Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Funhaven
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Draftify. Moved to Draft space despite this ongoing AFD discussion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:16, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Funhaven (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a company that doesn't meet atleast WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Zero reliable sources present, initially deleted as being too promotional, then later moved to draft and now re-created again in mainspace. Should probably WP:SALT. Jamiebuba (talk) 16:32, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 19:09, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Wow, this is promotional. Some scattered coverage over the years [1] and [2], but that's about all I can find. Nothing for GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 19:39, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- G11 Speedy Delete I tagged the article with a G11 speedy, the article is so promotional even if this company is notable it needs a WP:TNT. Jumpytoo Talk 21:57, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. This has been draftified, so now the AfD is probably moot. However, it's still blatantly promotional and I'd prefer a speedy deletion under G11. VickKiang (talk) 08:08, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.