edit. Either delete or draftify. Alpha3031 (t • c) 02:12, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I wrote the article. It could go to draftily. If anyone else other than me finds this topic interesting they can review it? Adamsecretxx (talk) 19:37, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Again, this is not the place for review, and "interesting topic" is not sufficient. Please take new articles through Articles for Creation where you will (hopefully) learn what the policies are for inclusion in Wikipedia. Lamona (talk) 18:10, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you.

it his a real company in Lausanne Svizerland. It is historical though. And it has not been subject to very big literary publications. So does it help if I edit to down to a smaller article? Adamsecretxx (talk) 19:36, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is no evidence that this company will meet WP:NCORP although there is also no reason why Adamsecretxx should not continue to work on this in their draft space. It should not come back to mainspace until it has been thoroughly vetted at WP:AFC. Lamona (talk) 18:16, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I´ll improve the article on my draftspace, and yes I'm aware that there are not a lot of publications that make the article note worthy. I understand what noteworthy is and what not. Wikipedia is not a place to publish personal research. I get it. Adamsecretxx (talk) 20:49, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Expat Asset Management

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Likely a WP:NEWLLM problem, where the creator has generated the article with AI and polished it up themselves (falls under the guideline as generated from scratch). Copy-and-paste move over from Draft:Expat Asset Management. mwwv ^converse∫_edits 14:37, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Bulgaria. Shellwood (talk) 14:59, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TNT and WP:NEWLLM. Seems like LLM spam and the latter half is full of telltale AI signs that I'm not sure if cleanup is possible here. If it's presumed to be notable, the creator or another editor can re-create without using AI and then it can be judged based on its own merits. HurricaneZeta^C 19:26, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This article was created by a person who contacted us for information and persmission to post it. It is not spam or AI generated, although it may have been redacted with an AI algorithm, which is very common these days and does not mean it was bot-generated. Its is a valid and true decription of our company's scope of activities. Best regards, Nicola Yankov, Chairman of the Board, Expat Asset Management. Nicola.yankov (talk) 07:13, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:41, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:TNT, as above. Needs to be entirely rewritten. Alpha3031 (t • c) 02:00, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: WP:TNT 🄻 🄰 14:28, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
COI disclosure: I am connected to the subject. The article has been rewritten since the nomination, and the previous version suspected of WP:NEWLLM issues has been replaced. The content in the text was reviewed and rewritten to eliminate potential AI-generated material- of course based on the subjective perception of the editor. Editors are invited to review the new version. Kaloyangarnev (talk) 08:23, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thameslink Southern Great Northern

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON, no WP:SIGCOV about this company yet, as there's not much really to be said about it. I don't know whether delete, redirect to Thameslink, Southern and Great Northern franchise or DfT Operator is the best option though. —Matrix _{ping me}^{when u reply} (t? - c) 20:20, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Transportation, and United Kingdom. —Matrix _{ping me}^{when u reply} (t? - c) 20:20, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the franchise makes the most sense to me, it's not clear this will even be needed once May 2026 comes around. SportingFlyer T·C 21:39, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:44, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the franchise for now as it is WP:TOOSOON to know what the actual operator will even be called come May 2026. There's nothing in the article actually about the future operator. // PYRiTEmonark // talk // 15:35, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - Obviously mention there as well at Thameslink, Southern and Great Northern franchise. At this point it is simply WP:TOOSOON.--CNMall41 (talk) 19:13, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify – I think the current page is more like a WP:DRAFT, I think we should reject the page back for now, until the operation works final transition.
Plus, I Oppose to Redirect to franchise or related pages, coz it's different between operator entity and franchise itself.

Awdqmb (talk) 05:00, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:34, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:SYNTH. Whilst it is true that there will obviously be a name for the publicly-owned service/franchise and a company has been registered in this name with an address in a government office, it's also true that the company is dormant and hasn't done anything since it was registered in 2020. It's a natural assumption that this is the company that will be used, but it's a logical leap and a guess given no announcement has been made. We don't do that. Wait until they've announced it and it's been reported in RS then we can have a page. Anything else about the future services can be added to other pages, it's not for us to put the carriage before the train, as it were. JMWt (talk) 04:06, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jasuben Pizza

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Jasuben Pizza appears to be a small local business whose coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources is limited and not sustained over time. Most coverage dates back to a handful of news articles around 2013, and there is no recent independent reporting or in-depth analysis to demonstrate broader significance or enduring notability. Some claims in the article are unverified or anecdotal. Under Wikipedia’s notability policies for organizations/businesses, the topic does not convincingly meet the threshold for a standalone article; therefore it should be proposed for deletion. OrigamiSoft (talk) 16:37, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, India, and Gujarat. Shellwood (talk) 19:10, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:46, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - There are not too many modern news sources, however, Google books show significant coverage in reliable publications such as this. Orientls (talk) 15:10, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have any more examples? This just seems to be kept as an example of successful "woman entreprenuship" due to Modi. There is simply nothing noteworthy about this local business besides it just being an example of the above and discussion regarding it is largely non-existent now. OrigamiSoft (talk) 11:58, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion also comes into play in this. OrigamiSoft (talk) 12:00, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I can see the argument for !Keep in the first deletion discussion, but at this point WP:SUSTAINED would come into play. It received its 10 seconds of fame (even an article in The Wall Street Journal), but very little since that time.--CNMall41 (talk) 19:18, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I am seeing enough coverage from reliable sources. There hasnt been any change since the last AfD. There is nothing called "temporary notability". THEZDRX _{(User) |}_(Contact) 11:40, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An AfD resulting in Keep does not mean that the topic is forever notable per NOTTEMPORARY. You will need to read the entire guideline. WP:SUSTAINED addresses NOTTEMPORARY and says, "Brief bursts of news coverage may not sufficiently demonstrate notability." Brief bursts of news in 2013 is all that we have outside of a few mentions over the last 12 years. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:04, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - We have significant coverage from:

BBC: "Oreo fritters to teacup pizza: Indian street food gets trendy". BBC Home. 2023-12-03.
The Better India: Nitnaware, Himanshu (2021-02-25). "How 2 Homemakers Built Their Own Indigenous Pizza Ovens Won Gujarat". The Better India.
Sharma, Ravindra; Rana, Geeta; Agarwal, Shivani (2022-10-06). Entrepreneurial Innovations, Models, and Implementation Strategies for Industry 4.0. CRC Press. ISBN 978-1-000-64076-2.
Shastri, Durva; Rao, U.T. (2014). "Women Entrepreneurs of Gujarat". Procedia Economics and Finance. 11: 745–752. doi:10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00238-X.
Sharma, Ravindra; Rana, Geeta; Agarwal, Shivani (2022-10-06). Entrepreneurial Innovations, Models, and Implementation Strategies for Industry 4.0. CRC Press. ISBN 978-1-000-64076-2.

All of this coverage comes well after massive coverage in 2013. Subject totally meets WP:GNG. Koshuri ^(あ!) 11:28, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You list one of the books (which is a short section and doesn't meet WP:CORPDEPTH) twice by the way. The BBC is a single mention, The Beter India is unreliable, and the other is about the founder. Which of these exactly meets WP:ORGCRIT? --CNMall41 (talk) 21:04, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Better India is not unreliable. The cited books are also good enough for establishing GNG. At this stage, you are only engaging in nitpicking. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 10:29, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Having a Wikipedia page does not make a source reliable. Even Daily Mail has a Wikipedia page. There is no editorial oversight listed on this publication, the writer of that article has no information in their byline to indicate they are real or what their expertise is, and the terms of use clearly state, The Platform is a content distribution, marketing and advertising platform which allows you to read and view stories, articles, images, etc." I think the TOU disclosure they make says it all. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:41, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, note the information about the BBC reporting it publishes fake news. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:50, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:33, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Garret Cord Werner

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Cited sources are either promotional/unreliable or briefly discuss this obscure interior design firm. Gheus (talk) 10:03, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Companies, Canada, and Washington. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:51, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Same as the other one, coverage seems to mostly fail WP:AUD. I'm not seeing any notability here. Alpha3031 (t • c) 21:25, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am also inclined to push for a deletion on DELREASON 4 on a re-read, even though it doesn't quite meet G11. Alpha3031 (t • c) 07:47, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The article is about an architecture and interior design practice with projects in the United States and Canada. In independent sources the firm is discussed mainly through coverage of specific completed work, including custom houses, multi unit residential projects and renovations of historically significant properties, rather than in general business reporting.

Over a number of years these projects have been written up in independent design and property publications as full project features, not just brief mentions. For this type of practice, coverage of built work is often the main way independent sources address the subject. I have added a couple of additional independent sources to the article to reflect this more clearly.

When I created the article I based my judgement on wiki policy that this kind of firm is less likely to receive sustained general coverage and more likely to be known through notable projects, in the same way that law firms may be covered through significant cases or academics through their h index and peer reviewed work. I still think this is the situation here, and I first learned about the company while reading about a historic renovation project that caught my attention. I also think there are a few good articles about the company that provide significant coverage. I have shared my view and I am happy to leave the final decision to other editors.

[9][10][11] Nullius Inverba 2 (talk) 22:47, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Totally disagree with WP:AUD assessment above as two countries make it more than just regional. There is also a source in Chinese: https://vancouverboulevard.com/2020/03/livable-luxury-%E5%AE%9C%E5%B1%85%E2%80%A2%E5%A5%A2%E8%8F%AF/ Nagirakitan (talk) 12:30, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Acceptable for the niche. I've evaluated a few sources:

Created with templates {{ORGCRIT assess table}} and {{ORGCRIT assess}}
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor.
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Secondary?	Overall value toward ORGCRIT
https://www.generalcontractors.org/the-best-interior-designers-in-seattle-washington			a few paragraphs, but matters
https://www.seattletimes.com/pacific-nw-magazine/seattles-garret-cord-werner-gives-condo-its-own-glow/			about a project
https://www.ft.com/content/bf538d5d-884e-4b3f-ba7d-daacfbe9e916			about a project
https://westernliving.ca/homes-and-design/homes/this-vancouver-home-feels-more-like-a-resort-can-we-check-in-please/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Brosticate (talk) 10:59, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:27, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: per Brosticate Bagwe Neza (talk) 06:08, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What evidence do you have that Western Living and General Contractors Magazine have a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy Bagwe Neza and Brosticate? They look like vanity/content farm websites from the about pages. I'm willing to defer this to a opinion on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard but surely there's something intelligible to say about your position (like what would normally go in the rj= box)? Alpha3031 (t • c) 07:46, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Morpho (lending network)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NCORP fail. All sources are unreliable crypto sources and a google doesn't reveal anything more substantial. Fermiboson (talk) 13:37, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency and Companies. Fermiboson (talk) 13:37, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Zero evidence of WP:NCRYPTO whatsoever. Alpha3031 (t • c) 12:30, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:09, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AEXA

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. There is a decent amount of local news coverage but that's not enough for NCORP. I would have restored the redirect to Agencia Espacial Mexicana, but there doesn't appear to be any mention of anything by that title there. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:47, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:47, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:35, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine, Software, and Spaceflight. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:18, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artificial intelligence-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:24, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: There was, long ago, mention of "AEXA" as a possible acronym for Agencia Espacial Mexicana (hence the redirect), but mention of that was removed in June 2010 (and the agency ended up as "AEM" instead). This probably could have ended up at RfD long ago for that reason, but with the overriding with an article we're here instead. (While this can be construed as a contesting of the old redirect and opposing any restoration of it, at this time I have no opinion on the current article itself.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:31, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, meets GNG, a NASA and The Independent article etc. This technology was used successfully on the ISS, an important space milestone. Randy Kryn (talk) 10:22, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Neither of those sources are independent from the company, the Independent article's content on the company is entirely quotes from the company, and NASA is a business partner. The third point is irrelevant. PARAKANYAA (talk) 15:26, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am so sick and tired of people namedropping WP: GNG without actually checking whether the sources meet it. The NASA piece is not independent coverage of the company; AEXA collaborated with them. The Independent article provides only mentions AEXA once; it is not even close to significant coverage. And who told you that "used successfully on the ISS" is relevant to this discussion? This is a discussion about sourcing. Totally irrelevant rubbish. HyperAccelerated (talk) 20:48, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I could not find sufficient sourcing for the subject to meet WP: GNG in my WP: BEFORE. The existing sources are from entities that closely collaborated with the subject (e.g. NASA) or are trivial mentions (e.g. The Independent, Freethink). HyperAccelerated (talk) 20:44, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:22, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Text generated by a large language model or similar AI technology has been collapsed in line with the relevant guideline and should be excluded from assessments of consensus.

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Adding a brief clarification in response to the concerns raised above regarding independence and significant coverage:

Beyond NASA and partner material, there is non-local, independent, secondary coverage of Aexa’s holoportation technology in both reputable news outlets and scholarly literature. In addition to ScienceAlert, The Independent, and Freethink, the strongest independent source is the peer-reviewed Acta Astronautica article:

Woodland, M. B. (2024). “Applications of extended reality in spaceflight for human space exploration.” Acta Astronautica. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.10.021

This article is written entirely independently of Aexa and NASA, and it discusses holoportation and Aexa’s system within the broader scientific context of extended-reality technologies in human spaceflight. It is non-routine, non-local, and meets Wikipedia’s definition of significant secondary coverage. Peer-reviewed academic sources are explicitly acceptable under WP and satisfy the requirements of WP when they provide in-depth, analytical treatment of the subject—which this one does.

Taken together, the Acta Astronautica coverage and multiple independent news articles provide substantial evidence of notability under GNG. I agree that the article needs cleanup for tone and reduced reliance on primary material, and I am prepared to help with that. But the sourcing meets the policy threshold for retention. Fdodelap76 (talk) 19:37, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stop using AI. Copying my comment from below:

That article doesn't even mention them, at all. It is also titled differently and in a different journal by different authors than that DOI. And the one you wanted to link doesn't mention them either! Are you using AI? Because I find it difficult to find a human making that mistake. Egregious source misrepresentation. PARAKANYAA (talk) 19:38, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @PARAKANYAAI'm not using AI; I'm not as familiar as you are to the Wikipedia system.

Here is the first one: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772569323001032?via%3Dihub

I can add the abstract if needed.

Here is the second one: https://telehealthandmedicinetoday.com/index.php/journal/article/view/452

Thank you so much for your support @PARAKANYAA I'll be here in case I need to provide more information.

Have a blessed day! Fdodelap76 (talk) 21:19, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Fdodelap76 Then how did you manage to link one study that does not mention it, while describing it as another study, that also does not mention it?

I can read the article in full. It does not mention Aexa. The second one does not have a single sentence about Aexa. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:22, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@PARAKANYAAthe article about telehealth, if you go to the section Holographic Teleportation in Space, after Quantum Communications says: Holographic teleportation is a type of capture that allows high-quality 3D models of people to be reconstructed, compressed, and transmitted live anywhere in realtime.4In October 2021, NASA flight surgeon Dr. Josef Schmid, industry partner Aexa Aerospace CEO Dr. Fernando De La Peña Llaca, and their teams were the first humans holographically teleported from Earth into space.

Let's work on thus together, I'm here my friend if I need to help you with something else, as I really value your time. Fdodelap76 (talk) 21:27, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is not an article about holographical technology. It is an article about AEXA. AEXA does not inherit the notability of technology they work on, unless that sourcing is about AEXA. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:33, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification, and I appreciate your patience. You are correct that the two sources I linked do not mention Aexa directly, my fault.

I will look again for sources that discuss Aexa itself in independent depth, and if none exist, I’m happy to help improve or adjust the article in line with policy. Thank you for guiding me through the process. Fdodelap76 (talk) 21:54, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @PARAKANYAAhere are new independent sources that directly cover Aexa as a company your valuable consideration:

• **Houston Chronicle** – “There but not there: Aexa wants you to virtually teleport anywhere”

A full-length newspaper profile discussing Aexa’s origins, leadership, business development, and work with holographic communication systems. This is a major, reliable news outlet and provides non-trivial company-focused coverage.

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/business/texas-inc/article/There-but-not-there-Aexa-wants-you-to-15574933.php

• **KHOU 11 News** – “Houston company using holographic technology on the International Space Station”

Independent reporting from a local TV news station specifically about Aexa’s work, including interviews, context, and explanation of the company’s role.

https://www.khou.com/article/tech/science/houston-company-using-holographic-technology-international-space-station/285-0b67bb3d-1482-43c1-a268-36764bdd1f02

• **StrikeWerx (Air Force Global Strike Command innovation hub)** – reporting on Aexa Aerospace delivering new B-52 equipment for GSC

Provides independent industry-sector coverage of Aexa’s defense work, written by an external organization and not by the company itself.

https://www.strikewerx.com/aexa-aerospace-strikewerx-deliver-new-b-52-equipment-to-global-strike-command

• **BuiltIn** – List of Houston defense companies including Aexa

Independent tech-industry publication noting Aexa’s role in the region’s defense technology ecosystem.

https://builtin.com/articles/defense-companies-houston

Please let me know if this is good enough.

Thanks again for your time. Fdodelap76 (talk) 22:02, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are using AI. Stop.

I addressed this before, the first two are local news, which per WP:NCORP does not count much.The next one is not independent as it is from a company that works with AEXA, and the fourth says written by AI, which makes it not reliable. Arguing with AI gets one nowhere. PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:07, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The third one STRIKEWERX is not a company, STRIKEWERX is an innovation arm of the AFGSC Office of the Chief Scientist.

STRIKEWERX is part of the Air Force Global Strike Command, here is the link:

https://www.strikewerx.com/who-we-are Fdodelap76 (talk) 22:10, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@PARAKANYAAhopefully my answer to STRIKEWERX helps.

Again thank you so much for your time. I found the following taht mentions Aexa in the contect and I'm not using AI.

https://www.sciencealert.com/nasa-surgeon-beamed-to-international-space-station-in-holoportation-world-first

https://www.space.com/hologram-doctor-space-station-nasa-astronauts

https://www.phoenix.edu/press-release/university-of-phoenix-alum-dr--de-la-pena-llaca-s-holoportation-.html

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2022/04/19/nasa-doctor-holoports-space-station-telemedicine/7366934001/

Per your prior comments, these sources are indpependent, not promotional, and provide non-trivial company mentions and are not local.

Looking forward for your very valuable feedback Fdodelap76 (talk) 22:51, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

per WP:GNG/WP:NCORP: Multiple independent national sources...

Space.com analyzes AEXA's role: https://www.space.com/hologram-doctor-space-station-nasa-astronauts - "NASA...partner Aexa Aerospace" with context on innovation

USA Today covers company achievement:: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2022/04/19/nasa-doctor-holoports-space-station-telemedicine/7366934001/ USA Today

https://www.sciencealert.com/nasa-surgeon-beamed-to-international-space-station-in-holoportation-world-first Science Alert

https://www.phoenix.edu/press-release/university-of-phoenix-alum-dr--de-la-pena-llaca-s-holoportation-.html Phoenix University

These are non-local, beyond primaries/press releases per Wiki policy. Fdodelap76 (talk) 03:17, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Again, all these sources have the same problem, they are all non-independent, passing mentions, or press releases. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:20, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What's about Strikerwex? that one is the Air Force Global Strike Command. Is that considered as well non-independent @PARAKANYAA? Thank you for your guidance Fdodelap76 (talk) 17:22, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's about a company that works with them writing about how they worked together, so non-independent. 'Aerospace, a company that provides solutions for training and operational support, has collaborated with STRIKEWERX, the innovation partner AFGSC and a division of the Cyber Innovation Center (CIC), to create new capabilities and increase efficiency for the Electronic Warfare Pressurizing Test Set (EWPTS).' PARAKANYAA (talk) 17:34, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @PARAKANYAA for clarifying, I'm learning as we speak.

I understand your point about STRIKEWERX, since the article describes a collaboration with Aexa, it does not count as independent secondary coverage.

You are absolutely right, and I won’t rely on it for establishing notability.

At this point I’m focusing only on the fully independent sources (Houston Chronicle, Space.com, ScienceAlert, USA Today) that provide non-trivial coverage and mention Aexa’s role in the ISS holoportation milestone. Fdodelap76 (talk) 18:46, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Noting the above {{cait}} has replies from PARAKANYAA but since the comments from Fdodelap76 are all generated, collapsing the whole thread. Alpha3031 (t • c) 08:35, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Text generated by a large language model or similar AI technology has been collapsed in line with the relevant guideline and should be excluded from assessments of consensus.

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Keep - The article covers a notable, independently reported event, the 2021 holoportation on the ISS, which has been reported by NASA, and some news websites. This shows there is some significant coverage beyond routine press releases. However, the current version feels promotional and relies too much on company or partner sources. I suggest keeping the article but rewriting it in a neutral tone and replacing company-sourced material with independent coverage. SanneMonte (talk) 16:18, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Responses are left uncollapsed on this one since they're fairly minimal. Alpha3031 (t • c) 08:35, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- The sources don't evidence that. We don't have any non-local sigcov. NASA is not independent. PARAKANYAA (talk) 17:34, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  - SanneMonte, you need to be more specific and on-topic if an admin is going to accept your opinion on this. You say "replace with independent coverage"--well, unless you can show that such coverage exists, what's there to do? And if you don't have that coverage, how can you argue the topic itself, the company, is notable? Drmies (talk) 22:10, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    - I just wanted to note that it's not actually necessary to reply to or call out LLM generated comments. One can simply {{cait}}/{{caib}} if they're obviously nonsensical. Alpha3031 (t • c) 08:35, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
!strong keep per WP:GNG/NCORP: Space.com provides independent, non-trivial coverage of AEXA's custom software enabling first Earth-to-ISS holoportation: "NASA flight surgeon...and Aexa Aerospace CEO...used custom Aexa software" [12](https://www.space.com/hologram-doctor-space-station-nasa-astronauts). USA Today similarly details company role https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2022/04/19/nasa-doctor-holoports-space-station-telemedicine/7366934001/. Beyond routine/local. Article needs neutral rewrite post-AfD. Fdodelap76 (talk) 03:39, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Not sigcov. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:44, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
While some coverage is local to Texas, there are also national and international sources discussing Aexa’s holoportation work on the ISS and its mixed-reality systems in non-trivial depth. For example, [13], [14], [15], [16], [17] provide independent discussion of Aexa’s role, context, and technology rather than merely passing mentions. Taken together, these appear to satisfy WP:GNG and therefore NCORP. ~2025-39122-26 (talk) 19:02, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Source 1 is a press release, source 2 is a press release by a university about one of their students, source 3 is a press release, source 4 is their own website, source 5 is WP:DEPRECATED as per WP:CRUNCHBASE. None of these sources help whatsoever. PARAKANYAA (talk) 19:12, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In addition to the independent news coverage already cited (ScienceAlert, The Independent, Freethink), Aexa’s holoportation work is also discussed in a peer-reviewed scientific article published in Acta Astronautica:

Woodland, M. B. (2024). “Applications of extended reality in spaceflight for human space exploration.” Acta Astronautica. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.10.021

This is a high-quality, independent, secondary academic source that analyzes extended-reality technologies in human spaceflight and includes Aexa’s holoportation system as a case example. Academic publications like this are considered strong evidence of notability under WP and WP, since they provide non-trivial, non-local, non-routine coverage of the subject in a broader scientific context.

Taken together, the peer-reviewed coverage and multiple independent news articles demonstrate that Aexa receives significant coverage in reliable sources, meeting GNG and supporting retention of the article with cleanup for tone where appropriate. ~2025-39122-26 (talk) 19:30, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That article doesn't even mention them, at all. It is also titled differently and in a different journal by different authors than that DOI. And the one you wanted to link doesn't mention them either! Are you using AI? Because I find it difficult to find a human making that mistake. Egregious source misrepresentation.

And the other sources you mention don't exist! PARAKANYAA (talk) 19:35, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voltio (carsharing company)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. None of the sources in the article meet the criteria. I ask if people disagree, please point to specific content (e.g. the paragraph starting with the word ...) or pages where you believe there is in-depth indepdent *content* about the *company*. HighKing⁺⁺ 09:21, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Companies. HighKing⁺⁺ 09:21, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Here's how the sourcing stacks up:

Blogs are not reliable sources

Mutua.es is a blog. They are not considered reliable sources. Fails WP:RS.

Profiles or announcements on partner websites

Free now profile
This is a profile on an insurance company.

Next we have a bunch of articles covering the initial announcement, all saying the same thing around the same week or so. It is PR and regurgitates company-provided information. None of these sources include any kind of "independent content" by way of in-depth opinion or analysis and they fail WP:ORGIND and/or WP:CORPDEPTH. (Did we really need all these sources in the article or is this an example of ref bloat?) I include the following in this selection:

Then we have various "expansion" or "discount code" announcements

Larazon mentioning the growth numbers reported by Mutua and a description of the service, but no independent content.
From the Press Room
Marketing Direction providing discount codes along with a standard PR profile
Press Release appearing in Europa Press website
Car and Driver reprinting an expansion announcement PR
El Periódico reprint of the "expansion to madrid airport" announcement PR
City Hall of Boadilla del Monte announcing availability of the service in their town after the mayor made a request. This is PR.
Referity website which probably fails WP:RS and is listing promotional codes.
Madrid Diario website carrying the PR "expansion to madrid" PR with discount "welcome promotion"
Motor 16 regurgitating the company reported numbers
Madrid Diario PR of "Voltio Plus" app
ABC Spain announcement of Voltio Plus subscription service - PR
El Mundo announcement of Voltio Home service - PR
Madrid Diario announcement of expansion to other airports - PR
Madrid Diario announcement of Volio Rent - PR, also covered by this on the company website.

While there is a lot of mentions in some notable pubications, none contain sufficient in-depth independent content. HighKing⁺⁺ 10:28, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Mutua Madrileña. I think there is enough useful information to add a brief mention on the parent company's article, in which case we can redirect there. Alpha3031 (t • c) 22:28, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have no issue with a redirect either. HighKing⁺⁺ 17:03, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete appears to be WP:PROMO Agnieszka653 (talk) 18:00, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It is not PROMO. I have no profesional relationship with this company. Earth605^talk 13:29, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 16:36, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Spain. Shellwood (talk) 16:43, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gold Mind Records

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced. Fails WP:ORG.4meter4 (talk) 02:04, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Organizations. 4meter4 (talk) 02:04, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 09:05, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This is an obvious merge target that did not need to come to AfD. It could be integrated into Norman Harris (musician) or Salsoul Records; I'd probably suggest the latter as the better resting place. Chubbles (talk) 15:03, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 07:36, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GAE (company)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. No evidence of any notability for this company. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:35, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Companies, and Japan. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:35, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to My World, My Way (video game). Most notable product. Go D. Usopp (talk) 06:57, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 07:39, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CaptionHub

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

failing WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Shah Of Nowhere ^talk! 01:47, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Software, and United Kingdom. Shah Of Nowhere ^talk! 01:47, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 09:06, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - obvious case of WP:PROMO. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 17:45, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:53, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MediaPost

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional, no significant coverage from reliable sources to verify the claims. Fails WP:GNG, no independent sources found. Pasados (talk) 19:08, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. You probably could've just CSD A7'd this one. Athanelar (talk) 19:39, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Athanelar: WP:GNG is a higher standard than WP:A7 and is met. The cited sources also indicate WP:SIGNIFICANCE, e.g. the company's conferences are well-attended (Turow 2014) and it is one of several important sources for marketing intelligence (DeGaris 2015). —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 16:37, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising, Companies, and New York. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:19, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:41, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Easily meets WP:GNG via coverage in several academic reference books, including at least one university-level textbook published by Routledge.^[1]^[2]^[3] One academic reference work mentions MediaPost alongside notable publications AdAge and Brandweek as an important source for marketing intelligence.^[4] Coverage is generally brief, but is more than a trivial mention as required per WP:SIGCOV. Just because the subject is part of the advertising industry doesn't mean the article itself is promotional. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 05:40, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the sources are not sufficiently reliable or substantial, they just mentions few details about MediaPost as advertising. subject still does not meet the notability criteria for magazines, if you have more better sources, please include them. Pasados (talk) 16:02, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Both Routledge and ABC-Clio are mainstream academic publishers, and Turow (2014) is a recognized expert on new media and marketing. All four sources meet WP:ORGCRIT in that they are reliable, secondary sources that are independent of and contain significant coverage of the topic. What is your evidence that they are not reliable? —Sangdeboeuf (talk) —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 16:21, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Sangdeboeuf. ~~There is also a book with a chapter titled The Skills of Middle Managers in a Strategic Context of Corporate Social Responsibility: the MEDIAPOST Case-Study~~. Kelob2678 (talk) 00:20, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I came across that chapter while adding to this article, and it's actually about the French advertising mail distributor Mediapost, not the American magazine publisher MediaPost. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 07:35, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You are correct. Then maybe this coverage of the trademark dispute with the Interactive Advertising Bureau is good enough for notability.
McCall, M. (2005). IAB accuses MediaPost of misusing mark. Tradeshow Week, 35(9), 1-1,26. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/trade-journals/iab-accuses-mediapost-misusing-mark/docview/236995702/se-2

IAB and MediaPost settle lawsuit over trademark use. (2005). Tradeshow Week, 35(18), 4. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/trade-journals/iab-mediapost-settle-lawsuit-over-trademark-use/docview/236989867/se-2
Kelob2678 (talk) 12:02, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheInevitables (talk) 01:43, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Turow, Joseph (2014). "The Magazine Industry". Media Today: Mass Communication in a Converging World (5th ed.). New York: Routledge. pp. 252, 254. doi:10.4324/9780203111581-24. ISBN 978-1-136-27897-6 – via Google Books. MediaPost, a trade publisher for marketing and media practitioners, uses this [digital-focused] model. Go to MediaPost.com, and you can subscribe to its monthly print magazines, OMMA magazine and MEDIA magazine. You can also read the magazines' articles for free online, and you can read a huge number of other articles that stay digital. The digital and the printed versions are all supported by advertising. The company also makes money by mounting well-attended conferences for digital media and digital marketing practitioners. MediaPost charges hefty entry fees for the conferences and also gets support from firms that want to advertise to the attendees. [...] Earlier we discussed MediaPost as a trade magazine publisher. If you go to Mediapost.com, you will see that the company also describes itself as 'an integrated publishing and content company whose mission is to provide a complete array of resources for media, marketing and advertising professionals.' Among those resources is a 'portfolio of daily and weekly email newsletters.' There are over 50 of them, and they provide news in the categories of online media (e.g., Online Media Daily), traditional media (MediaDailyNews), and marketing (Marketing Daily).
^ Burns, Kelli S. (2017). Social Media: A Reference Handbook (1st ed.). Santa Barbara, Calif.: ABC-Clio. pp. 345–346. ISBN 979-8-216-14629-2 – via Internet Archive. MediaPost is a publishing and content company that offers resources to media, marketing, and advertising professionals. Besides conferences and events, MediaPost also publishes Mediapost.com, described as the 'largest and most influential media, marketing and advertising site on the net.' MediaPost's content is divided into publications that users can read online or have regularly delivered to their e-mail. Social Media & Marketing Daily, Video Daily, and Mobile Marketing Daily are three MediaPost publications that cover the social media industry.
^ Oppenheim, Michael R.; Mulcahy, Wendy Diamond (2013). "Advertising and Media Planning Sources". Marketing Information: A Strategic Guide for Business and Finance Libraries (1st ed.). New York: Routledge. p. 168. doi:10.4324/9780203862469. ISBN 978-1-135-18558-9 – via Google Books. MediaPost (http://www.mediapost.com) is a subscription Web site that offers a directory of 60,000 media contacts covering radio, TV, cable, Internet, magazines, newspapers and agencies. As a 'portal' serving media buyers and planners, it offers other resources such as 'rate and data' services, research, ratings, productivity tools, and industry news.
^ DeGaris, Larry (2015). "A practical approach to sports marketing". Sports Marketing: A Practical Approach (1st ed.). London: Routledge. pp. 16–17. doi:10.4324/9780203097618. ISBN 978-1-136-22346-4 – via Google Books. A brief roster of important sources for marketing intelligence in sports marketing includes: [...] AdAge, Brandweek, MediaPost. Advertising, marketing, and media trade publications for insight into marketing in general.

Explurger

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Much time having been wasted over this whole affair, I won't bore you by repeating the details. Sources are press release after press release of the most SERIESA/WP:CORPROUTINE content you'll find.

Extended content

Created with templates {{ORGCRIT assess table}} and {{ORGCRIT assess}}
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor.
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?
"Social media travel app 'Explurger' with AI-based features launched, here's what it does". HT Tech. 2020-08-15. Retrieved 2025-10-08.		–	WP:CORPROUTINE launch, minimal analysis.
"Actor Sonu Sood Wants To 'Make People Addicted In A Good Way' With His Social Media App Explurger". Outlook Business. 2022-06-10. Retrieved 2025-10-08.	Content is interview answers
"Explurger secures $4.5 million in Series-A funding led by Affle". The Times of India. 2024-02-15. ISSN 0971-8257. Retrieved 2025-10-08.			RSNOI applies, this is fairly routine churn of funding round press materials
Release, ANI Press (2022-07-15). "Sonu Sood's fans invite 11 crore people on Explurger". Archived from the original on 16 October 2022. Retrieved 2025-10-08.	This is, at least, clearly marked, as shown by the author
Team, DNA Web. "Sonu Sood launches his new social media app, Explurger: Know its key features". DNA India. Retrieved 2025-10-10.			Again, very minimal content beyond the launch announcement
"Building Better: Founders, Futures, and the Power of Vision". ET Now. 4 August 2025. Retrieved 2025-10-09.		Listicle from Bizz Impact, no evidence of reputation (No ET Now Journalists are involved in creation of this article)
Roy, Kumar Shankar (2021-12-08). "Social media app Explurger raises $1 million funding". BusinessLine. Retrieved 2025-10-08.			Quotes from funding announcement again
"Explurger raises $4.5 million in funding round led by Affle". The Economic Times. 2024-02-14. ISSN 0013-0389. Retrieved 2025-10-08.			Honestly, you see the funding round article once, you see them all.
"Explurger Answers PM Modi's Call for Homegrown Innovation in Social Media". The Wire. Retrieved 2025-10-08.	No idea what the letters "P" and "R" here could stand for. Totally. None at all.
Rest of it is also pretty much press release, press release, press release. At least some of them, like Tribune, are marked.

Alpha3031 (t • c) 09:43, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, Software, and India. Alpha3031 (t • c) 09:43, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related deletion discussions. Wikishovel (talk) 10:00, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Travel and tourism-related deletion discussions. Wikishovel (talk) 10:00, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete : I was leaning towards "weak keep" as the sourcing was only slightly unsatisfactory, but upon examining the collapsed content, I agree with the proposer than the sources of this article are not of an acceptable quality. Kvinnen • dispatch an owl 11:33, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I don’t really see a valid reason to delete, because the subject meets WP:GNG, and it is a service not a company so we can apply WP:NORG but only through WP:PRODUCT, and for software programs, GNG is the relevant notability criteria; also there are enough reliable sources covering this topic in details, including 1, 2, 3 and more, but the article has promotional content that needs cleanup. Pasados (talk) 16:51, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That's very interesting. Do you have time to talk about it now? Alpha3031 (t • c) 21:11, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am seriously asking this question, and I do not retract it. I would consider it good form to explain why you think two funding announcements and a launch announcement are anything but routine coverage, which is covered under both Wikipedia:Notability § Common circumstances and the subject specific listing of such circumstances, WP:CORPROUTINE. I will revise my assessment given an appropriate answer, but I do need an answer from you. Alpha3031 (t • c) 22:20, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Remember that not all third-party sources are reliable. It's very common for companies at this stage to make press releases and funding announcements. In many cases, these announcements are made via PR firms that they contract. These sources are not independent and cannot count towards notability. Please be more careful going forward. HyperAccelerated (talk) 20:58, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – The CEO of the company doesn't seem particularly noteworthy on his own, but the company appears to have enough to WP:NCORP. Svartner (talk) 21:47, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You have provided no justification for why we should listen to you. HyperAccelerated (talk) 20:59, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I did a WP: BEFORE and could only find routine coverage. You know it's bad when the top Keep !vote claims that they found quality sources that will save the article, and they all fall into WP: CORPROUTINE. HyperAccelerated (talk) 20:56, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:23, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Like Kvinnen above, I was leaning toward a week "keep", until I checked the source analysis. A WP:BEFORE search only turned up more of the same WP:NEWSORGINDIA puff pieces about how it's "putting India on the map", interviews, etc. It's a startup, and best of luck to them. Wikishovel (talk) 05:31, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Seraph Public Relations and Media

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Sources are featured or sponsored posts failing WP:RS. Ednabrenze (talk) 04:41, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Companies, and Nigeria. Ednabrenze (talk) 04:41, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails WP:ORGDEPTH, the sources all point to one initiative, and the coverage appears minimal at best, regardless of source reliability. ~RAM (talk) 04:27, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The company seems reputable. The sources are diverse and cover different aspects of the company. Young Dammy (talk) 15:51, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:50, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Sources are all reprinting of their press releases. WP:NEWSORGNIGERIA comes to mind. 🄻 🄰 14:24, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
All sources? This is quite debatable. I suggest you take a look at the sources and the company's press release again. Young Dammy (talk) 17:48, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Táilte Tours

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organization. Overwhelmingly sourced to the company's own website, and the few sources not directly affiliated are merely passing or incidental coverage. There's a few sentences at most in each source that discuss the organization itself. I have not been able to locate any better coverage of this organization. This article clearly fails WP:NCORP. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:13, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Ireland. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:13, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Travel and tourism. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:54, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Or, failing that and at an absolute stretch, redirect to Railtour#Railtour operators in Ireland. Per nom, this small company (formed in 2024 and with perhaps <20 (<10?) employees) doesn't meet WP:NCORP. The only reason this title seems to exist is because of the space (heritage rail transport?) in which the organisation operates. And orgs do not "inherit" notability from other topics/entities/people and are not "inherently" notable just for existing or operating in a specific space. No independent notability is demonstrated here. Guliolopez (talk) 12:59, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Railtour#Railtour operators in Ireland per ATD. There is some coverage in mainstream reporting such as [18], [19] but not enough to get us over the notability threshold for non-profit organizations. Given that there is some reliable press I do think a redirect would be fine.4meter4 (talk) 16:29, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Further thoughts on redirecting?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:08, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alecto AI

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While the founder of the organization, Breeze Liu, may be notable, the organization does not seem to be notable itself. Per consideration of the current article's sources and a WP:BEFORE, the organization is only mentioned in passing in relation to the founder's activism, but there is no in-depth coverage of the organization itself. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 00:06, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Companies, Artificial intelligence, United States of America, and California. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 00:06, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not convinced on founder notability, but I guess I'm not fully convinced they're not notable either. Either way, this can be a redirect to Breeze Liu until someone nominates the article on her also. Alpha3031 (t • c) 09:30, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:10, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thunderobot

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Created with no credible claim of significance or passing of WP:NCORP. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:04, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Companies, and Computing. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:04, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: the only source I could find that (as far as I could tell) comes from a reliable source is this [20] from TechRadar. That's not SIGCOV of the company itself, so I have doubts over notability. Gommeh 📖 🎮 16:19, 25 November 2025 (UTC) Now I'm 50/50 on whether those sources are good enough to satisfy WP:NORG. Gommeh 📖 🎮 21:35, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:NGAME. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 19:39, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NGAME doesn't apply here. This article covers a company, not a video game. Bailmoney27 ^talk 00:57, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
1. Chan, Hing Kai; Liu, Martin J.; Wang, Jie; Zhang, Tiantian (2022). "The Thunderobot Technologies Crowdfunding Case: Equity-Based". Responsible Innovation Management. Singapore: Springer Nature. pp. 27–31. ISBN 978-981-19-4479-6. ISSN 2731-4162. Retrieved 2025-11-27 – via Google Books.
  The book notes: "Thunderobot Technologies is a reputable Chinese company that specializes in esports ardware and software. Popular apparatus and instruments provided by Thunder-obot include esports notebooks, esports desktops, and other esports peripherals. The mission of the company is to "Allow every player to have an extreme game experi-ence." In 2014, Thunderobot Technology secured its A round funding of 5 million ... As a result, Thunderobot has attracted 4 Dongjia investors with a total investment of 4.715 million RMB (accounting for 3.13% of the total shares) and ten little Dongjia investors with a total investment of 285,000 RMB (accounting for 0.19% of the total shares). After this equity-based crowdfunding financing, Thunderobot Technology successfully raised 15 million RMB and the company's value has increased from 135 million RMB to 150 million RMB. The success of this equity-based crowdfunding put Thunderobot Technology in a more competitive and advantageous position in the esports industry."
2. Wang, Fengbin; Zhang, Chi (2021). Thunderobot Strives to Build a Multi-Win Ecosystem. Renmin University. doi:10.4135/9781529763980. ISBN 978-1-5297-6398-0.
  The abstract notes: "Thunderobot, an SME specializing in gaming laptops, incubated in the Intelligent Interconnection Platform of Haier Group in 2014, has ranked no. 1 in the domestic market and in the top 5 in the world. Listed on National Equities Exchange and Quotations of China in September 2017, Thunderobot has been the first listed company in the game industry. Focusing in designing and marketing for gaming laptops and computer and peripheral devices, Thunderobot began its ecological layout just less than one year after its establishment. From hardware to software and then cultural creative industry, Thunderobot’s landscape is expanding. Now, Thunderobot does not fight on its own; six subsidiaries have been emerging gradually, making the Thunderobot fleet stronger. Until October 2017, Thunderobot’s ecological revenue has reached RMB 180,000,000 per month, taking 15–20% of the total. Thunderobot begins to harvest from its ecosystem. But some questions remain to be answered: How to maintain a virtuous cycle of the whole ecosystem? How can the ecosystem survive forever?"
3. Liao, Ganli; Li, Lele; Zhao, Qitong; Li, Yi (2025). "Exploring multiple pathways to high entrepreneurial performance in digit-oriented spin-offs: based on optimal distinctiveness theory". Chinese Management Studies. doi:10.1108/CMS-10-2024-0751.
  The article notes: "Qingdao Thunderobot Technology Co., Ltd. (Thunderobot) serves as a typical case for this configuration. As a high-performance specialized computer hardware equipment provider, Thunderobot’s products are primarily used in scenarios such as e-sports, video creation, creative design and digital office environments. Thunderobot has rapidly established its own supply chain and sales channels by deeply embedding itself within the parent network and leveraging the resources and strengths of its parent company, Haier Group. For instance, Haier’s cooperation with world-class computer original design manufacturers, such as Quanta and BlueSky, has enabled Thunderobot, as a small-scale startup, to establish direct collaborative links with these major manufacturers through Haier’s network. Simultaneously, relying on Haier’s strong resource endorsement, Thunderobot has efficiently developed independent networks by leveraging the paths provided by venture capital firms such as Zihui Ventures and SAIF Partners. It has established stable alliance relationships with companies like Tongfang Information and Compal Electronics and has built a professional gaming platform called “Shenyou Network,” thereby constructing an independent value network centered on itself. Additionally, Thunderobot has adopted exploratory strategies, continuously innovating its products and upgrading its technologies. By delving into the gaming laptop market and building an e-sports ecosystem, the company has achieved sustained business growth and high entrepreneurial performance."
4. Li, Zhigang 李志刚; Xu, Chenhe 许晨鹤; Yue, Guolin 乐国林 (2016). "基于扎根理论方法的孵化型裂变创业探索性研究——以海尔集团孵化雷神公司为例" [An Exploratory Study about Incubating Spin-off Entrepreneurship Based on Grounded Theory——A Case about Thunderobot Company Incubated from Haier Group]. 管理学报 [Journal of Management] (in Chinese). Vol. 13, no. 7. pp. 972–979. Retrieved 2025-11-27 – via CQVIP.
  The abstract notes: "基于理论抽样,以海尔集团孵化雷神公司为典型案例,运用扎根理论方法进行探索性挖掘,提炼出母体企业孵化、研发团队组建、商业模式形成、裂变动机产生和新创企业生成5个主范畴,在此基础上构建出涵盖以上5个要素的孵化型裂变创业理论模型,并从母体企业作用、新创业务影响、创业驱动因素等方面进一步识别了孵化型裂变创业的主要特征。"
  From Google Translate: "Based on theoretical sampling, taking Haier Group's incubation of Thunderobot as a typical case, this study uses grounded theory to conduct exploratory research and extracts five main categories: parent company incubation, R&D team building, business model formation, fission motivation generation, and new enterprise generation. On this basis, an incubation-based fission entrepreneurship theoretical model covering the above five elements is constructed. Furthermore, the main characteristics of incubation-based fission entrepreneurship are identified from aspects such as the role of the parent company, the impact of new businesses, and entrepreneurial driving factors."
5. Lin, Nianxiu 林念修 (2019). 全国双创示范基地创新创业百佳案例 [Top 100 Innovation and Entrepreneurship Cases in National Mass Entrepreneurship and Innovation Demonstration Bases] (in Chinese). Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press. ISBN 978-7-5201-4932-7. Retrieved 2025-11-27 – via Google Books.
  The book notes: "“雷神”是海尔内部孵化的典型代表，在海尔工作的三个“80后”发现游戏本领域的用户痛点并创业成立雷神公司，海尔双创平台对雷神公司提供了全流程全方位的投资孵化以及相关配套服务。该公司只用了半年时间产出第一款产品，创业第二年销售额就超过2亿元，创业第三年成功挂牌新三板，创造了“雷神”速度。二是脱离母体孵化模式。"
  From Google Translate: ""Thunderobot" is a typical example of a company incubated within Haier. Three post-80s employees working at Haier identified user pain points in the gaming sector and founded Thunderobot. Haier's innovation and entrepreneurship platform provided Thunderobot with comprehensive investment incubation and related support services throughout the entire process. The company produced its first product in just six months, achieved sales exceeding 200 million yuan in its second year, and successfully listed on the New Third Board in its third year, creating the "Thunderobot speed." Secondly, it broke away from the parent company's incubation model."
There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Thunderobot (Chinese: 雷神公司) to pass Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Primary criteria, which requires "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject".
Cunard (talk) 09:04, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree that these academic sources are sufficient for NCORP. But they show a relation to Haier, which may be worth mentioning somewhere. IgelRM (talk) 17:38, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 14:57, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Gommeh. Go D. Usopp (talk) 22:38, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – The sources presented above by Cunard pass WP:ORGCRIT/WP:SIRS. (Chan et al., 2022) provides five pages of coverage on Thunderobot. (Wang & Zhang, 2021) is a book entirely dedicated to Thunderobot. Additionally, (Liao et al., 2025), (Li, Zu & Yue, 2016), and (Lin, 2019) all provide significant coverage of Thunderobot. This clearly passes WP:GNG/WP:NORG. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 15:54, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Aviationwikiflight. Bailmoney27 ^talk 20:09, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or keep?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:31, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Microcabin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH with sources amounting to minor announcements. Japanese article not any better. There are some sources found on the talk page but all from a single publication and don't seem particularly significant. This "cabin" may need to be boarded up. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 04:46, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Companies, and Japan. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 04:46, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Xak or AQ Interactive. The latter might be better for being a plausible subtopic redirect. Go D. Usopp (talk) 01:46, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I should also note that the article may have to be moved to Microcabin (company) if redirected, because they seem to be an actual form of cabin and should probably redirect to Tiny-house movement. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:29, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to AQ Interactive. Plausible search term, as a subsidiary company of the target. Sergecross73 msg me 03:40, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 20:42, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Xak would be more prudent ATD for now. checking into AQ Interactive#Subsidiaries shows that Micro cabin is a former subsidiary of it and has become a consolidated subsidiary of Fields Corporation, which we have yet an article of, in the english wiki at least.Lorraine Crane (talk) 04:33, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I still think a mention as a "previous subsidiary" gives more insight than its listing at a single game. There's virtually nothing beyond a name drop at Xak. I'd rather build more at AQ. Sergecross73 msg me 18:12, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:35, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Racjin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Almost entirely unsourced since 2007 and significant coverage is zilch. Couldn't find anything in gaming magazines beyond a mention of the studio name. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 04:38, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Companies, and Japan. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 04:38, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Snowboard Kids, most notable product. Deletion is also preferable as long as its former name still redirects towards the suggested target. Go D. Usopp (talk) 01:51, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More support for redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 06:56, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as proposed as an ATD, sure. Can't even find much in Japanese, though my skills in that language are rather limited. LightlySeared (talk) 09:59, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I disagree with the proposed redirection target as the developer has developed many games and is still actively developing; redirecting to an arbitrary could cause confusion. Jumpytoo Talk 04:27, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Concurring, "most notable" is not a reasoning. IgelRM (talk) 17:41, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:27, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of turkey meat producing companies in the United States

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability or reception at all (WP:NLIST). A decent amount of these (not 100% sure about all of them) are WP:PROMO. Gommeh 📖 🎮 16:07, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and United States of America. Gommeh 📖 🎮 16:07, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Lists. Gommeh 📖 🎮 16:08, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Passes WP:NLIST. Google books has entire books devoted to turkey production in the United States. Clearly discussed in-depth in multiple reliable sources. A WP:BEFORE clearly was not done.4meter4 (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Creator User:Mckburton is a sock account. Much of this is WP:NOTPLOT. — Maile (talk) 18:08, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What does WP:NOTPLOT have to do with a list of companies? That policy applies to articles on books, films, television shows, etc. Totally not relevant to this page. And many editors have contributed to this article in the ten years since Mckburton created the article, so that isn't relevant either. This isn't a valid deletion argument.4meter4 (talk) 20:47, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, that isn't a valid deletion rationale. Gommeh 📖 🎮 20:57, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's a nefarious plot concocted by the turkey companies. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:27, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:NLIST. I trimmed the list, keeping only companies that have a standalone page. This should deal with WP:PROMO concerns. Kelob2678 (talk) 12:20, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Would it be reasonable to add a reception section then, or something that discusses the list as a group? Gommeh 📖 🎮 20:58, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This would be great, but I am not willing to do it[21]. Kelob2678 (talk) 22:00, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:15, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, makers by commodity are always grouped and reported in places, especially if the commodity's a popular one. Hyperbolick (talk) 09:30, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this turkey. The major (articled) producers can be mentioned in Poultry farming. Where are these alleged company lists by commodity? Not in Category:Lists of companies of the United States by industry (industry, not commodity). Where are the chicken lists, the pork lists, etc.? Clarityfiend (talk) 10:25, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 14:08, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Clarityfiend unless someone can explain why this is not in the territory of list of shades of colors of apple sauce. Tioaeu8943 (talk) 15:51, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:NLIST. I'm only seeing one source ([22]) that discusses the list as a group. I can't see anything to justify keeping this as a standalone list.--DesiMoore (talk) 16:23, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NLIST is satisfied. I already linked one source above, there are more[23][24][25][26] on top of the one you provided. Kelob2678 (talk) 17:31, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Net-Zero Asset Owner Alliance

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources are all primary, or press releases. A Google search turns up nothing better. Just a big list of companies who happened to sign some agreement; many of the listed companies are not notable themselves. MediaKyle (talk) 18:31, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Companies. MediaKyle (talk) 18:31, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Business, and Environment. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:34, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Sources presented on the article, the subject seems notable.RolandSimon (talk) 16:34, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please elaborate? Sources are presented, yes. I'm saying the sources presented are not GNG-worthy. MediaKyle (talk) 19:30, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
We could potentially redirect to United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative (or a subsection thereof) where it is currently mentioned in the interim. Alpha3031 (t • c) 07:12, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete: Does not appear to meet WP:ORGDEPTH. ~RAM (talk) 04:30, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:00, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fade258 (talk) 12:26, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was redirect to Sarah Michelle Gellar#Business and media. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 06:12, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Foodstirs

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I nominate Foodstirs for deletion. The article likely fails WP:GNG and does not demonstrate lasting WP:SUSTAINED notability as it lacks significant coverage in independent, reliable sources and exists mainly due to celebrity association rather than the company’s independent significance. Likely also fall under WP:COI concerns due to founder publicity.SanneMonte (talk) 09:35, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Companies, and California. Shellwood (talk) 21:44, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 November 20. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:53, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment What do you mean when referencing Conflict of Interest "due to founder publicity"? Are you suggesting Sarah Michelle Gellar is spending time editing a Wikipedia page about a now-defunct food brand?

A better argument would be that almost all of the sources dsicuss SMG rather than the company explicitly, but that argument has not been made so I won't yet vote. aesurias (talk) 22:17, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:40, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Cannot determine whether the company still exists. Link on the article was to a gambling (scam?) site so I updated to one of the pages that still seems to exist for the foodstirs company. I cannot tell if their products are still on sale or not or if the company actually shuttered in 2021 as stated in the article. Products are still listed on instacart but no other "reliable" places to order products (?). The only "in-depth" article I can find about their products is from slate, but it reads more like a blog and I'm not sure it should count toward notability for a company/product [27]. Other coverage is routine WP:NCORP coverage that doesn't establish notability (funding, uncritical coverage of product launches). Most articles lead with comments about Sarah Michelle Gellar as well, and the company seems to be receiving coverage mainly for that association as noted above. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 04:41, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect: The article text and available references describe a celebrity side-venture start-up and its funding, falling under WP:CORPTRIV. I am not seeing evidence of attained notability of the company itself. Sarah_Michelle_Gellar#Business_and_media has substantial coverage of this co-founder's involvement in the firm, so a redirect to there could be a reasonable outcome. AllyD (talk) 08:29, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - Strange to just delete something that is already covered elsewhere in Wikipedia. Discussed at Sarah Michelle Gellar so a redirect is an acceptable WP:ATD.--CNMall41 (talk) 06:36, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 20:59, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Sarah Michelle Gellar#Business and media, there it is even said that the company ceased operations in 2022. Kelob2678 (talk) 15:48, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Sarah Michelle Gellar#Business and media does make sense here. I don't see independent defunct brand notability in sources. Brosticate (talk) 10:24, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Sarah Michelle Gellar#Business and media as per WP:ATD. None of the sources meet GNG/NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 11:14, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Companies proposed deletions

[Turow_2014-1] Turow, Joseph (2014). "The Magazine Industry". Media Today: Mass Communication in a Converging World (5th ed.). New York: Routledge. pp. 252, 254. doi:10.4324/9780203111581-24. ISBN 978-1-136-27897-6 – via Google Books. MediaPost, a trade publisher for marketing and media practitioners, uses this [digital-focused] model. Go to MediaPost.com, and you can subscribe to its monthly print magazines, OMMA magazine and MEDIA magazine. You can also read the magazines' articles for free online, and you can read a huge number of other articles that stay digital. The digital and the printed versions are all supported by advertising. The company also makes money by mounting well-attended conferences for digital media and digital marketing practitioners. MediaPost charges hefty entry fees for the conferences and also gets support from firms that want to advertise to the attendees. [...] Earlier we discussed MediaPost as a trade magazine publisher. If you go to Mediapost.com, you will see that the company also describes itself as 'an integrated publishing and content company whose mission is to provide a complete array of resources for media, marketing and advertising professionals.' Among those resources is a 'portfolio of daily and weekly email newsletters.' There are over 50 of them, and they provide news in the categories of online media (e.g., Online Media Daily), traditional media (MediaDailyNews), and marketing (Marketing Daily).

[Burns_2017-2] Burns, Kelli S. (2017). Social Media: A Reference Handbook (1st ed.). Santa Barbara, Calif.: ABC-Clio. pp. 345–346. ISBN 979-8-216-14629-2 – via Internet Archive. MediaPost is a publishing and content company that offers resources to media, marketing, and advertising professionals. Besides conferences and events, MediaPost also publishes Mediapost.com, described as the 'largest and most influential media, marketing and advertising site on the net.' MediaPost's content is divided into publications that users can read online or have regularly delivered to their e-mail. Social Media & Marketing Daily, Video Daily, and Mobile Marketing Daily are three MediaPost publications that cover the social media industry.

[Oppenheim_2013-3] Oppenheim, Michael R.; Mulcahy, Wendy Diamond (2013). "Advertising and Media Planning Sources". Marketing Information: A Strategic Guide for Business and Finance Libraries (1st ed.). New York: Routledge. p. 168. doi:10.4324/9780203862469. ISBN 978-1-135-18558-9 – via Google Books. MediaPost (http://www.mediapost.com) is a subscription Web site that offers a directory of 60,000 media contacts covering radio, TV, cable, Internet, magazines, newspapers and agencies. As a 'portal' serving media buyers and planners, it offers other resources such as 'rate and data' services, research, ratings, productivity tools, and industry news.

[DeGaris_2015-4] DeGaris, Larry (2015). "A practical approach to sports marketing". Sports Marketing: A Practical Approach (1st ed.). London: Routledge. pp. 16–17. doi:10.4324/9780203097618. ISBN 978-1-136-22346-4 – via Google Books. A brief roster of important sources for marketing intelligence in sports marketing includes: [...] AdAge, Brandweek, MediaPost. Advertising, marketing, and media trade publications for insight into marketing in general.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]