🇮🇷 Iran Proxy | https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WPSS/P
Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Shortcuts
WikiProject Stub sorting
Information
Project page talk
- Stub types (sections) talk
- Stub types (full list) talk
- To do talk
- Naming conventions talk
- Redirects category talk
Wikipedia:Stub talk
Discussion
Proposals (A) talk
- Current month
Discussion talk
Criteria (A) (discontinued) talk
Deletion (Log) (discontinued) talk
Category

On this WikiProject Stub sorting subpage, you can propose new stub types (please read the procedures beforehand!), as well as the reorganization and subdivision of existing stub types. You can also discuss anything else related to stubs on the talk page.

Proposing new stub types – procedure

[edit]

Important: If you wish to propose the creation of a stub article you've come to the wrong place. If you don't have a username yourself, please go to WP:AFC for proposing a new article. If you already have a username, you can create the article yourself. If you don't know how, add {{Helpme}} to your user talk page to request help from other editors. This page only deals with stub templates and categories; we cannot help you with creating articles.

Proposing new stub types
If you wish to propose a new stub category and template, please follow these procedures:
  1. Check the List of stub types or under Category:Stub categories to make sure that your proposed new stub does not already exist.
  2. List it at the top of the current month's section, under a header, like the ones shown (if any). Sign it with a datestamp (~~~~).
    • Please bear in mind that a stub category isn't about the importance or notability of the topic!
  3. Find a good number[1] of stub articles, as many as you can, that will fit that template. You may use this tool to scan through categories; tagged stubs are always in Category:All stub articles and transclude {{asbox}}. Each of these articles can be:
    • currently marked with {{stub}};
    • currently marked with another type of stub tag (in which case you should justify why your tag is better for the article than the current one);
    • a stub whose categorisation is highly ambiguous or questionable;
    • not marked as a stub.
  4. If you use any category scan (from the tool mentioned above or from any other), please link to it so that other users can confirm that the results are still accurate.
  5. Others may do the same, if they so desire.
  6. 5 days after listing it here, if there is general approval or no objection, go ahead and create the new category and/or template following the format on Wikipedia:Stub. List the new stub type on the stub types list in an appropriate section. If consensus is not clear, or discussion is still ongoing, the proposal will remain open until consensus can be reached.
  7. If you wish to propose a stub type which does not currently have 60 articles that could use it, you may propose an upmerged template in a similar way. An upmerged template would feed into currently existing stub categories until such time that there are enough stubs for a separate stub category. At that point a category for it may be separately proposed. Some times, it may be difficult to be sure how many stubs would get a tag - in which case you can also start with an upmerged stub tag until you're sure there are enough.

DO NOT place a proposal here for any stub type which has already been created and is being discussed at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. The proposal page is only for stub types that have not yet been created, and it is better to keep any discussion of such stub types in one place rather than splitting it between different pages. Wikipedia:Categories for discussion is the correct page for proposals to delete a stub type.

^ Good number means about 60 articles or more, or 30 or more if it is the primary stub type of a WikiProject, though this figure may vary from case to case.

"Speedy creation"

[edit]

A stub type may be proposed for "speedy creation" if it meets one of the following criteria:

  • S1 - the creation of a category for which an approved upmerged template already exists and is now in use on more than 60 articles.
  • S2 - the creation of an upmerged national-level template for a subject in which other such national-level templates currently exist (e.g., X-bio-stub, X-hist-stub, or X-geo-stub, where X is the name of an internationally widely recognised country) or other instances where a clearly established pattern of similar subtypes exists. The proposed topic may not be controversial in scope.

List speedy creation proposals in the same proposal listings as normal stub proposals below.

Proposals, December 2025

[edit]

Please check how many articles qualify for a stub type before proposing it.

NEW PROPOSALS

[edit]
Note to stub creators:
When creating stub types, please list them on the stub type list.

Proposals, November 2025

[edit]

Ammonite sub-stubs

[edit]

Ammonite stubs is huge. I propose the following splits:

Speedy

[edit]

Just the one

Waacstats (talk) 19:28, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Isopod stubs

[edit]

Another category closer to 600 than 500. I propose th following splits based on perm cats:

Waacstats (talk) 19:28, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

UK MP for England stubs

[edit]

CAtegory is getting large at over 500 articles. We already have three sub categories for different parties, I'd like to propose a former party category in the following:

Waacstats (talk) 19:28, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

American computer scientist stubs

[edit]

American scientist is over 500 and computer scientist is getting bigger. Looking at articles in the permenant category that have either category we have over 170 articles therefore I propose:

While we are at it, the same search shows that there are 79 articles that could take the following:

Waacstats (talk) 19:28, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

London stubs

[edit]

A fast growing category, has pushed through the 600 barrier. It has a lot of local council wards in there. I propose splitting these off:

Waacstats (talk) 19:28, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pieridae stubs

[edit]

Closing in on 600 stubs, I proposewe split by the nest level per the perm cats:

Waacstats (talk) 19:28, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have another split to propose:
There's also the possibility of Pierini stubs within the category I proposed - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 09:24, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Italian train station stubs

[edit]

I think we need to ignore my proposal from earlier this month regarding this category, I forgot that metro stations go in the rapid transit categories not the train station categories. Therefore I have removed the metro stations from the Italian train station categories and then propose the following speediable category

Waacstats (talk) 19:28, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll create the category in the morning - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 05:42, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

South Korea mountain stubs

[edit]

I propose {{SouthKorea-mountain-stub}}, South Korea mountain stubs; 307 - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 04:46, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese athletics biographies

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
We have four athletics category break the 500 mark, propose we split these like we have with other countries, by event:

Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Sri Lankan cricket biography, 1990s birth stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 500 I propose we split by yob following this pattern

Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support, but please change 1990 to 1990s in the proposal - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 22:30, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This is for the a by year split so 1990, 1991, 1992 etc rather than the 1990s decade which we already have. sorry for the confusion. Waacstats (talk) 18:47, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oh! In that case, go for it! :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 19:00, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

French castle stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Starting to get big, we have already split out Grand Est so I propose we continue with the other regions.

names are taken from the geo categories. Catgeories only for those that pass 60. Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Andalusia geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category over 500 and we have already started breaking this down by province, I propose we finish this off with the following:

Obviously cateogries only for those that make it to 60 Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support ravioli, ravioli, bring on the categories :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 19:01, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Canadian geologic formation stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 500 and could do with a split by province/territory, I therefore propose the following:

Obviously cateogries only for those that make it to 60. Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Białystok_County_geography_stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is over 500 I propose splitting by Gmina,

Obviously categories only for those that reach 60.Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 12:09, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Asian dessert stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose splitting Dessert stubs:

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 12:24, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

looks good to me. Waacstats (talk) 20:49, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As a parent-only cat, I don't think Category:Asian dessert stubs needs a template, unless you want to remove the parent-only status? Her Pegship (?) 20:04, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Orchidoideae sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Orchidoideae stubs is big; I propose the following split:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1920s American silent drama film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I'm taking a break from creating new stubs for the time being, but I'll still be here to propose any new ideas. Anyway, 1920s silent drama film stubs is pretty big; I propose the following split:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Labour MP for England stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Starting to get large,, suggest they follow the conservative party and be split by decade of birth:

Waacstats (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

American historian stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This one is definitely oversized (over 1000) and has braved attempts previously to split by area of interest. I prospose splitting this by decade of birth:

Waacstats (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support, but your split uses {{US-photographer-stub}} instead of {{US-historian-stub}}:
If we're really going to do this, then the "areas of interest" categories should be upmerged to fit the proposal - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:54, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
More:
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

American photographers

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Definitely getting large, I believe best way to cull this might be by decade of birth. I did think of artistic v journalistic but that seems not to work to well.

Waacstats (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

American economists

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Started to get large propose a by century split as birth year isn't always included and I cant find a decade that takes 60.

Waacstats (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support as long as the stub template uses -20C- rather than -20thC-. Her Pegship (?) 22:30, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Un-closing, as the note said "create as revised"; the template should be {{US-economist-20C-stub}}, as previously established in other templates, without the "th". Please re-create as revised. Her Pegship (?) 18:30, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Indonesia stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 500 and in need of a good sort, though the following categories will help with this:

I know we dont normally split languages by nation but given the fact that we have over 80 articles here I think this is a viable category. Waacstats (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ghana stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A quick sort has brought this down, it could easily be taken much lower by splitting out the local festivals

Waacstats (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

French nobility stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create as revised.
Closing in on the 600 mark I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should the templates be -count- and -duke- without the caps? Her Pegship (?) 22:42, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Good catch, thankyou. Waacstats (talk) 18:26, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

United States naval ship stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create as revised.
Starting to get large, I propose culling this with the following:

not the sexiest of ship types but we don't appear to have enough of any of the more sexy ships. Waacstats (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I propose we use "tugboat" instead of "tug" (less vernacular), i.e. United States Navy tugboat stubs {{US-navy-tugboat-stub}}. There aren't any other tugboat stub types, so this would set an example for any to come. Her Pegship (?) 20:51, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes that does sound better, dont know why i suggested "tug". I will amend now.Waacstats (talk) 18:28, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Italian railway station stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Starting to get large, we have a number of stations here that are actually for metro stations as opposed to train stations (some of the rail enthusiasts can be quite specific about this). I propose we split out the Rome and Milan metros as they appear to have enough articles.

Waacstats (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

German painter stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another category that could do with a cull. I suggest the following

Categories for those that reach 60 - the first three only unless theres some hiding. Waacstats (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support ravioli ravioli, bring on the categories :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:40, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support but I think all the other -century- stubs are formed as {{Fooian-19C-stub}} without the "th". Her Pegship (?) 22:29, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I based this off templates on the {{Italy-painter-20thC-stub}}. We seem to have a mix of both "20thC" and "20C". Waacstats (talk) 18:34, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
OK then... never mind :) Her Pegship (?) 19:50, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Australian rules football stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another over 500 that could do with a cull

Waacstats (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Estonian counties

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Two Counties are over the 500 mark and could do with a cull. I propose the following

The rural municipalities are called "Parish" while the urban municipalities are not. Also the categorisation by municipality is not great. Waacstats (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support, but I had to modify some of the templates so we don't end up creating extra - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:41, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedies

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
following are ready for categories:

Waacstats (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:43, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

College basketball season stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is nearing 600 and could do with a split, I propose following the college football and splitting by decade:

Waacstats (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Election stub categories

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Looking through some of the larger grandchild categories of Category:United States election stubs, I see that: Category:Vermont election stubs has 152 pages, of which 91 are about gubernatorial elections (using my browser's find function); Category:Connecticut election stubs has 173 pages, of which 88 are about gubernatorial elections (using my browser's find function); and Category:Texas election stubs has 165 pages, of which 97 are about Texas House of Representatives districts (using my browser's find function).

Looking beyond just the United States: there are 203 pages that would fit into a hypothetical Category:London elections stubs, of which 104 pages would fit into a hypothetical Category:London Borough council election stubs; 125 out of 166 pages in Category:Japanese election stubs are gubernatorial elections (using my browser's find function); at least[nb 1] 103 out of 172 pages in Category:Malaysian election stubs are state constituency pages (using my browser's find function); there are 185 pages that would fit into a hypothetical Category:European Parliament election stubs; there are 88 pages that would fit into a hypothetical Category:Nigerian election stubs; there are 96 pages that would fit into a hypothetical East Midlands election stubs; there are 295 pages that would fit into a hypothetical East of England election stubs; there are 134 pages that would fit into a hypothetical North West English election stubs; there are 178 pages that would fit into a hypothetical South East England election stubs; there are 121 pages that would fit into a hypothetical South West England election stubs; there are 121 pages that would fit into a hypothetical West Midlands (region) election stubs; there are 78 pages that would fit into a hypothetical Yorkshire and the Humber election stubs; and there are 715 pages that would fit into a hypothetical Category:England by-election stubs, of which 78 pages would fit into a hypothetical Category:East of England by-election stubs, 106 pages would fit into a hypothetical Category:North West England by-election stubs, 129 pages would fit into a hypothetical Category:South East England by-election stubs, 101 pages would fit into a hypothetical Category:South West England by-election stubs, and 81 pages would fit into a hypothetical Category:West Midlands (region) by-election stubs.

To summarize, here is a list of stub categories that I am proposing creating (with subcategories of multiple proposed categories repeated), along with the number of pages that would fit into each:

Care to differ or discuss with me? The Nth User 04:48, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support looks good to me - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 05:02, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I just thought of some more.

Care to differ or discuss with me? The Nth User 05:31, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support looks like a really comprehensive improvement. Waacstats (talk) 19:17, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not a reply to the proposal, but a suggestion: the reference note "nb-1" you use doesn't appear except in "edit" mode (see here; if you want folks to see it, perhaps you should reformat it without using the nb code. Her Pegship (?) 01:36, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I actually just added the template to the bottom of this section so it wouldn't disrupt the flow. Care to differ or discuss with me? The Nth User 16:12, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm guessing that there is probably a bot that would make the process of updating stub templates easier, but I don't know what its name is. I thought of looking through the edit history of pages that have been put into stub categories recently approved here, but looking at a page transcluding the recently-created Template:1930s-UK-drama-film-stub yielded a non-bot edit, looking at a page transcluding the recently-created Template:1950s-musical-film-stub yielded a non-bot edit, and looking at a page transcluding the recently-created Template:Pennsylvania-PARepresentative-Democratic-stub yielded a non-bot edit, so maybe there isn't a bot for this, but this still feels like something that a bot would have been created for, and the existence of PetScan indicates that using a bot would be possible. Could someone please tell me if there is a bot for this? I would obviously prefer to not edit stub templates on over 1,500 pages manually if I don't have to. Care to differ or discuss with me? The Nth User 16:12, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ Not all state constituency pages have state constituency in the title, but PetScan doesn't work here because there is no category containing Malaysia state constituencies but not Malaysia federal constituencies.
Comment: closing as "create" with recommendation that the bot question be posed on the project talk page. Her Pegship (?) 22:42, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mongolian politician stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was do not create.
Proposal to create Mongolian politician stubs, {{Mongolian-politician-stubs}}, every other east asian countries have their own stubs. East Asian politician stubs have a lot of uncategorized pages of Mongolian politicians. - Egzs (talk) 05:50, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support, but we already have {{Mongolia-politician-stub}} - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 14:08, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As Opal says, we already have the template, we normally wait till we have 60 articles to go with a category. Waacstats (talk) 16:50, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, a lot of the Mongolian politician articles are not categorized because of no specific category. I can raise the amount, if its okay Egzs (talk) 17:15, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, currently 25 articles use this template. Her Pegship (?) 19:07, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Crossotini sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose making Frea (beetle) stubs, {{Frea-stub}} - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:02, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support looks good. Waacstats (talk) 16:56, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Columbellidae sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose the following split for Columbellidae stubs:

Support looks good. Waacstats (talk) 16:55, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Camaenidae sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Split for Camaenidae stubs:

Support looks good. Waacstats (talk) 16:55, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ziguinchor region geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Senegal geography stubs is pretty big; I propose the following split:

Support looks good, might be worthwhile having templates for the other regions. Waacstats (talk) 16:54, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Irish Conservative Party MP stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

Support looks like a good start, I was planning at looking at myself. Waacstats (talk) 16:53, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Tetraserica stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Melolonthinae stubs is pretty beefy; I propose the following split:

Support looks good to me. Waacstats (talk) 16:51, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This weeks speedies

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The list for this week

Waacstats (talk) 18:04, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Film stubs breakdown

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Following on from last weeks theme, there are two more film categories that are closing in on 600 articles and I would like to breakdown in the following ways:

templates for any decade we have articles for and categories for any templates that have 60 articles Waacstats (talk) 18:04, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hungarian footy players

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The hungarian midfielders have surpassed 500 articles and so I would like to split this by decade of birth as per numerous precedent and while we are at it to do the same with the defenders and forwards which we have done elsewhere.

obviously templates for each year and categories for those years that pass 60. Waacstats (talk) 18:04, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of some footy cats

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Some of the football categories are creeping over 500 or 600 articles, I'd like to cull these back a bit unfortunatly we have already split by position and decade of birth of birth. Following the example set in the Russian categories I will propose the following splits:

obviously templates for each year and categories for those years that pass 60. Waacstats (talk) 18:04, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Aussie rules footballers

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Sticking with the theme from above, a couple of Australian rules football by decade categories are starting to get to the point of needing a split. I propose the same thing here:

obviously templates for each year and categories for those years that pass 60. Waacstats (talk) 18:04, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Olympic medalists

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Three countries have more than 500 articles in there Olympic medalist categories. I would like to prune these back with the following:

Waacstats (talk) 18:04, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Rissoidae stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is over 600, we can cull this back with the following:

Waacstats (talk) 18:04, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support; gets them off the list :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:50, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Polyommatini stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is over 600, we can cull this back with the following:

Waacstats (talk) 18:04, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 19:58, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

More Cassidinae sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
More splits for Cassidinae stubs:

After this is created, I plan on notifying Categories for Discussion to upmerge Oediopalpa stubs - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:12, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 19:36, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Terelliini stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose the following sub-stubs of Tephritinae stubs:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This weeks speedies

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This weeks list

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of 1910s drama films

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create as revised.
Not sure about this one but given the fact that there are over 1000 articles here. the following would take over 400 articles:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support, but I think it would be "1910s lost", not "Lost 1910s", though I could be wrong... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:34, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Good catch, that fits in better with the existing perm cats, I'll change this to
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of 1960s Italian film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category over 500, could do with a cull I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support go for it :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:34, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of 1970s Italian film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category over 500, could do with a cull I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of 1920s British film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category over 500, could do with a cull I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of 1930s British film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category over 500, could do with a cull I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of 1930s French Film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 600 articles I propose the following split, that should halve the category:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Musical film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 500 articles I propose the following split by decade:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Musical comedy film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 500 articles I propose the following split by decade, and subcat to the above:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

US state house politicians

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A couple of US states have already had there politician stub categories split out members of the state senate and state house, 4 of these are now over 500, i propose following Wisconsin's example and splitting by party:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Democratic party member of the Wisconsin State Assembly stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Having mentioned the Wisonsin State Assembly above, the Demoocrats could do with a cull, following their Republican colleagues I propose a by decade of birth split such as:

templates for all decades we have articles with categories for those that reach 60. Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposals, October 2025

[edit]

Speedy

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Just the onetwo this week

Waacstats (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:48, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Negro league baseball outfielder stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I have just pushed this one over 500 by sorting out its parent, we could do with culling it by decade of birth, just like the pitchers anad infielders, for example:

template for each decade that we have articles and categories for those that pass the 60 mark. Waacstats (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support all of the proposals :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 20:20, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Polish actor stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 500, could do with a cull, propose following precedent with the following:

TV and voice actors are showing as short of the 60 but propose categories for iff they reach 60 when sorted. Waacstats (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Agapanthiini stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is over 700 articles I propose following the permcats and splitting as follows:

Waacstats (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Various US politician splits

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A number of US states have politician cateogries that have passed the 500 mark, I propose we split these by members of the states senate and house.

Waacstats (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of North Dakota

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

All the counties have templates, I propose the following breakdown based on this image
Regions of North Dakota

Waacstats (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support ravioli, ravioli, please make the categories! :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:53, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of South Dakota

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

All the counties have templates, I propose the following split based on this image
Regions of South Dakota

Waacstats (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Oklahoma

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

All the counties have templates, I propose the following split based on this image
Regions of South Dakota

Waacstats (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of New Mexico

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

All the counties have templates, I propose the following split based on this image
Regions of South Dakota

Waacstats (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Kentucky geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category already has some splits I propose the following based on the fact that we still have 700 articles in the main category

Waacstats (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Trechinae sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose the following split for Trechinae stubs:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

More Tephritinae sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose splitting up Tephritinae stubs accordingly:

Support Anouther one that is definitly needed and looks good. Waacstats (talk) 21:36, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I also plan on making Myopitini stubs ({{Myopitini-stub}}), which will have Urophora stubs, among other articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:56, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cassidinae sub-stubs, part 2

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Cassidinae stubs is still pretty beefy; I propose the following splits:

Support This looks good and defintly needed. Waacstats (talk) 21:36, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Negro league baseball infielder stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another one closing in on 600 culling it by decade of birth for example:

template for each decade that we have articles and categories for those that pass the 60 mark Waacstats (talk) 16:07, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support as per usual :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:54, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Japanese baseball pitcher stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another one over 500 culling it by decade of birth for example:

template for each decade that we have articles and categories for those that pass the 60 mark Waacstats (talk) 16:07, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Dutch football biography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A football biography category which we have already split by position, however a couple of these have gotten a bit sizeable and could do with a further split, following multiple precedents by decade of birth, for example:

template for each decade that we have articles and categories for those that pass the 60 mark Waacstats (talk) 16:07, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

American golf tournament stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
OVer 500 and could do with a cull,

Waacstats (talk) 16:07, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Kabaddi players

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
We have over 100 stub articles relating to kabaddi players, I therefore propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 16:07, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support ravioli ravioli, bring on the categories :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:00, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This weeks speediable finds

Waacstats (talk) 16:07, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support getting on it right now - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:30, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Tephritinae sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Tephritinae stubs is looking pretty big; I propose the following splits:

Support a good one to reduce at 1400 articles total. Waacstats (talk) 16:11, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Central Bosnia Canton geography sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Central Bosnia Canton geography stubs is pretty big; I propose the following split:

Support No issues here, again might be an idea to have all the municipalities.Waacstats (talk) 16:09, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Zenica-Doboj Canton geography sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Zenica-Doboj Canton geography stubs is pretty beefy; I propose the following splits:

Support is it worth doing templates for the other municipalites? Waacstats (talk) 16:10, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ardabil province geography sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Ardabil province geography stubs deserves some extra splits:

Looks good, can i suggest we add temmplates for the Counties that dont make 60. Waacstats (talk) 16:08, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Louisiana geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

We have split Louisiana by parish templates but no PArish was big enough for its own category therefore I suggest we split by region based on this image
Regions of Louisiana

{{BienvilleParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{BossierParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{CaddoParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{CaldwellParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{ClaiborneParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{DeSotoParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{EastCarrollParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{FranklinParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{JacksonParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{LincolnParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{MadisonParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{MorehouseParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{OuachitaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{RedRiverParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{RichlandParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{TensasParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{UnionParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{WebsterParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{WestCarrollParishLA-geo-stub}} and {{WinnParishLA-geo-stub}}

{{AllenParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{BeauregardParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{CatahoulaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{ConcordiaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{GrantParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{LaSalleParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{NatchitochesParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{RapidesParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{SabineParishLA-geo-stub}} and {{VernonParishLA-geo-stub}}

{{AcadiaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{AscensionParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{AssumptionParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{AvoyellesParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{CalcasieuParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{CameronParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{EvangelineParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{IberiaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{IbervilleParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{JeffersonDavisParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{LafayetteParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{LafourcheParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{PointeCoupeeParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StCharlesParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StJamesParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StJohntheBaptistParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StLandryParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StMartinParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StMaryParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{TerrebonneParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{VermilionParishLA-geo-stub}} and {{WestBatonRougeParishLA-geo-stub}}

{{EastBatonRougeParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{EastFelicianaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{LivingstonParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StHelenaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StTammanyParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{TangipahoaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{WashingtonParishLA-geo-stub}} and {{WestFelicianaParishLA-geo-stub}}

{{JeffersonParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{OrleansParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{PlaqueminesParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StBernardParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StCharlesParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StJamesParishLA-geo-stub}} and {{StJohntheBaptistParishLA-geo-stub}} Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Telecommunication stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
About to break 700 I propose we split out the following categories:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Phytoseiidae stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another one getting large with two possible splits:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Liberal Party of Australia politician stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is ready to break into the 600 club, I propose the following splilt:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Australia television show stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Starting to creep up, I propose the following two splits per other countries that we have split:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Australia athletics biographies

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
We have another athletics category break the 600 mark, propose we split this like we have with other countries, by event:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Oklahoma and the Dakotas

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Following on from last month, all three states are starting to get large. I would like to propose splitting these with by county templates, categories for any that make 60 and then we can more clearly see what we have regarding regional categories. Templates and categories of the following formats for each county:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:09, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cicindelidae stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 600 articles, can easily be split by the following two categories:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

speedy

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A few speedies for this week:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Compact object stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Compact object stubs ({{compact-object-stub}}) For neutron stars and black holes. Found 76 applicable articles via category search. Shocksingularity (talk) 05:49, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably the parent cat would be Category:Compact stars? Her Pegship (?) 19:28, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, plus possibly some intermediate-mass/supermassive BHs Shocksingularity (talk) 21:11, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hymenobacter stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose making Hymenobacter stubs ({{Hymenobacter-stub}}) for over 60 articles in Cytophagia stubs - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:23, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Myrmicinae sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Myrmicinae stubs is pretty big; I propose the following split:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Potter wasp sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Potter wasp stubs is pretty big; I propose the following sub-stub:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cicindelidae sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Cicindelidae stubs is pretty big; I propose the following splits:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Lebiinae sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Lebiinae stubs is pretty beefy; I propose the following split:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Trechinae sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Trechinae stubs is pretty beefy, and not in the good way. I propose the following split:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Platyninae sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Platyninae stubs is pretty big; I propose the following split:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Staphyliniformia stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This category/template, Staphyliniformia stubs ({{Staphyliniformia-stub}}) will contain Staphylinoidea stubs and 353 pages - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 23:10, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Bostrichoidea sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Bostrichoidea stubs is a little big; I propose the following splits:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Elaphidiini sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Elaphidiini stubs is pretty big; I propose the following:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Saperdini sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Saperdini stubs is pretty beefy. I propose the following subcats/temps:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Onciderini sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Onciderini stubs is pretty big. I propose:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mesosini sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Mesosini stubs is pretty beefy, and not in the good way. I propose:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Agapanthiini sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Agapanthiini stubs is getting really big; I propose the following splits:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Barisal Division geography sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Barisal Division geography stubs is pretty beefy; I propose the following subcats/temps:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposals, September 2025

[edit]

Cambodia geography sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Cambodia geography stubs is pretty big; I propose the following subcats/temps:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:52, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mersin Province geography sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Mersin Province geography stubs is pretty beefy; I propose the following splits:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:52, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

South Korean railway station sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
South Korean railway station stubs is pretty big; I propose the following subcategories/templates:

Support no issues here that i can see. Waacstats (talk)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Yorkshire and the Humber railway station sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create as revised.
I propose the following as a subcat of Yorkshire and the Humber railway station stubs and Railway stations in Yorkshire:

Given the size of the split is it worth splitting this directly to North/South/West and East Riding? Waacstats (talk) 08:26, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not keen on having Yorkshire railway station stubs as a single sub-group because they make up the vast bulk of Yorkshire and the Humber railway station stubs: there are comparatively few that aren't in Yorkshire. The ones that would be left behind would comprise those in North Lincolnshire (20 stub articles out of 46) together with those in North East Lincolnshire (2 stub articles out of 36), which even taken together don't have many stations. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:30, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Italian railway station sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create as revised.
Italian railway station stubs is pretty big; I propose the following subcategories/templates:

Support the idea here but we normally go with the place name as you have above rather than a demonym. Waacstats (talk) 08:06, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So it would be Lombardy, Apulia, Lazio and Piedmont for the categories, too? - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 23:58, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I would say so, for some reason (lost to time) we have gone with demonym for continent and country level but then place name below that, at least from what I can see. Waacstats (talk) 21:55, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Gaziantep Province geography sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Gaziantep Province geography stubs is pretty big; I propose the following subcategories/templates:

Altered the Nizip district for you (missed space) other than that these look ok. Waacstats (talk) 07:59, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Kastamonu Province geography sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Kastamonu Province geography stubs is looking pretty big; I propose the following subcats/temps:

Support these. Waacstats (talk) 08:03, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Castilla–La Mancha geography substubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Castilla–La Mancha geography stubs is pretty beefy; I propose the following subcats/temps:

Not seeing any issues on these. Waacstats (talk) 08:02, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Basque Country geography sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Basque Country geography stubs is pretty big; I propose the following splits:

Other than the Basque being a country rather than a county (I changed the category link) these look goods. Waacstats (talk) 08:01, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 15:10, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cassidinae stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I have only just proposed a split of this last week and it has doubled in size to over 1200 articles (after I split out 166) I can now find another three genus' that have enough articles for there own templates so propose the following:

These will still leave it oversized but it is a good start. Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support every bit helps! :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:46, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It has gone up to 1900. I propose more:
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 06:49, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support extension of my proposal, hopefully we can get it down somewhere close to a reasonable size. Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

By-elections to the Parliament of the United Kingdom in English constituency stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Starting to get large we have already split out London, I propose we atleast create templates for the other regions and categories for any of those regions that reach 60:

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Colorado, Louisiana and New Mexico

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
All three states are strating to get large. I would like to propose splitting these with by county templates, categories for any that make 60 and then we can more clearly see what we have regarding regional categories. Templates and categories of the following formats:

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support, but please be a little more specific, if that makes sense. I don't want to accidentally create something generic... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 06:51, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, given the fact that there is about 64, 64 and 33 counties in each I din't really want to write all of them out. I mean that for example taking Santa Fe County, New Mexico I propose we go with Category:Sante Fe County, New Mexico geography stubs and {{SantaFeNM-geo-stub}}. I hope that makes sense. Waacstats (talk) 21:48, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Okay - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:06, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Idk maybe I can make a Google spreadsheet for all of them? There will be a lot of copypaste involved, but I wanna know what you think - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:07, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Veneto geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another Italian category getting large we have previously split Italian regions by Province so propose we follow suit here.

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Bacteroidota stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This category was over 600 till it was sorted, could do with some more sub categories to get it down a bit more, based on the permcat I propose the following:

Also to tidy up the largest subcat I propose

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support the first one has already been created, btw - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:07, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Kachin State geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another one getting large, we have previously split the Myanmar states by district. This one only has six districts, two of which have categories and seem to have almost all the articles. I propose all the templates anyway just in case someone comes back and finishes these off. As usual templates first categories for those that reach 60:

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support. I withdrew my version of the request because it was an unintentional duplicate - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 13:45, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cymbidieae stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Yet another one that was getting larger. I propose reducing this down with the following

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Italian film actors

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another one getting large, propose we follow suit for other nations and split by decade of birth along the lines of:

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support, but I think we can go all the way for this one:
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:17, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hemilophini stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
creeping up. The following would help prevent that.

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:10, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mississippi politician stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another one getting large, I propose we follow other states and split out the state level politicians

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Tineidae

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Again creeping up, propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:33, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedies

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This weeks list, the 1930s NZ RU bio might be 1 short, but it is close enough and it would look odd going from 20s to 40s, and 1910s is only at 40 so a bit too far away yet.

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Bolu Province geography sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Bolu Province geography stubs is looking pretty big; I propose the following subtemplates/subcategories:

Support, no issues that I can see. I am beginning to wonder if Turkish Provinces are the new French Departments. Waacstats (talk) 13:03, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I hope not - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 06:52, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Waacstats I created them :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:49, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Aegean region geography sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Aegean region geography stubs isn't too big, but I'd like to propose a sub-stub:

Actually, I just took a look at the number of transclusions for that redirect, and it looks like the category should be speedily created - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 21:46, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Afyonkarahisar Province geography sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Afyonkarahisar Province geography stubs is pretty beefy; I propose splitting it up into subtemplates/subcategories when needed:

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 21:01, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see anything wrong with these. Waacstats (talk) 19:55, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Scythrididae sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The following will be a subcategory of Scythrididae stubs and Scythris:

I have no issues with this one. Waacstats (talk) 20:02, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Xyloryctidae sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The following will be a subcategory of Xyloryctidae stubs and Cryptophasa:

Support No issues with this one either. Waacstats (talk) 20:04, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Coleophoridae sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Coleophoridae stubs is a beefy category, because 99% of the articles are coleophora. I propose making {{Coleophora-stub}} (Coleophora stubs) for 1,374 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:56, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

River sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
All of these will be subcategories of their respective "[Country] river stubs" and "[Division] geography stubs" parent categories:

Russia

[edit]

India

[edit]
Although I support these, just a warning, I think the Indian counts might be inflated as there are a number of categories that fall onto one or both of these that arent exclusive, for example, Category:Rivers of the Western Ghats falls into both of these categories and a number of others, Category:Tributaries of the Narmada River is in the MAharashtra and Madhya Pradesh. Also there may be some undercounts as articles have {{Maharashtra-geo-stub}} or one of its subcats. I suggest the old mantra, templates first, categories of they prove to be over 60, just be careful. Waacstats (talk) 21:11, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Lebanon geography sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create as revised.
Lebanon geography stubs is getting pretty beefy; I propose the following subcats/temps:

I think the template for the last one should be written out in full as {{MountLebanonGovernate-geo-stub}} but otherwise I see no issues with these. Waacstats (talk) 20:56, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

15th-century English MP stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
We have split most of the other English MP by century categories by parliament now, only this and the 18th century(7 years) remain. This one is getting large so I propose following the precedent and splitting by parliament. There are a large number of these, nearly enough to have a stub category for the templates, but most categories contain fewer than 60 articles so yes there will be a large overlap but hopefully not too bad. I have proposed all the categories and templates, just incase someone wants to make the missing articles in the mean time.

Waacstats (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:09, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to create these. Please keep in mind that I'm not at home right now - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 13:47, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
They've been created. You can request small categories to be deleted once everything is sorted out - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 06:54, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Australia politician stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
One that keeps creeping up. We have already split out the mayors and diplomats, we have then split out by party and then split one of those parties by where they sit (each state/senate/representative). I can find no party that would pass the 60 mark however I propose we split by state parliment that people sat in, a number of these would already have sub categories as we have split the Labor party politicians. ACT is likely to be too small for a category, the others should easily pass 60

Waacstats (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Polish Sejm member stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another one in the 700 range that could do with a trim and this one is only 6 months old. I'm fairly sure we will end up with some multi-stubbing as we do when we split the English mps but by Sejm looks the best way to go. Yes the 1989 Sejm is called the Contract Sejm in both the article and category so I have followed suit, a good encyclopedia will give further information if you wish to read up on the reasoning:

Waacstats (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support looks good to me :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:19, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedies

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A few for this week,

Waacstats (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Great Britain MP (1707–1800) for England stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
We have recently been splitting these categories by parliment, thought it best to follow suit but not really happy with how the names came out, anyone any better ideas. Anyhow the templates and categories would be as follows, given large overlap we should be able to create all the categogries but just in case categories iff the templates reach 60:

Support - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:11, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wait! You misspelled "Britain" in the categories! - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:11, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed it nvm - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:03, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that, can't even spell my home country's name right. God help me. Waacstats (talk) 21:15, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't know you were British! I guess I learn something new every day :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 22:03, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of South Australia geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Similar to Asturias below, we could go with LGA's but I feel there are too many of them and none will reach 60 so I propose the LGA regions, unfortunatly we do not have permcats for these so a hand sort will be needed but I always was a glutton for punishment:

Waacstats (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Aasturias geogrpahy stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This one is closing in on 700 articles, We have a choice of by Comarca or by municipality. It doesn't look like any individual municipality will get over 60 so I propose it would be more sensible to split by Comarca. I did think of using upmerged by munucipality templates as this information is more often included in articles but at 79, it felt like doing a US state split again and I'm not ready for that:

Waacstats (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cycling race stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 600 articles, we have already split out some countries and even specific races, I am unable to find any more caountries to split out and therefore propose the following to take caere of any races IN Europe as opposed to just European championships:

Waacstats (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Prešov Region geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Starting to get large at 650, we have a nice by district split that we can use and I therefore propose the following templates, with categories for those that pass the 60 mark:

Waacstats (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Sport of athletics stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Not big enough to need a split but could be tidied up by the following category:

Waacstats (talk) 13:48, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Urmia_County_geography_stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized, per other Iranian counties I propose splitting by district as follows

This will all require a handsort, but from a quick look most articles have the Bakhsh or District listed, as usual templates first then category. Waacstats (talk) 13:48, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
New finds this month:

Waacstats (talk) 13:48, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

American physicist stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This is another new one to the over 600 list that may be my fault that it grew. I did think that splitting by dob might be the best but as we split the biologists and chemists by areas of interest I propose the same here:

Waacstats (talk) 13:48, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cassidinae stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another new one heading for the oversized category (773). Looking at the category the following is viable but as no permcats exist I can't give a realible petscan search:

Waacstats (talk) 13:48, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Galerucinae stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
New one in the oversized category (1015 articles). It looks like following would bring it down to the 700 region:

Waacstats (talk) 13:48, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Northern Ontario geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 600 articles and deserving of a trim the following appears to be sensible

Not all of these will pass 60 so as usual templates first categories for those that make 60. Waacstats (talk) 13:48, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cologne S-Bahn stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was do not create.
Rhine-Ruhr S-Bahn stubs should be split to match the split of the parent article (Rhine-Ruhr S-Bahn) to Cologne S-Bahn.

In the alternative, station articles served by the Cologne S-Bahn and not the Rhine-Ruhr S-Bahn could be upmerged into North Rhine-Westphalia railway station stubs. Mackensen (talk) 01:39, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It doesnt look like there are enough articles for a category, I was going tosuggust we create the template and use that to upmerge to both categories, but I suppose there is no guarentee that all the articles to do with Cologne S-Bahn are stations (different lines, the trains people involved etc). Maybe for now we just put both templates on any that need them. Waacstats (talk) 17:10, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, Cologne S-Bahn stubs would only be a subset of North Rhine-Westphalia railway station stubs; I'm fairly certain it doesn't cross into another state. I'll just re-categorize as appropriate. Mackensen (talk) 20:05, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
May I suggest that, since Cologne is a location, we should capitalize the template: {{Cologne-sbahn-stub}}? Also, should "SBahn" also be capitalized in the template? Her Pegship (?) 19:54, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

20th-century painting stubs split

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
20th-century painting stubs should be split up by decade, like its predecessors.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1930s comedy film sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose making 1930s American comedy film stubs ({{1930s-US-comedy-film-stub}}), which will be a subcategory of 1930s comedy film stubs, American comedy film stubs, and 1930s comedy film stubs. 394 articles are waiting for the new template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 15:28, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals&oldid=1325371432"