User talk:Narutolovehinata5
| This is Narutolovehinata5's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
|
| 1 December 2025 |
|
Please leave a new message below this line. Remember to add a section heading. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
- Also, if you are asking why I tagged your page for deletion, just leave a new message below the "Talk Page" thing. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 07:40, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Please add new sections below this line. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:46, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia Asian Month 2021 Postcard
[edit]Dear Participants,
Congratulations!
It's Wikipedia Asian Month's honor to have you all participated in Wikipedia Asian Month 2021, the seventh Wikipedia Asian Month. Your achievements were fabulous, and all the articles you created make the world can know more about Asia in different languages! Here we, the Wikipedia Asian Month International team, would like to say thank you for your contribution also cheer for you that you are eligible for the postcard of Wikipedia Asian Month 2021. Please kindly fill the form, let the postcard can send to you asap!
- This form will be closed at March 15.
Cheers!
Thank you and best regards,
New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022
[edit]Hello Narutolovehinata5,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.
Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.
Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

Suggestions:
- There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
- Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
- Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
- This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.
Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!
- Reminders
- Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
- If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023
[edit]Hello Narutolovehinata5,

- Backlog
The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.
- 2022 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!
Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)
New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js
Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.
Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.
- Reminders
- Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
- There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
The Wikipedia Asian Month 2022 Barnstar
[edit]
Dear Narutolovehinata5 :
- Thanks for participating Wikipedia Asian Month 2022. We are grateful of your dedication to Wikimedia movement and hope you join us next year!
- Wish you all the best!
New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023
[edit]Hello Narutolovehinata5,

Backlog
Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.
Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.
Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.
You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.
Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).
Reminders
- Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
- There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord and #wikimedia-npp connect on IRC.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Invite to Join Wikipedia Asian Month 2023
[edit]You are receiving this message because you participated in the Wikipedia Asian Month 2022 as an organizer or editor.

Dear all,
The Wikipedia Asian Month 2023[1] is coming ! The campaign start within a flexible 30 days from November to December. Following with the changes of the rules made by last year, the wish to have more people get to know Asia and Asian related topic is the same! Click "Here" to Organize/Join a WAM Event.
1. Propose "Focus Theme" related to Asia !
If you are based somewhere in Asia, or have specific passion on an Asian topic, please propose your "Focus Theme" by October 25th. The WAM international team will select 5 themes. Please propose your focus theme through this link[2].
2. Enhancing existing articles can also count as part of campaign contribution.
Any edits, including creating new articles or adding new content to existing articles, over 3000 bytes in total would be able to get a reward. Last year, due to this change of rules, the Programs & Events Dashboard was suggested. However, according to community survey of 2022, Fountain Tool is still the best platform for tracking edit and points. You don’t need to create any Dashboard. For the tracking of editing existing article, the international team is currently designing a form. Will soon publish to the main page of WAM 2023.
3. More flexible campaign time
The contribution duration would remain 30days, but we extended the overall campaign timeline to 2 months. All organizers can decide when to start their WAM as long as the whole duration is within November 1st to December 31th. It means that you can participate in WAM based on the needs of your local community.
Timetable
- October 1st, 2023 : Publish International Campaign Page of the Year
- October 5th to 25th, 2023 : Call for focus themes of WAM 2023.
- Before 29 October, 2023: Complete Registration [3] of Each language Wikipedia.
- November 1st, UTC 00:00 to December 31th, UTC 00:00, 2023: Running the Campaign. (Find your local campaign for the actual event date.)
- January 1st to March 15th, 2024: Auditing of each language Wikipedia.
- March 30th, 2024: Deadline of reporting statistics and eligible editors to the International Team
- April 1st to May 15th, 2024: The international team distributes Barnstars and Certificates to eligible editors of each event.
For your information, the main page of Wikipedia Asian Month is currently undertaking a reconstruction for archiving purpose. For the 2023 event please bookmarked this page. We hope you will enjoy Wikipedia Asian Month! If you have any inquiry, feel free to contact us by info@asianmonth.wiki [4]. We look forward to your participation.
Cheers!!!
WAM 2023 International Team
[1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Asian_Month_2023
[3] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Asian_Month_2023/Join_an_Event
[4] info@asianmonth.wiki
2023 WAM Message to Organizers
[edit]
The 2023 Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) Campaign has ended. On behalf of the WAM International Team, we express our gratitude for your effort and participation.
We are writing to remind you to begin the jury process. Some WAM Campaigns ended earlier, and have already finished auditing and reviewing contributions.
Please suggest all campaigns to complete the following before January 31th, 2024:
1. Finalize their list
2. Report the username of your Wikipedia Asian Ambassador, the participant who has the most edit in your campaign
3. Update a list of all eligible editors on the 2023 WAM Ambassadors page, list of eligible editors column
We look forward to your updates.
Thanks so much!
WAM International Team
Inappropriate dyk rejection
[edit]Hi
I have no idea why https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Did_you_know_nominations/The_World_After_Gaza this was rejected despite the article and 2 hooks being approved by the reviewer. I do not see how a response to the last comment would be helpful or necessary since the additional hooks proposed were inferior to the original approved ones. It doesn't seem right that a third editor can derail a nomination just by inappropriately slapping a needs additional review tag when they never suggested any problem with the article or hooks. (t · c) buidhe 18:32, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- I was looking at the nomination and I saw that it had been stuck for over a month and thought there had been no progress. I thought that the hooks had been rejected. I'm sorry about the miscommunication. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:12, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
DYK for Kyōka Moriya
[edit]On 6 November 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kyōka Moriya, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Kyōka Moriya cosplayed for her driver's license photo? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kyōka Moriya. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Kyōka Moriya), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.
Launchballer 00:02, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
| Hook update | ||
| Your hook reached 15,415 views (642.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of November 2025 – nice work! |
GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Discussions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga § Merging defunct WikiProjects and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga § Need some help on the Biography task force's anime credits
[edit]
You are invited to join the discussions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga § Merging defunct WikiProjects and at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga § Need some help on the Biography task force's anime credits. sjones23 (talk - contributions) 12:42, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
DYK for Tetsudō Musume
[edit]On 15 November 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tetsudō Musume, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that some Japanese railway companies have their own character mascots? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tetsudō Musume. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tetsudō Musume), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.
—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:03, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Ryan Chen
[edit]Could you check this article out now to see whether it qualifies for Asian History Month? Thanks Shelter3 (talk) 16:09, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
- As long as the "encyclopedic tone" tag is still there, the answer is no. I just took a look at the article again and it does not seem like the issue has been addressed. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 11:22, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
Please take a look again now.--Shelter3 (talk) 12:51, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
- Regrettably, the issues remain. If you are having trouble with the wording, I would suggest asking you for help from a copyeditor, or perhaps at WT:WAM. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:05, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
- I've worked so much on this already and have copyedited in the past. Could you give some examples? You seem really stringent, and I'd like to spend my time on other articles.--Shelter3 (talk) 14:01, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
- There are parts in the article that sound more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. For example, sentences such as
He was pleased, however, with the traffic he was getting to do impressions
andHe is also struggling to make money off his talent: He has done a deal with Chongqing Beer but social media platforms, though rigorously censored in China, have been inundated with unfettered ridicule of Trump, including A.I.-generated videos.
Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 14:06, 21 November 2025 (UTC)- I didn't know people wanted to sleep when they read but okay, where are the other sections? Shelter3 (talk) 22:43, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
- The article looks better now, although now thinking about it, I'm not sure what the relevance of "but social media platforms, though rigorously censored in China, have been inundated with unfettered ridicule of Trump, including A.I.-generated videos." is to the article. It might be safer to just reword or even delete that part. I'm willing to accept it now in its current state, although you may need to remove the tag from the article.--Shelter3 (talk) 16:27, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, I agree it does undercut the article.--Shelter3 (talk) 16:27, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
- As an aside, I would advise you to be careful with your language. The above comment could be seen as rude, and taking a look at your talk page, it appears that you have had a history of using abrasive language. Please be sure to assume good faith in the future and to avoid such tone to avoid getting into trouble. Thank you and happy editing. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 08:34, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry about that. It's just frustrating to be told something twice when a critiquing (or any other) editor can just go in and change it themselves. I really do appreciate what you do!--Shelter3 (talk) 16:27, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
- As an aside, I have temporarily rejected Tsubasa Makoto as much of the article is lacking footnotes or referencing. I will accept the article once that is resolved. Also, Kaori Yoshida was added to Fountain with the wrong title. I have added the correct title to Fountain. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 11:33, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
- I appreciate that. Could you take a look at Tsubasa Makoto again now? thanks! Shelter3 (talk) 14:00, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Shelter3: The "Education" section is still lacking references. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 22:28, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5 Hi, I was wondering whether articles that receive a score of 0 due to issues are eligible for re-evaluation. For University of Nepal, the feedback I got was: "not accepted - Article is written like an advertisement and would need to be rewritten". I have addressed the issue and reduced the promotional-like tone but I am not sure if it still sounds promotional so I was wondering if you could kindly take another look at it and have it re-evaluated and provide me with further feedback to improve the article. Thanks. Quackyisland (talk) 03:46, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Quackyisland: It's improved, but it still has some promotional elements here and there. In addition, the "Governance Structure" section would probably be better written as a prose section instead of the weird list it is at the moment. Given time is running out, I suggest you reach out to a copyeditor. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:53, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
- I have located and vigorously addressed the promotional elements in University of Nepal and I am positive that my article is more neutral than pH 7. I have also wrote the "Governance Structure" section in a prose form. Would you kindly take another look at it? Thank you so much. Quackyisland (talk) 21:33, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5 P.S.
- I have reached a point where any remaining "promotional tone" is mild residue from quoting the university's own documents and I have made attributions. Quackyisland (talk) 21:39, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Quackyisland: My suggestion remains to seek a copyeditor. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:11, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Quackyisland: It's improved, but it still has some promotional elements here and there. In addition, the "Governance Structure" section would probably be better written as a prose section instead of the weird list it is at the moment. Given time is running out, I suggest you reach out to a copyeditor. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:53, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5 Hi, I was wondering whether articles that receive a score of 0 due to issues are eligible for re-evaluation. For University of Nepal, the feedback I got was: "not accepted - Article is written like an advertisement and would need to be rewritten". I have addressed the issue and reduced the promotional-like tone but I am not sure if it still sounds promotional so I was wondering if you could kindly take another look at it and have it re-evaluated and provide me with further feedback to improve the article. Thanks. Quackyisland (talk) 03:46, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Shelter3: The "Education" section is still lacking references. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 22:28, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
- I appreciate that. Could you take a look at Tsubasa Makoto again now? thanks! Shelter3 (talk) 14:00, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
- As an aside, I have temporarily rejected Tsubasa Makoto as much of the article is lacking footnotes or referencing. I will accept the article once that is resolved. Also, Kaori Yoshida was added to Fountain with the wrong title. I have added the correct title to Fountain. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 11:33, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
- I didn't know people wanted to sleep when they read but okay, where are the other sections? Shelter3 (talk) 22:43, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
- There are parts in the article that sound more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. For example, sentences such as
- I've worked so much on this already and have copyedited in the past. Could you give some examples? You seem really stringent, and I'd like to spend my time on other articles.--Shelter3 (talk) 14:01, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
Tsubasa Makoto
[edit]Could you take a look now? Thank you so much! Shelter3 (talk) 14:45, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
- As the issues have been resolved, I have now accepted it. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 16:07, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
Women in Red - December 2025
[edit]Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.
Announcements:
Tip of the Month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:18, 28 November 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
