Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Krips

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 02:04, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Amanda Krips

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Basically just one of hundreds of participants in the JET Programme who has happened to have a couple of local articles written about her. No indication of why she is notable among those hundreds of participants. Fails WP:GNG. Michitaro (talk) 12:34, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Michitaro (talk) 12:36, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:00, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:00, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:01, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:01, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It's interesting to get local news coverage on two continents, but the lack of meaningful content in the article and in the sources does not meet the notability standard. Alansohn (talk) 18:30, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete SPA creation with a ref from her high school, her favorite Pokemon amine and a single mention in The Japan Times. Fails WP:GNG. Sam 🎤 08:20, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not enough significant coverage in reliable sources. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 23:46, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No claim to notability in article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:44, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.