Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Confirmed
Confirmed
[edit]- Tlfarah (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting confirmed rights I would like to update my father's Wikipedia page to contain more information about his life. Tlfarah (talk) 19:16, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Tlfarah: Your request here does not make it clear what page you want to edit, nor why you would need "Confirmed" level permission to edit that page. Most pages do not require this. Also, I strongly suggest that you read WP:COI and properly declare your conflict of interest before proceeding further. - Jmabel | Talk 00:03, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
Not done * Pppery * it has begun... 21:36, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
- The Force Awakens The Last Jedi Who Became A Rouge One (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Becoming a manually "confirmed" user on Wikipedia earlier than the standard, automated route offers immediate access to critical editing tools, providing a substantial advantage for dedicated contributors and those involved in structured editing projects.
The standard autoconfirmed status requires an editor to wait four days and make ten edits naturally over time. Requesting manual confirmation bypasses this waiting period entirely, accelerating an editor's ability to fully participate in the encyclopedia's collaborative environment.
The primary motivation for seeking this status earlier is to immediately gain the trust and functionality necessary to circumvent anti-vandalism measures designed for brand-new accounts. Confirmed editors can instantly begin editing semi-protected pages, which are often high-traffic or controversial articles that administrators lock down to prevent disruption. Furthermore, they are immediately empowered to create new articles directly in the main encyclopedia space without the bottleneck of submitting drafts through the Articles for Creation process.
Early confirmation also unlocks essential account maintenance tasks, such as moving or renaming pages to correct titles and uploading files (images, multimedia) to support articles. For those participating in group editing events like edit-a-thons, obtaining this status immediately is crucial, as it allows participants to focus purely on content creation rather than administrative hurdles. In essence, seeking early confirmation is a practical step for serious editors to immediately remove the software limitations imposed on new users, allowing them to contribute efficiently and without artificial delay. The Force Awakens The Last Jedi Who Became A Rouge One (talk) 06:06, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- Manual confirmation of accounts on Wikipedia ahead of the standard automated route is almost never granted due to a combination of factors related to both practical concerns and the integrity of the platform.
- One of the primary reasons is the risk of abuse. If manual confirmation were readily granted to users before they have demonstrated a certain level of activity, it could open the door for bad actors to gain early access to privileges that are meant to be earned over time. These privileges, such as the ability to edit semi-protected pages or move articles, are typically reserved for users who have shown a commitment to the platform, not just those who want to bypass safeguards. Wikipedia's policies prioritize the security and stability of the encyclopedia, which is why they require users to have at least four days of activity and ten edits, ensuring they are familiar with basic editing practices and community norms before gaining more advanced permissions.
- Moreover, manual confirmation requires additional administrative oversight. Allowing manual requests for confirmation could result in an overwhelming workload for administrators, as they would need to review each request individually. This process, while possible, is resource-intensive and could lead to delays or inconsistencies, creating a bottleneck that undermines the efficiency of the entire community. The automated route, by contrast, ensures a more streamlined, impartial, and scalable process that minimizes human error and maximizes fairness.
- Lastly, Wikipedia's system is designed to promote a gradual and inclusive pathway for users to become trusted contributors. The four-day waiting period and ten edits are in place to ensure that new users can familiarize themselves with the community’s standards, policies, and the collaborative nature of the platform before they gain higher-level privileges. This measured approach helps prevent premature or unchecked access to powerful editing tools that could disrupt the integrity of the site. It balances accessibility with the need for responsible stewardship of an open, crowd-sourced resource.
- Therefore, while the desire to gain quicker access to editing privileges is understandable for active users, the Wikipedia community places significant value on a balanced, fair, and well-structured progression, and manual confirmations would disrupt that balance. Oh, and Not done. With help from a friendly neighborhood large language model, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:38, 7 December 2025 (UTC)