Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Websites

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Websites. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Websites|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Websites. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Suggested inclusion guidelines for this topic area can be found at WP:WEB.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Websites/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Websites

Pinoy Auto Trader

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Shortlived company that lasted just 15 months; article supported by lots of churnalism and recycled press releases in sector media, but I don’t think this passes WP:NORG. Mccapra (talk) 13:39, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Internet, and Philippines. Mccapra (talk) 13:39, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:58, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:25, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Forsalebyowner.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems like another non-WP:NCORP, WP:CORPTRIV-sourced company article; on top of that it's written like a product summary/advertisement. The only thing I could see that possibly evidences notability here is the lawsuit, but there doesn't seem to be enough SIGCOV to create an article. A GNews search turns up a lot of predictable passing/CORPTRIV stuff, and a GScholar search turns up some passing mentions in papers about FSBO sales in general, but not any sigcov about this site itself. Maybe its content could be included into For sale by owner as an ATD if deletion isn't preferred? Athanelar (talk) 02:18, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Companies. Athanelar (talk) 02:18, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Websites and United States of America. jolielover♥talk 03:15, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Illinois, Michigan, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:06, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted garbage page no gng meeting criteria, just deletion is okay. 15:05, 6 December 2025 (UTC)Maazoz (talk)
Delete - The article doesn’t have enough independent, reliable coverage to show lasting notability. The 2003 lawsuit is the only potentially notable part, but unless there are strong sources highlighting its impact, the content (including company history) would be better merged into For sale by owner or a general FSBO websites article. If anyone can provide solid, independent coverage, the notability case could be revisited; until then, deletion with merge seems appropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SanneMonte (talk • contribs) 18:07, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Rocket Companies#Subsidiaries, where appropriate short mention of it within its current company is already blended into that section; this article looks as if it hasn't really been touched in years outside the mention of said acquisition by Rocket outside of maintenance, general 'spam everything' real estate SPAs, and reverted COI edits. Nathannah • 📮 18:26, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Soccerway

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find evidence of this website receiving any significant coverage from independent sources after searching for them, thus the topic does not pass WP:WEB. Some sources in the article discuss a recent merging of football websites that is related to this one, but they do not give significant coverage to the website itself or provide evidence of its notability. The other sources are simply a website that list domains, and a primary source. TheInevitables (talk) 22:43, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Websites. TheInevitables (talk) 22:43, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:47, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Soccerway is used as a valid source. Despite the downgrade, it would be strange to delete something so widely used in the project. Svartner (talk) 12:39, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The AfD isn't about whether Soccerway is a reliable source, it's about whether there's significant coverage that would indicate the website is notable enough to have an article. Robby.is.on (talk) 12:46, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
But that would be quite inconsistent, that's the point. Svartner (talk) 12:51, 3 December 2025 (UTC).[reply]

I don't see how. Again, reliability isn't the same as notability. Robby.is.on (talk) 12:55, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 20:29, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per previous AFD. Giant Snowman 20:33, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTDIR, which is a more apt policy for deletion to me. Govvy (talk) 10:34, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yibada

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find evidence that this meets WP:N. Boleyn (talk) 09:45, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Per nom. Svartner (talk) 11:25, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Companies, Websites, China, Hong Kong, California, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:46, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- lack of enough SIGCOV sources to suggest notability at least from english sites so far.Lorraine Crane (talk) 16:29, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Website Proposed deletions