Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Very Mobile

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Wind Tre. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:51, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Very Mobile

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Originally created as a redirect by a user who is now blocked as an LTA (thus not notifying of this discussion). Subsequently it has been turned into an article and reverted into a redirect multiple times, to the extent that I can't really follow the history and I'm not certain if it's actually notable Taking Out The Trash (talk) 03:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Italy. Shellwood (talk) 09:39, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Very Mobile is one of the best-known Mobile Virtual Network Operators in Italy. Just like ho-mobile and Kena Mobile it has a direct relationship with a Mobile Network Operator (in the case of Very Mobile Wind Tre, in the case of ho-mobile Vodafone Italia, and in the case of Kena Mobile TIM). This makes them both much better known than other smaller MVNOs.62.18.48.161 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 14:10, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Wind Tre.Cant find a lot about this celluar provider.`~HelpingWorld~`^(👽🛸) 06:51, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
the Web is full of articles about Very Mobile... 62.18.48.251 (talk) 17:59, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It seems like there should be an appropriate redirect target here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:30, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 04:17, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm ok with the merge as proposed, I don't see much for the company than what's given. Oaktree b (talk) 15:38, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Wind Tre (about a single sentence worth merging). HighKing⁺⁺ 17:44, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.