Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/András Rosztóczy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:41, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

András Rosztóczy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think his citation record is enough for WP:PROF#C1 in a high-citation field, and we have no other evidence of WP:PROF nor WP:GNG notability. Was prodded in 2012 but the only significant change since then has been to add an indiscriminate and too-long list of selected publications. The article creator was banned from Wikimedia in 2020 for terms-of-use violations. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:30, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Hungary. Shellwood (talk) 23:32, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:24, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - we almost never keep an assistant professor per WP:PROF and WP:OUTCOMES. I wish it were true, because I would have multiple family members who are notable. Bearian (talk) 13:16, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This early-career subject is not notable enough to satisfy WP:NPROF. Qflib (talk) 19:11, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails NPROF. Herinalian (talk) 19:43, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.