Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Butlermations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (G11) by Jimfbleak. Non-admin closure. --MuZemike 12:23, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Butlermations

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Neither Butlermations nor Liam Butler come close to meeting Wikipedia’s notability criteria. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 08:13, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Not notable. Contains no reliable sources ("Information on Wikipedia must be verifiable; if no reliable, independent sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article." - WP:N) and the author also seems to have an undisclosed relationship with the subject of the article in question. EnIRtpf09b^{chat with me} 08:36, 1 February 2023 (UTC).[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation, Companies, and California. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:23, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.