Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elmo Motion Control
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Bosch Rexroth. (non-admin closure) Cavarrone 19:27, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Elmo Motion Control (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable company. WP:ROTM. Fails WP:NCORP. Cabrils (talk) 07:16, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Israel. Shellwood (talk) 11:35, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:51, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
- Merge (selectively) into Bosch Rexroth. The company is a subsidiary of Bosch Rexroth, presently an underdeveloped article. While it could be claimed that Rexroth should be merged into its parent, Bosch, currently it has its own article. That article is desperately in need of some of the content and references of Elmo Motion. gidonb (talk) 06:10, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete It doesn't seem to be notable enough to be kept unless by adding more related sources, or it could be merged ... 110 and 135 (talk) 15:25, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your openness to the ATD! It would really help the target plus PRESERVE work invested in the source! gidonb (talk) 15:54, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 10:01, 9 May 2025 (UTC)- Merge to Bosch Rexroth as suggested by @Gidonb. I didn't find coverage outside of Calcalist. Would change to keep if two more sources are found per WP:THREE. DCsansei (talk) 05:58, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.