User:Winhunter
Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.
| Languages | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Search user languages |
| Userbox | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Search user languages |
| No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful) |
Articles I...
[edit]Created
[edit]- Nationality Law of the People's Republic of China
- Higher education in Hong Kong (Translated)
- Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Translated)
- Learn from Dazhai in agriculture
- University Grants Committee
Expanded significantly
[edit]My other accounts
[edit]- WinBot (BRFA · contribs · actions log · block log · flag log · user rights)
- Winpublic (talk · contribs · count) (For use in public computers)
My bookmarks
[edit]
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- Sylvia UTAR DCCPR (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 61 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user removing references, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:44, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 113.178.144.81 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. User has vandalized from 2 temp accounts. A block on the IP is needed. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:40, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- Пүүдоржийн Буяннэмэх (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 08:00, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
This username matched "Attempting to skip filters using multiple similar characters" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 08:00, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Multiple special characters can be contained in the same phrase, this rule detects when one or more occurs. -- DQB (owner / report) 08:00, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Mojang.co (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Misleading username: Likely trying to impersonate the Mojang company – LuniZunie(talk) 21:27, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- Temporary account 2 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. Potential fake testing account. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 01:20, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Both unsourced additions and MOS:CAPS violations by TA hopper. Jalen Barks (Woof) 05:56, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Temporary Extended Confirmed Protection: Persistent in additional unsourced or poorly sourced. ~2025-39520-55 (talk) 07:15, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Many disruptive edits in past few days. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 07:30, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- I'm so sorry the [[Cyberbot I]] remove it by archiving so I fixed it. ~2025-39520-55 (talk) 07:33, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. BOVINEBOY2008 08:36, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Not done for now, as it seems to have died down (nothing in 36 hours). Sdrqaz (talk) 07:28, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting short-term PCPP until 21 Dec (when the final episode airs) due to ongoing vandalism from temporary accounts. 11WB (talk) 09:37, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Make extended-confirmed indefinitely. That page are WP:RUSUKR topic area. However, due of ongoing issues of the current conflict, possibly in the future. like the currently extended-confirmed protected page such as Toretsk. TentingZones1 (talk) 10:58, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – reversion edit war by unregistered user to initially and now essentially version created by two sock puppets. This has been reported as possible further sock puppetry. Whatever some article protection after reversion seems appropriate until sock puppet investigation done. ChaseKiwi (talk) 11:37, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. TheWikiholic (talk) 13:11, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Asking for temporary page protection due to disruptive edits by IP user(s). The page had already been protected, but the issue remains. Sricsi (talk) 13:34, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Please discuss with them on the talk page instead of edit-warring. Sdrqaz (talk) 07:53, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – This is kind of complicated. A non extended-confirmed editor performed an undiscussed split of Malayalam, which resulted in this article. since Malayalam is indefinitely EC-protected, I think this should be, too. Or, should this split be reverted because it was undiscussed and the editor who did it isn't EC? Chess enjoyer (talk) 14:07, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Codename AD talk 15:08, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:22, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unreliable sources from temp accounts. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 15:16, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of temporary account vandalism MossOnALogTalk 16:58, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 17:57, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I've done so. Sdrqaz (talk) 07:53, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Covered by WP:CT/IMH. Recent IP vandalisms stem from the release of a related film but the article is also generally the target of them. Gotitbro (talk) 18:06, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Anonymous account(s) repeatedly vandalizing the article with small, subtle, annoying vandalism. User warned several times. CoryGlee 18:19, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: ~2025-34273-07 (talk · contribs) blocked by Izno. Sdrqaz (talk) 07:53, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:11, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 07:53, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:CT/IMH article repeatedly subject to drive by disruptive edits by either IPs or new accounts as has recently been the case. Asking for a perma ECP per IMH guidelines. Gotitbro (talk) 19:30, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – The Houthis are involved in the Civil War. They use the Civil War as a front to attack Israel. Thus they are in a proxy conflict as Iran funds them not only to attack Saudi Arabia, but also Israel. Felicia (talk) 19:33, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Not strictly within the topic area; very few mentions of Israel in the article and little disruption in the article history. Sdrqaz (talk) 07:28, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Once again I am asking for protection as now there are other IP and non-confirmed users adding Nasry as the president-elect without any official projection from reliable sources. The 2025 Honduran general election article is already protected too. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 19:45, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:54, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent edit warring by temporary account and unwilling to engage discussion on talk page. (diff, diff, diff, and diff). Ckfasdf (talk) 19:49, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. GPL93 (talk) 19:58, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection (move only): Page-move vandalism. Page move vandalism by an autoconfirmed user against consensus. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 20:08, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
It isn't vandalism, but it is being moved without consensus. I still think there needs to be a move protection. I am not an administrator, but I wanted to say this. Felicia (talk) 20:21, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- Move protected. Set to allow extended confirmed users to move the page in case consensus changes. Also opened an SPI as I have a tingling feeling it's duck season. - The Bushranger One ping only 05:50, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Not a single constructive edit since previous protection expired. Sugar Tax (talk) 20:10, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 07:53, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Edits by temporary accounts against consensus. See also Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Legal Threat. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:24, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – PC isn't working since the source of the disruption is using vandalbots/scripts. Please semi-protect. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 23:04, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent slow-mo warring since last prot, need indef prot. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 00:27, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last such activity was over three weeks ago. Sdrqaz (talk) 07:28, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
full-protection: Highly sensitive topic which could be a Victim of negative historical revisionism: denialism [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azoresgeo (talk • contribs) 01:26, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- I may not be an admin, but I don't see any disruption on this redirect nor on its target. Pages are not protected pre-emptively, and I don't see a reason for full protection unless it's by Arbitration or for a more serious reason. Jalen Barks (Woof) 04:26, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- Indeed; Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. The Bushranger One ping only 05:36, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- Indeed;
Indefinite semi-protection: Personal table to organise things. Just don't want anyone to edit it. r f q i i talk! 03:27, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. No demonstrated need for protection. Sdrqaz (talk) 07:28, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several vandals within 24 hours. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 04:03, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 07:28, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Perennial sock and LTA target, continuing after expiry of semi-protection a few days ago. - Umby 🌕🐶 (talk) 04:19, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock returned as soon as protection expired. Mellk (talk) 05:54, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recommend also blocking the base ip address as will likely continue. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:29, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – User talk pages are not protected except in response to severe or continued vandalism. There's been a single unblock request, so protection would be an overreaction. Please see Wikipedia:Protection policy § Blocked users. Sdrqaz (talk) 07:28, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Ban evasion by User:BlueDIAMOND20s. Binksternet (talk) 06:47, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.Mfield (Oi!) 06:50, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:01, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism on adding WP:SOAPBOX and improper WP:SYNTH edits of characterizing the subject's religion as a cult and making toilet humor wordplay on his name (Marcobeta) - kubeta or toilet in Tagalog. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 07:27, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Create protection: Offensive name – Attack page against Donald Trump that was deleted twice. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:46, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly recreated A7 deletion, user should go to draftspace. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:48, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: Fssuzon (talk · contribs) blocked by Jimfbleak. Protections are not for single-user issues. Sdrqaz (talk) 07:53, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting a request for unprotection, please discuss it with the protecting administrator first. You can create a request below only if you receive no response from them.
To find out which administrator protected the page, go to the page's edit history and click on the "View logs for this page" link (located underneath the page's title). The protecting administrator is listed in the protection log entry, next to the words "protected", "changed protection level", or "configured pending changes". If there are a large number of log entries on the page, use the drop-down menu near the top of the page and select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" to filter the logs accordingly.
DO NOT request a reduction in protection if...
- ...you are being prevented from editing the page. A desire to change content is not a valid reason for unprotection. Instead:
- If you can edit the article's talk page, use the WP:Edit Request Wizard to propose a change on the article's talk page. Include an explanation of the exact content that you want to change, and what the content will be afterward.
- If the article's talk page is protected, you may propose a change at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Edit.
- ...your reasoning for reducing protection is that the article has not been vandalized. That simply means the protection is working as intended.
- ...your reasoning for reducing protection is basically "a long time has passed" without supporting details.
- ...you haven't contacted the protecting administrator.
You may request a protection reduction below if...
- ...you want to change the protection level of a template or module from full protection to template protection. You may add the request to this page without having to discuss it with the protecting administrator first.
- ...you need to remove creation protection from a location where no page exists (redlinked pages) after a draft version of the intended article is prepared beforehand and ready to be published.
- ...you are proposing a trial reduction in protection for a page that has been protected for several years, provided the proposal is supported by evidence such as talk page activity, page views, page traffic, number of watchers, frequency of edit requests, and prior history of vandalism.
- ...the protecting administrator is inactive or has not responded to you in several days.
If you cannot locate your request, make sure to check the request archives to see if it's been moved there. Only requests that have been recently answered will still be listed here.
Reason: Template should only be semi-protected, per WP:HIGHRISK: 672 transclusions. — hike395 (talk) 12:25, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please add an edit request to the talk page of the protected page before adding an edit request here
Requests for specific edits should be made on the talk page of the protected article. You can create an edit request below only if the talk page is also protected, preventing you from adding a request there.
- You may add the appropriate template (
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}) to the article's talk page if you would like to request an edit be made. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - For edit requests being made due to the editor having a conflict of interest with the article subject (see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used instead of the others listed above. - Requests to move pages that are currently move-protected should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not on this page.
- This page is not for holding discussions regarding content. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit that you wish to be performed.
Otherwise, this is the correct place to use in order to add an edit request if you are unable to add one to the article's talk page. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to properly add a request.
Pls add reference to WSJ article on vast scale of Gaza Destruction, WSJ is traditionally pro war (editor was Max Boot), and it's significant that even they are admitting it https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/gaza-rubble-reconstruction-israel-war-85f12cfa Progress and Poverty (talk) 13:58, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- The WSJ article doesn't use the genocide label. It reports the facts on the ground. So, it is probably better suited for Gaza war#Scale of destruction and/or the main article Israeli bombing of the Gaza Strip. You are welcome to post an edit request on the talk page of either article asking for one or more specific pieces of information from the source to be incorporated. If you do so, you should follow the WP:EDITXY guideline, and avoid personal opinion/analysis. I don't think it has been used so far according to this and this anyway, but there may already be discussions somewhere... Sean.hoyland (talk) 14:47, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 1 protected edit request | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 00:27, 11 December 2025 (UTC) |
| 19 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 04:20, 11 December 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
Hello, I'd like to request autopatrolled rights, seeing as I've made 32 mainspace articles, none of which are stubs (I do not rate my own created pages). Thus far, I've focused on creating pages related to music, most of which pertain to WP:Albums. Thanks, Fundgy (talk) 06:10, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Track record of creating acceptable articles. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 20:38, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Hello! I was recently recommended by Aszx5000 on my talk page to apply for Autopatrolled permission. I have made about 6,700 edits and authored 88 articles and counting, which I always aim to publish at C or B class quality. I believe I have a strong understanding of relevant policy which I'm always striving to improve, and am always open to feedback and correction. Cheers! Johnson524 07:19, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
I've noticed B33tle's profilic creation of species-related pages (over 500 in the past 2 weeks), particularly beetle related pages. All of these seem excellent, and I have no doubts B33tle will do well with this permission (while also reducing the load on new page reviewers). All their contributions have been in line with the recent village pump discussion regarding their mass edits (3+ reliable sources, limiting to ~100 per day, following up with discussions on talk page), further bolstering my confidence in them. I'd also encourage them to consider Auto Wiki Browser permissions, if it would benefit them. Signed, Guessitsavis (she/they) Talk 13:24, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
Looking in the future, I see myself working in WP Taylor Swift (or generally WP pop music). A fair recent example was when I mass created drafts of songs in Taylor Swift's new album, in which they all followed the same structure and had similar categories. It was very annoying to have to work on all of them one-by-one, and I feel like AWB will help if I meet such an example again. HwyNerd Mike (t | c) 23:05, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
I'd like to use the tool to update South Australia place articles to use new pushpin location maps specific to regions of that vast state. I have used AWB heavily on English Wiktionary, so I'm already familiar with the tool. This, that and the other (talk) 05:46, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
I am admin/sysop for Balinese wikipedia. Need to maintain it regularly with bots. Thanks. Angayubagia (talk) 07:13, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed[edit]
Becoming a manually "confirmed" user on Wikipedia earlier than the standard, automated route offers immediate access to critical editing tools, providing a substantial advantage for dedicated contributors and those involved in structured editing projects. The standard autoconfirmed status requires an editor to wait four days and make ten edits naturally over time. Requesting manual confirmation bypasses this waiting period entirely, accelerating an editor's ability to fully participate in the encyclopedia's collaborative environment. The primary motivation for seeking this status earlier is to immediately gain the trust and functionality necessary to circumvent anti-vandalism measures designed for brand-new accounts. Confirmed editors can instantly begin editing semi-protected pages, which are often high-traffic or controversial articles that administrators lock down to prevent disruption. Furthermore, they are immediately empowered to create new articles directly in the main encyclopedia space without the bottleneck of submitting drafts through the Articles for Creation process. Early confirmation also unlocks essential account maintenance tasks, such as moving or renaming pages to correct titles and uploading files (images, multimedia) to support articles. For those participating in group editing events like edit-a-thons, obtaining this status immediately is crucial, as it allows participants to focus purely on content creation rather than administrative hurdles. In essence, seeking early confirmation is a practical step for serious editors to immediately remove the software limitations imposed on new users, allowing them to contribute efficiently and without artificial delay. The Force Awakens The Last Jedi Who Became A Rouge One (talk) 06:06, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
I am a 65 year old student at the University of Kentucky. I unfortunately am also a procrastinator of epic proportions. For my ICT201 class I am supposed to make changes to and add 4 references to any article of my choice. I have researched the topic that I want to add to and have waited until the last minute to do the changes (it is due at midnight tonight). I have read that I can make 10 edits and be moved up to the level to make changes to the semi-protected page but I have not researched, nor prepared edits to any other pages. Please move my account to the next level so that I can edit the article and maintain my A in my class. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter Tiredofurwhining (talk) 22:31, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
Want to translate more English article into Chinese, enhance wikipedia's language diversity. Xingzhi Zhou (talk) 10:51, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Requesting extentend-confirmed for my alt account User:Theknoledgeableperson-ALT Theknoledgeableperson (|have a chat) 20:08, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
I have noticed that there is a massive backlog, and I assume you could use some help. I’d love to provide that help. Cooldood5555 (let's talk) 22:40, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Hello! I have noticed that the backlog is pretty big and would love to help out with it. I have over 500 edits, and I have written 21 articles. I have also participated in an Afd discussion on Ermold v. Davis. Thank you! Thefinals626472 (talk) 15:11, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover[edit]
Hi, I'm a trial NPP and AFC reviewer and doing new page patrol requires moving some articles to draft for better improvements as they're not suitable in the main space, it will be more better if I can move articles without leaving redirects. This right would also be helpful for when I close RMs so that I don't need to request the move be performed at WP:RM/TR afterwards, as well as potentially helping out with moves there myself. Destinyokhiria 💬 21:59, 9 December 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
I am requesting to be a requested changes reviewer as I got understanding of Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Vandalism, Wikipedia:Verifiability. While I may of had multiple articles made by me rejected, this was from a while ago that I don't bother working on when I was absolutely terrible of editing around like 3 months ago. Additionally, I would be happy to work doing reviewing changes and checking it at least every day. Additionally, I got 900+ edits, and joined around 6 months ago with loads of huge editing, notably my 61016 article I have made.
My request was declined, so I am requesting Pending changes reviewer again, with 600 total edits. Aikee Moral (talk) 05:00, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
I have a substantial track record in counter-vandalism work and believe this would help me in that mission. (I also have AfC, rollback, and temp user IP viewing rights, if that helps.) I am an active participant in the Guild of Copy Editors, Unsourced Articles, and other, area specific projects. I agree to use this right according to policy and as an active participant in a particularly contentious CTOP, I will also leave relevant changes within that CTOP to uninvolved editors unless it's particularly egregious vandalism. Thank you in advance! Smallangryplanet (talk) 18:19, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
I would like to request rollback to remove vandalism more efficiently. I have over 900 edits most of which are from RC patrol. I have no history of edit warring, and always warn users if they vandalise pages. I would like rollback rights to use AntiVandal. Thanks. SuperCode111 (talk) 00:46, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
|---|
Template editor[edit] |
| Requests for temporary account IP viewer |
|---|
Temporary account IP viewer[edit]
going through page histories, i often have to revert all the edits of a user. taiv would help to find the problematic edits of temporary accounts. ltbdl (activate) 05:33, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
|
Immediate requests
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Wikipedians looking for help | 1 |
| Requests for unblock | 93 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages | 0 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations | 2 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion | 41 |
| Wikipedia fully protected edit requests | 1 |
Deletion
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Articles for deletion | 657 |
| Templates for deletion | 147 |
| Categories for deletion | 623 |
| Wikipedia files for discussion | 58 |
| All redirects for discussion | 428 |
| Miscellaneous pages for deletion | 35 |
| Possible copyright violations | 11 |
| All articles proposed for deletion | 178 |
| All files proposed for deletion | 11 |
| Unsorted AfD debates | 3 |
| All files with the same name on Commons | 12 |
Image copyright problems
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Orphaned non-free use | 357 |
| Unknown copyright status | 19 |
| Unknown source | 11 |
| No non-free use rationale | 1 |
| Replaceable non-free use images | 11 |
| Disputed non-free use images | 22 |
Page protection
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Protected | 10 |
| Semi-protected user and user talk pages | 1,275 |
| Fully protected user and user talk pages | 460 |
| Protected against vandalism | 4 |
| Protected talk pages of blocked users | 34 |
| Semi-protected | 2,224 |
| Arbitration 500/30 restricted | 0 |
Cleanup
[edit]|
General cleanup | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| All pages needing cleanup | 34,132 | 0.48 |
| All articles needing rewrite | 6,388 | 0.09 |
| All articles needing expert attention | 1,322 | 0.02 |
| All Wikipedia articles in need of updating | 43,277 | 0.61 |
|
Reference problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| All pages needing factual verification | 11,964 | 0.17 |
| All articles with unsourced statements | 565,248 | 7.96 |
| All articles lacking sources | 40,237 | 0.57 |
| All unreferenced BLPs | 20 | 0 |
| All articles needing additional references | 514,694 | 7.25 |
| All articles needing references cleanup | 4,938 | 0.07 |
| All articles lacking in-text citations | 108,281 | 1.52 |
| All articles with dead external links | 337,762 | 4.75 |
|
Image cleanup problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| Image files for cleanup | 17 | - |
| Wikipedia files lacking a description | 138 | - |
| Wikipedia files with unknown source | 12 | - |
|
Other problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| All articles proposed for merging | 734 | 0.01 |
| All articles proposed for splitting | 849 | 0.01 |
| Unsorted Stubs | 3 | - |
| Stub categories | 21,143 | - |
| All uncategorized pages | 161 | 0 |
| All orphaned articles | 54,878 | 0.77 |
| All articles needing copy edit | 1,717 | 0.02 |
| All articles with style issues | 19,826 | 0.28 |
| All Wikipedia articles needing context | 2,632 | 0.04 |
| All articles that may contain original research | 16,887 | 0.24 |
Miscellaneous
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Requested moves | 349 |
| All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes | 3,515 |
| All accuracy disputes | 15,661 |
| Articles with invalid ISBNs | 0 |
| Articles with invalid ISSNs | 17 |
| All articles to be expanded | 56,222 |
Special pages
[edit]| Maintenance reports | Information |
|---|---|
| Broken redirects | |
| Dead-end pages | Dead-end pages |
| Dormant pages | Dusty articles |
| DoubleRedirects | Double redirects |
| Lonely pages | Orphaned articles |
| Long pages | |
| New pages | New page patrol |
| New pages feed | Page curation |
| Protected pages | Protection policy |
| Short pages | |
| Uncategorized | Categorization |
| Uncategorized cats | |
| Uncategorized templates | |
| Unused categories | |
| Unused files (images) | |
| Unused templates | |
| Without interwiki links | |
| Most interwiki links |
Sub-page listing
[edit]Hong Kong
[edit]
Misc
[edit] Delete
|
 Keep
|
 Neutral
|
 Oppose
|
 Support
|
 Note
|
 Template
|
| This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Winhunter. |
| Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0 | ||
| I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides. | ||