🇮🇷 Iran Proxy | https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/ViaBTC
Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ViaBTC

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Vanamonde93 (talk) 21:09, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ViaBTC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The coverage is not from reliable sources: see WP:COINDESK, WP:INVESTOPEDIA, Cointelegraph. Fails WP:SIRS. JBchrch talk 15:23, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:25, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: examining the sources:
  • Cryptocurrency-centric sources are disallowed by WP:NCRYPTO: hashrateindex.com, Bitcoin News, CCN.com, Bitcoinist.com, bitcoinmagazine.com
  • Press releases from Business Wire are not independent.
  • Bloomberg source is trivial coverage, with a brief mention.
  • Coverage of the Bitcoin halving from FinanceFeeds, Investing News Network is trivial coverage that does not describe ViaBTC directly and in detail.
  • TheStreet is an interview of a ViaBTC employee without significant coverage of the company.
  • SCMP is also insignificant, one-sentence coverage.
🌊PacificDepths (talk) 07:36, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.