Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Praktika (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:18, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Praktika (software)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG. Also, entirely promotional and no indication of WP:SUSTAINED notability. Amigao (talk) 23:46, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language, Companies, Artificial intelligence, and Software. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:17, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Complies with WP:NORG as 24 independent reference sources are provided as of today's date Alice8961 (talk) 16:51, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also seems like it complies with WP:SUSTAINED notability as the company got mentioned in several independent education lists and ranks in top 5 free apps, top 5 grossing apps and top 3 featured apps in the category of language learning according to AppMagic https://appmagic.rocks/top-charts/apps?date=2025-10-01&tag=36 Alice8961 (talk) 16:56, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - refbombing the article does not establish notability. Coverage of fundraising for startups is just run of the mill new reporting. The rest of the sources are not reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 03:01, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SERIESA/TOOSOON. Quick search seems to confirm that the CORPROUTINE funding announcements seems to be all that is out there. Quantity doesn't matter if none of the sources actually meet the criteria (I would say, counts against the topic, even). Alpha3031 (t • c) 10:33, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.